but still very different from the the goals of Free Software.
Are they very different?
As long as this FreeCalypso code stays very obscure and marginal, in
practice the difference might not matter that much.
I think what you're saying is that from an Open Source point of view,
his effort is
FWIW, last I checked, his work does sadly not enjoy any of those
freedoms. Yes, you *can* look at the code, change it, and redistribute
it, but you're not legally allowed to because the source code he has
is proprietary.
le sigh
Imagine you are broke and starving hungry (that's quite easy
2 matches
Mail list logo