Em 31-07-2010 01:02, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) escreveu:
On 26/07/2010 - 10.58 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
I have been using the qi with 2+4+2 timing over the weekend, and noted
two problems. (This with shr unstable and its 2.6.32 kernel.)
First, lots of WSODs. This required lots of
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Em 31-07-2010 01:02, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) escreveu:
On 26/07/2010 - 10.58 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
I have been using the qi with 2+4+2 timing over the weekend, and noted
two problems. (This with shr unstable and its 2.6.32 kernel.)
First, lots of
Nashvin Gangaram nashv...@gmail.com writes:
There is a list of Distributors here:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Distributors
There only seem to be 2 in North America (1 out of stock),
... and the other being a `special order'.
Wow. Is that it for GSM-850 FreeRunners, then?
I wonder...
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen
roz...@geekspace.com wrote:
Wow. Is that it for GSM-850 FreeRunners, then?
I wonder... what kind of coverage could one expect, in the US,
using one of the GSM-900 ones? I've looked at the maps, of course,
but somehow I have trouble believing
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:01 PM, jeremy jozwik jerjoz.for...@gmail.com wrote:
i have a 900 on t-mobile. have never had any issues with it.
gsm that is.. not nokia.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Joshua,
My experience with the 900 Mhz phones is that they work most of the
places that people go.
The 850s seemed to be in places where you wanted large physical coverage
or in hard environments. 850s seemed to be used by companies at the
seashore, in mountains, etc.
900 phones worked fine
6 matches
Mail list logo
