First modifications on Cooker seem to come to a halt, indicating that 9.1 is
finished; then it appears that an RC3 has been released, and now my overnight
rsync has produced an updates/9.1 directory.
What is the official position?
--
John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL
H. Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Giuseppe wrote:
w9ya wrote:
Austin wrote: [for me, thanks Austin!]
The best times of the 4 were:
athlon-xp:12.16
i586: 13.24
i586, no mmx: 57.65
Honestly I never found yet a package
that will increase
performance of even 10% just
- Original Message -
From: David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: [Cooker] Re: problem for resolving domain names after connecting a
LAN
Eric Fernandez wrote:
David : just a question about my problem. I try to understand
Dag,
Sorry for the late reply.
Axel Thimm forwarded me here about something I'm implementing in my
buildsystem. I was fed up with Makefiles writing outside the buildroot
and I wrote a library yesterday that overloads the glibc functions
(systemcalls) and checks some conditions before
Ainsi parlait eddie :
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
html
Please use standard text for email.
Then you should talk to Texstar @ Pclinuxonline. He had a great system
with apt-get and Synaptic that worked with a Gui and worked wonderful,
although he doesn't have
John Allen wrote:
First modifications on Cooker seem to come to a halt, indicating that 9.1 is
finished; then it appears that an RC3 has been released, and now my overnight
rsync has produced an updates/9.1 directory.
What is the official position?
Read the mail sent one week ago called 9.1
Oden Eriksson wrote:
-Conflicts: uw-imap courier-imap
+Conflicts: uw-imap courier-imap cyrus-imapd
This is silly, this way for each new imap server the spec file of all
the others have to be updated just to correct the Conflicts.
There should be a better way and it doesn't matter that
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
True. What I've noticed (at least at MDK) that people aren't
interested in a clean build environment. They just want their
packages to build and not to worry about (useless?) stuff like
BuildRequires.
no. we're many that're happy with better
John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First modifications on Cooker seem to come to a halt, indicating that 9.1 is
finished; then it appears that an RC3 has been released, and now my overnight
rsync has produced an updates/9.1 directory.
What is the official position?
We are about to
Hi,
Is there any reason, why the sasl packages version 1.5.28 and 2.1.12 are
stored together in one source rpm?
Martin
--
H E L I X Gesellschaft für Software Engineering mbH
True. What I've noticed (at least at MDK) that people aren't
interested in a clean build environment. They just want their
packages to build and not to worry about (useless?) stuff like
BuildRequires.
no. we're many that're happy with better buildrequires/requires.
but this is less
Is there any reason, why the sasl packages version 1.5.28 and 2.1.12 are
stored together in one source rpm?
1/ RedHat also does it
2/ All packages (still) require sasl7
3/ sasl2 needs to be in the distro
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:02, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 21:51, Jason Greenwood a écrit :
Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
Nowadays, all the CD are 700M except some RW.
A their cost is
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reinout van Schouwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
There are a number of pretty serious bug still, and I would hate to see
Mandrake 9.1 ship as cooker currently is. Some of them are trivial to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
eddie wrote:
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Then you should talk to Texstar @ Pclinuxonline.
Tex can speak for himself, though he doesn't seem to like cooker ...
He had a great system
with apt-get and Synaptic that worked with a Gui and worked
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:35:02PM +0100, François Pons wrote:
Any other idea are wellcome.
I'd suggest making it possible to query packages that are not installed. The
best thing I could achieve is to dump the raw headers with urpmq which is not
easy to read.
I used to use rpmdrake to search
tateopfr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3458
Product: Installation
Component: libsasl2-plug-ntlm
Summary: mdk91.rc2 : dd if=./images/hd.img of=/dev/fd0 erase
hd.img!!
Version: 1.799
zeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3334
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 01:05 ---
I found a solution. Since it is a esd problem, you can use SDL as audio output
starting the client with :
civclient -P sdl
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
zeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3334
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 01:05 ---
I found a solution. Since it is a esd problem, you can use SDL as audio output
starting the client with :
Am Dienstag, 25. März 2003 12:30 schrieb Stefan van der Eijk:
Is there any reason, why the sasl packages version 1.5.28 and 2.1.12 are
stored together in one source rpm?
1/ RedHat also does it
Hm
2/ All packages (still) require sasl7
Ok, that is a reason to install libsasl7 but to bundle
Texstar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a list of packages in cooker that will not appear on the mdk 9.1 CDs?
I know the OO help files and kdeartwork won't but are there any other ones?
Depends if you include the contrib inside or not.
