And then there also is a hardware solutions. A very generic one,
available in
any half-decent hardware store. I think they call 'm cutting
pliers and
will make sure those leds will never be turned on again...
I've got DuctTape 1.0 running on mine, it fixes the LED issues.
;
--
Jay
I was being sarcastic. The $399 moko will somehow end up nearer 399
euro for those over the pond. its the same with all electronic
goods over here.
Jon Spooner
Michele Renda wrote:
1 $ = 0.70 euro + tva = 0.84 euro != 4 euro
Jonathan Spooner wrote:
Oh great so in Europe that will
God evening to you a/All. I'd agree that some types of tip a
programmer has some problems. It's been tried before and i think it
failed miserably.(At least languishes in obscurity).
But on the other hand, there might be a hidden gem inside the proposal.
Google's Summer of Code has proven to work,
2008/4/21 Brandon Kruger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This tip a programmer idea is very interesting. What does the community
think about setting up a site where people can say We'll each donate x
amount once y feature is integrated or something of the sort. This way,
Openmoko can see what
the problem with paying a bounty for these sort of things, is that
progammers then end up competing against each other, so are less
inclined to share their part-way results, thus potentially slowing
down a solution to the problem
this was shown quite clearly a couple of years back, with the
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:05:20 +0200, Ron K. Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's wonderful the focus of the community is now
all about $399 vs $400 rather than availability
of Freerunner in certain colors.
That's the marvel of communities. All it takes is a good topic-starter. :-)
and
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
and YES I agree, the remaining V5 vs V6 issues seem small
(but we did get extra info and clarification, thanks Tony).
BTW, there is a way to work around the v5 issue in software. Because the
LED in an unmodified v5 shines 6 or so times as bright as it should (and
On Monday 21 April 2008 10:04, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:05:20 +0200, Ron K. Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
BTW, there is a way to work around the v5 issue in software. Because the
LED in an unmodified v5 shines 6 or so times as bright as it should (and
eats 6
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:35:44 +0200, Andy Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BTW, there is a way to work around the v5 issue in software. Because the
LED in an unmodified v5 shines 6 or so times as bright as it should (and
eats 6 times more power), the solution is to correct the brightness with
On 4/21/08, Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:35:44 +0200, Andy Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BTW, there is a way to work around the v5 issue in software. Because the
LED in an unmodified v5 shines 6 or so times as bright as it should (and
eats 6
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:43:18 +0200, Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, there is a way to work around the v5 issue in software. Because
the LED in an unmodified v5 shines 6 or so times as bright as it should
(and eats 6 times more power), the solution is to correct the
On Monday 21 April 2008 02:39:38 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
steve ha scritto:
I'll gladly put the price back to $650 which was the first price we
released.
LOL... BTW for me you can also put the price at 398 for staying a little
more far from 399... :P
I vote for 398 too, but I'll
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:51:52 +0200, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or just have it on for 1/6 the time or, if flashing, multiply the gap
(off state) by 6. 1 second for v6 == 6 for v5
It's exactly what PWM is about.
No. I do not think he was meaning PWM. I think I
On Sun April 20 2008 8:29:01 pm Nick Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Brandon Kruger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun April 20 2008 7:27:06 pm Kevin Dean wrote:
I'm happy paying $399 for all ye who feel the need to pay $400 to make
it even. :P Though, I'll hop on the even
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Brandon Kruger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun April 20 2008 8:29:01 pm Nick Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Brandon Kruger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun April 20 2008 7:27:06 pm Kevin Dean wrote:
I'm happy paying $399 for all ye
Subject: Re: 99 vs RED (or was it PINK) Phone cases
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:05:20 +0200, Ron K. Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's wonderful the focus of the community is now
all about $399 vs $400 rather than availability
of Freerunner in certain colors.
That's the marvel of communities
On Monday 21 April 2008 17:45:06 steve wrote:
I want a software switch that says unLEDed so I can turn blinking lights
off on any app if I so choose.
Agreed.
:M:
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
For the record, my tip a programmer thing was almost pure sarcasm. I
find this discussion to be amusing by the level of absurdity in it.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:57 AM, ramsesoriginal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so first, i also would like to see 400$ instead of 399$, because
it's simply a
On Monday 21 April 2008 17:45, steve wrote:
I want a software switch that says unLEDed so I can turn blinking lights
off on any app if I so choose.
