Timo,
You will find echo fixed in Openmoko's 2008.11 release, if you keep
using the Openmoko distro, and responsiveness and touch screen
usability will also improve with 2008.11 release. End call / accept
You are right that people are working on these things and fixes appear.
However, please
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:54:55 +0800 John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:05:16AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
x's internals are definitely up for improvement - callium3d is there to try
and fix this by providing a better more organised and better accelerated
2008/11/14 Gothnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It really needs work on the basics. I mean, responsiveness is not there,
interface is dodgy (the end call button being in the same spot as the
accept call button, and being unresponsive, made me hang up s many
calls). Echo on calls, battery life...
About the buzzin issue, I would like to be sure : is it or is it not
hardware related ? I heard about a soldering fix of one electronic
component which could get rid of the interferences...
Has anyone more information ?
Kimaidou
2008/11/17 Timo Jyrinki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/11/14 Gothnet
Le lundi 17 novembre 2008, kimaidou a écrit :
About the buzzin issue, I would like to be sure : is it or is it not
hardware related ? I heard about a soldering fix of one electronic
component which could get rid of the interferences...
Has anyone more information ?
It is hardware related and
So far, on the FR, I remain to be convinced that the use of X is the
critical performance issue. In any event, the main issue with
optimization efforts is whether they can proceed faster than the
introduction of better hardware. If a 400 Mhz machine is too slow,
will a 1 Ghz machine be fast
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:46 AM, kimaidou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok thanks, I have just read the hundreds if topics on it... the problem is
I am no electronicien so I did not understand if a workaround has been
found : I read about soldering, sticky tape. If there is a workaround,
is
It does require special skills and tools. If the posts in the hardware list
were not enough for you to see the fix then you shouldn't attempt it.
Angus
Hum
Sorry to ask again, but..
A solution has been found ? Or this solderings and pin things are for tests
purposes only ?
If the
Iain B. Findleton wrote:
the main issue with optimization efforts is whether they can proceed
faster than the
introduction of better hardware. If a 400 Mhz machine is too slow,
will a 1 Ghz machine be fast enough? Will anything be fast enough?
Apparently, from the history of desktops,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:05:16AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
x's internals are definitely up for improvement - callium3d is there to try
and fix this by providing a better more organised and better accelerated
driver
layer - but again - they aren't going to replace x... just clean up
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:49 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 07:22:29 + Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On 15 Nov 2008, at 07:08, Kishore wrote:
On Friday 14 Nov 2008 8:13:20 pm Gothnet wrote:
Also, I know everyone loves X, but is
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 07:22:29 + Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On 15 Nov 2008, at 07:08, Kishore wrote:
On Friday 14 Nov 2008 8:13:20 pm Gothnet wrote:
Also, I know everyone loves X, but is it really the best choice for
a low
powered device that needs a responsive UI?
...
On Saturday 15 Nov 2008 3:19:10 pm Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 07:22:29 + Stroller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On 15 Nov 2008, at 07:08, Kishore wrote:
On Friday 14 Nov 2008 8:13:20 pm Gothnet wrote:
Also, I know everyone loves X, but is it really the best choice for
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:07:25 +0530 Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Raster! Wow! Thanks for the detailed response. Really good to know :)
Well, I certainly do not think that direct fb is a better option over X. It
sure is crippling to not have multiple apps have access to the screen while
Hi Wolfgang,
i really appreciate the work you and all the OM-folks and the community does,
but:
You say the current software is a 'joke', which is painful for me but
I accept it. From where we all want to be it's a joke, yes. Agreed.
Well, for me, the software is not a joke. It's a little
To add my two pence-worth about the joke comment -
I have a very high tolerance to stuff not working. or not working smoothly.
Most of my computers are broken in some way at any given time. However, when
forced to rely on it for a month, even I got annoyed with the freerunner
running OM
I know the buzzing issue had quite a bit of attention from the Openmoko
team, judging from watching the traffic on the Hardware and Kernel mailing
lists. So I don't think they have given up on that, but it doesn't seem
like there is any set solution for current devices, only anecdotal reports
of
Jacob Peterson wrote:
I know the buzzing issue had quite a bit of attention from the Openmoko
team, judging from watching the traffic on the Hardware and Kernel mailing
lists. So I don't think they have given up on that, but it doesn't seem
like there is any set solution for current
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Jacob Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know the buzzing issue had quite a bit of attention from the Openmoko
team, judging from watching the traffic on the Hardware and Kernel mailing
lists. So I don't think they have given up on that, but it doesn't seem
On Friday 14 Nov 2008 8:13:20 pm Gothnet wrote:
Also, I know everyone loves X, but is it really the best choice for a low
powered device that needs a responsive UI?
I am just curious about this. I hope someone can comment on this. My thought
is that X is used because most apps that already
On 15 Nov 2008, at 07:08, Kishore wrote:
On Friday 14 Nov 2008 8:13:20 pm Gothnet wrote:
Also, I know everyone loves X, but is it really the best choice for
a low
powered device that needs a responsive UI?
...
I still would like to know more in terms of performance and memory
21 matches
Mail list logo
