Hi Radek and everybody,
But one day your GTA02 will stop working - it might fall on the floor or
whatever. GTA04 is only replacement - that's why it's important to support
GTA04 - either by donation or buying the device.
how it connected with the subject?
This is not a reason to move the
I wrote to admin (on the address mentioned here
http://admin-trac.openmoko.org/trac), will see for feedback.
Current admin actually shouldn't do anything. Just delegate rights to
somebody else. I'm ready to participate in this process to, by the way.
On 16/03/13 15:38, Paul Wise wrote:
On
On Sunday, March 17, 2013 03:14:32 PM Dmitry Shalnoff wrote:
But one day your GTA02 will stop working - it might fall on the floor or
whatever. GTA04 is only replacement - that's why it's important to
support GTA04 - either by donation or buying the device.
how it connected with the
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:14:32 +
Dmitry Shalnoff shaln...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly I don't understand the reason to close the access for users
(who are main audience of the recourse) just to avoid the spam. It's
ridiculous.
I do see the point, but usually a wiki has an active maintainer
On Friday, March 15, 2013 03:01:37 PM Dmitry Shalnoff wrote:
And another theme I was alerted by: this is a splitting of wiki for
GTA02 and GTA04. I honestly don't really like that idea not even because
I still use GTA02 and have no plans to reject it just because more
powerful device is on
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Radek Polak wrote:
Maybe i am wrong but openmoko as company is for years dead and nobody of the
old admins is willing to spend much time on maintaining the infrastructure.
There are other folks willing to maintain the infrastructure (such as
me), but it seems
Radek Polak pson...@seznam.cz wrote:
But one day your GTA02 will stop working - it might fall on the floor or
whatever. GTA04 is only replacement -
Although it may be the only available replacement at the present
moment, it shouldn't remain that way for long. We, the FreeCalypso
community
Hi list,
I just found that I'm not able to write to wiki today. And I see that
some time ago there was discussion regarding of possibility to switch it
to read-only mode or even move somewhere else.
IMHO this is a wrong idea. Wiki is an open platform by its nature. So
the volume of spam
I fully agree.
I will eventually turn my GTA02 into a GTA04 but my wife still has here GTA02.
I think it would be good to have a GTAXX wiki with common stuff and tags for
stuff just applying to GTA02 or GTA04
robin
___
Openmoko community mailing list
it still
today.
Thanks for pointing it out.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:50:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Hi Harald, all,
To whoever is able to make the OpenMoko wiki read-only, please do
so since no-one is monitoring it for spam and removing that:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki
true, but there are a lot of GTA02 users and there is stuff on the wiki which
is important to GTA02 and GTA04. I wouldn't mind, if it was hosted at gta04.org
but if I remember correctly gta04.org was only supposed to contain information
on openphoenux
robin
Am 28.01.2013 um 16:12 schrieb robin:
true, but there are a lot of GTA02 users and there is stuff on the wiki which
is important to GTA02 and GTA04. I wouldn't mind, if it was hosted at
gta04.org
but if I remember correctly gta04.org was only supposed to contain
information
on
if the wiki can indeed be transferred, maybe you can do an official posting on
who would like to apply for write access. I would certainly like to tidy up
a couple of pages and add more recent information, but reading the gmane list
there are many others willing to do so as well.
br
robin
spam, but isn't making the (still
very important) wiki entirely read only very exccessive? I've found a
few pages with errors but I'm now unable to edit them, seemingly
forever. Please reconsider this.
The only sysadmin (Harald) doesn't yet have time to setup some anti-spam
mechanisms. I've
spam, but isn't making the (still
very important) wiki entirely read only very exccessive? I've found a
few pages with errors but I'm now unable to edit them, seemingly
forever. Please reconsider this.
The only sysadmin (Harald) doesn't yet have time to setup some anti-spam
mechanisms. I've
an editable version that I can experiment with
OpenID auth with, and possibly have an easy way to merge 'patches'
back to the read-only main site. This probably requires more patching
to the mediawiki software than I want to think about.
Timo made a dump a while ago, I guess you should use his tools
read-only, please do so
since no-one is monitoring it for spam and removing that:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges
Sorry for bringing this somewhat old topic up, but why did this have
to be done? I can understand restricting editing to registered users
only or adding CAPTCHAs
read only very exccessive? I've found a
few pages with errors but I'm now unable to edit them, seemingly
forever. Please reconsider this.
The only sysadmin (Harald) doesn't yet have time to setup some anti-spam
mechanisms. I've volunteered as a second sysadmin but Harald hasn't had
time to do some
Hi Harald, all,
To whoever is able to make the OpenMoko wiki read-only, please do so
since no-one is monitoring it for spam and removing that:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges
--
bye,
pabs
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi Paul,
I put it on my TODO list and will hopefully be able to do it still
today.
Thanks for pointing it out.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:50:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Hi Harald, all,
To whoever is able to make the OpenMoko wiki read-only, please do so
since no-one is monitoring
Yoann ARNAUD a écrit :
FAT: Filesystem panic (dev mmcblk0p1)
fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
File system has been set read-only
Solved with fsck.
--
Yoann.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Alex Fitzpatrick wrote:
Andy Green wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Andy Green wrote:
| Aah didn't I read that this new rootfs does not remount / -orw... as a
| workaround you aren't meant to use ro on the kernel
Hello there,
i don't know, what's wrong, but i had just in the beginning some
failures like
tar: cannot create directory 'device/bus': Read-only file system
this is created for every folder; input, bus etc.. so it's normal that
the system couldn't start. but why it is a read only file system? i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Hello there,
|
| i don't know, what's wrong, but i had just in the beginning some
| failures like
|
| tar: cannot create directory 'device/bus': Read-only file system
|
| this is created for every folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Green schrieb:
Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Hello there, | | i
don't know, what's wrong, but i had just in the beginning some |
failures like | | tar: cannot create directory 'device/bus':
Read-only file system
'device/bus':
| Read-only file system | | this is created for every folder; input,
| bus etc.. so it's normal that | the system couldn't start. but why
| it is a read only file system? i | maked from my other system to
| the memorycard a mkfs.ext3 . ext3 isn't | read only i think
Andy Green wrote:
Aah didn't I read that this new rootfs does not remount / -orw... as a
workaround you aren't meant to use ro on the kernel commandline...
that'll be it then.
- -Andy
I'm stuck with this also...
Has a bug been logged?
Will a new kernel be released or are we stuck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Andy Green wrote:
| Aah didn't I read that this new rootfs does not remount / -orw... as a
| workaround you aren't meant to use ro on the kernel commandline...
| that'll be it then.
|
| - -Andy
|
| I'm
Andy Green wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Andy Green wrote:
| Aah didn't I read that this new rootfs does not remount / -orw... as a
| workaround you aren't meant to use ro on the kernel commandline...
| that'll be it then.
29 matches
Mail list logo