And then there also is a hardware solutions. A very generic one, available in
any half-decent hardware store. I think they call 'm cutting pliers
Oh great so in Europe that will equate to another 4 euros.. were you
dropped on your head as a child?
Jon
Michele Renda wrote:
I agree, I'd like to pay for Freerunner 400$ in place of 399$
I alway liked 0 finishing number more than 9 finishing number.
I vote for 400$! It is a very
genius
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Powell
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 3:36 AM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: 99 vs RED (or was it PINK) Phone cases
On Monday 21 April 2008 10:04, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Mon
community discussion
Subject: Re: 99 vs RED (or was it PINK) Phone cases
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:05:20 +0200, Ron K. Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's wonderful the focus of the community is now
all about $399 vs $400 rather than availability
of Freerunner in certain colors.
That's the marvel
1 $ = 0.70 euro + tva = 0.84 euro != 4 euro
Jonathan Spooner wrote:
Oh great so in Europe that will equate to another 4 euros.. were
you dropped on your head as a child?
Jon
Michele Renda wrote:
I agree, I'd like to pay for Freerunner 400$ in place of 399$
I alway liked 0 finishing
I see those 2€ as some kind of twisted way of openmoko giving me a free
beer ;)
Alexey Feldgendler pravi:
The prices for GTA02 and the debug board are $399 and $99,
respectively. While there's nothing wrong with charging exactly 99
dollars for something, the practice of reducing a round
Yeah, I think that would be an excellent idea! Stop with the -1 or -5
prices! Free your mind :) . And as an added bonus we pay you a little more.
Ivo
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The prices for GTA02 and the debug board are $399 and $99,
So with every n Neos you get a free beer? A weird frequent buyer program?
Peter Kraker wrote:
I see those 2€ as some kind of twisted way of openmoko giving me a free
beer ;)
Alexey Feldgendler pravi:
The prices for GTA02 and the debug board are $399 and $99,
respectively. While there's
I agree, I'd like to pay for Freerunner 400$ in place of 399$
I alway liked 0 finishing number more than 9 finishing number.
I vote for 400$! It is a very strange request, I admit :)
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
The prices for GTA02 and the debug board are $399 and $99,
respectively. While
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:11:59 +0200
Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The prices for GTA02 and the debug board are $399 and $99,
respectively. While there's nothing wrong with charging exactly 99
dollars for something, the practice of reducing a round price by one
dollar, AKA
I'm happy paying $399 for all ye who feel the need to pay $400 to make
it even. :P Though, I'll hop on the even bandwagon if it's dropped as
long as Openmoko makes profit. :)
If you really want to pay more, you could set up a Tip a Developer program...
-Kevin
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:13 PM,
It's not about paying more, it's about transparency and setting a
standard for others to follow.
I vote for 400$ also.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Kevin Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy paying $399 for all ye who feel the need to pay $400 to make
it even. :P Though, I'll hop on the
no free hops, barley, and yeast. make your own beer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shiloh
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 3:02 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: 99
So with every n Neos you get a free beer
On Sun April 20 2008 7:27:06 pm Kevin Dean wrote:
I'm happy paying $399 for all ye who feel the need to pay $400 to make
it even. :P Though, I'll hop on the even bandwagon if it's dropped as
long as Openmoko makes profit. :)
If you really want to pay more, you could set up a Tip a Developer
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Brandon Kruger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun April 20 2008 7:27:06 pm Kevin Dean wrote:
I'm happy paying $399 for all ye who feel the need to pay $400 to make
it even. :P Though, I'll hop on the even bandwagon if it's dropped as
long as Openmoko makes
steve ha scritto:
I'll gladly put the price back to $650 which was the first price we
released.
LOL... BTW for me you can also put the price at 398 for staying a little
more far from 399... :P
--
Treviño's World - Life and Linux
http://www.3v1n0.net/
Hmm, isn't the dollar price just an estimation?
Cheers,
Federico
On 4/21/08, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
steve ha scritto:
I'll gladly put the price back to $650 which was the first price we
released.
LOL... BTW for me you can also put the price at 398 for staying a
35 matches
Mail list logo
