Fernando wrote:
> Having said that, I find the physical threats out of proportion
> for the intended benefit. Not to mention counterproductive.
Please cite at least one physical threat within the last 4 y, i.e.,
later than 2013-08, after the FreeCalypso social justice
> > and thus will void your device's (FCC/CE/...)
> > approval
>
> The fact that a modem running your official firmware that falsely
> believes itself to be quadband when running on triband-calibrated hw
> VIOLATES the actual technical specs for the transmitted signals can
> only mean that the
I think it is good that you warn people about the illegality of the situation.
I don't think it is good you claim the high ground of morals. According to your
definition of right, the status of society would never change. Yes, one could
do the legal fights to change the law, I guess. Good luck
Obviously freecalypso should have a disclaimer about the legal aspects
involved, but I guess people actually interested in this would be aware (e.g.,
discussed many times) and the lack (?) of such a disclaimer is not necessarily
done in bad-faith as you claim ("lure"). But I do understand you
the moral aspects of calling somebody out for removing "no parking" signs so
people would have to pay tickets for unknowingly parking there, or not telling
people that they are in danger to even *do time in jail* when they install and
use a firmware that person provides, are not arguable in my
for the rest:
telling OM about alleged violations of rules while bluntly admitting that you
yourself don't care abouzt rules, have no clue about them and think they are
made to get violated... YES that is the spacefalcon we know and love ... *NOT*
wanna come shoot me once more? Or do you think
hi Joerg
>Can't find any such link to release notes in the howto
https://www.freecalypso.org/pipermail/community/2017-August/000452.html
for the beta release of the firmware (the moko13 release has no significant
changes from the beta) and
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> Please carefully note that this update is not based on the original licensed
> firmware for Openmoko devices,
Your original licensed firmware has bugs in it; the updated firmware
has some of these bugs fixed. Want examples? Here are just a few in
no particular order:
On Mon 28 August 2017 22:33:03 Mychaela Falconia wrote:
> > thus rendering any operation of the device outside controlled self-
> > contained lab environment illegal.
>
> Yup, just like using hormonal birth control from an overseas pharmacy
> without allowing a doctor to sexually violate you
> On the note of "if only we could properly finance you", I actually
> happen to know some very good recently retired ASIC design engineers,
> and if there were "proper" financing available, I might be able to
> convince them to come out of retirement and work on a libre LTE modem
> ASIC project
Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> Please advise how I may best encourage you to stop talking
> and take my money.
Take your money? Which product are you seeking to buy? An FCDEV3B
board? I am hoping to have those boards available for retail sale by
the end of September, i.e., only one month of
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> the moral aspects of calling somebody out for removing "no parking" signs so
> people would have to pay tickets for unknowingly parking there, or not telling
> people that they are in danger to even *do time in jail* when they install and
> use a firmware that person
12 matches
Mail list logo