From contribs only 680 packages out of 2500 were
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3510
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3432
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 09:34 ---
i see same problem on compaq ml370 server with one processor. booting with
noapic don't help, because kernel ignore this parameter (??) and apic setting
can be set only
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3293
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3293
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 09:55 ---
I have same problems.
I was running cooker since several months updated daily without problem.
Since one or two weeks ago, I have several crashes, probably X: the X
On Tue 25 Mar 2003 03:05, Guillaume Rousse posted as excerpted below:
Ainsi parlait eddie :
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
html
Please use standard text for email.
No kidding!
Then you should talk to Texstar @ Pclinuxonline. He had a great system
with
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3348
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3294
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3270
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 10:42 ---
yes, I have tried RC2 installation and this problem is still valid
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Giuseppe;
Actually my remarks were (mostly) meant for Adam. Sorry about that., I think I
am agreeing with you, at least in part. The RPM building option you mention
is interesting.
Hmmm...well, can I get your input on an article on freshmeat? The URL is
On Monday, March 24, 2003 06:50 pm, Mario Vazquez wrote:
/home/me/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.54272: line 38: unexpected EOF while looking for
matching ``'
You have a syntax error in script /home/me/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.54272 (missing
single quote or backtick). Identify the problem in the script then correct
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3524
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Component|drakconf
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3235
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3527
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
I'm using a dedicated machine (in a VMware) to do this at the moment.
A normal user performs the rebuilding, so damage to the system should
be limited.
When Jeff Garzik was still employed at Mandrakesoft we discussed using
a chroot() environment to build packages. The idea was to install a
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
Product: kdebase
Component: i18n
Summary: some fonts in Russian locale are missing
Version: 3.1-83mdk
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
Before something like this is implemented, the current FUNDEMENTAL
breakage in the dependancies of the -devel packages needs to be
resolved. My experience with finding the right BuildRequires is that
due to the fact that the dependancies for -devel packages are not
automatically found it's
Ainsi parlait Stefan van der Eijk :
I'm using a dedicated machine (in a VMware) to do this at the moment.
A normal user performs the rebuilding, so damage to the system should
be limited.
When Jeff Garzik was still employed at Mandrakesoft we discussed using
a chroot() environment to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
On Topic:
Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of these
duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light theme is also
included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can excluded
I'm currently downloading 9.1rc3...
Is it the same as final release ? I mean, is it just renamed ISOs of final release ?
Alexander Tereschenko
Administrator of http://www.tvs.tv/
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web-site: http://www.tereschenko.com/
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3510
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 13:10 ---
Thanks Frederic,
I should have checked the Evolution bugzilla before I logged this to
Mandrake.
Rich
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 03:31, fcrozat wrote:
!DOCTYPE HTML
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3385
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 13:51 ---
I did found, that by default install mysql user does not exist at the install
time. I have created one and uninstalled mysql. After second installation of
mysql it
Need to setup a SF project for the scripts...
May i suggest joining youri project instead (see http://youri.zarb.org),
and make automatic and safe package building one of the objectives of
the project ?
Good one. I will.
I subscribed to the mailing list. Continue the slbd related discussion
On Mon 24 Mar 2003 09:34, Duncan posted as excerpted below:
On Mon 24 Mar 2003 06:56, Pixel posted as excerpted below:
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.. I was pretty disgusted with DiskDrake as well, after I'd put a
bunch of comments in detialing the various mount options, ran
On Topic:
Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of
these duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light
theme is also included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can
excluded from a job.
How about %exclude ?
That one is new to me.
And wouldn't
On Tue 25 Mar 2003 07:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted as excerpted below:
I'm currently downloading 9.1rc3...
Is it the same as final release ? I mean, is it just renamed ISOs of final
release ?
According to the other threads on this list, probably so... That's what they
did for 9.0, and they
I agree!
I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this clear.
I'm also d/loading them and wonder what I'll find, when I install!
Mike
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:36 PM
Subject: [Cooker] 9.1final
I agree!
I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this
clear.
I'm also d/loading them and wonder what I'll find, when I install!
Mike
If they do that, it is to avoid their server to be saturated. Thus we can
have more mirrors with the final.
BTW, club members will
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 13:58 ---
I have got, the same or equal problem with the Intel audion on ICH4 Mainboard
(MSI) with 9.1RC2, I found out, that by defoult it try to start alsa and oss
driver at
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3524
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Additional Comments From
Hello Daouda,
AFAIR, i received mail from some cooker volunteers to help with this.
Yes, I was one of them. Many translators don't follow the cooker list though.
None of this volunteers have reported bad issues, in fact there were
no report. No news, good news.
W.r.t. the mdkkdm issue, this
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3524
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 14:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=394)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=394action=view)
lspcidrake -v output
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3531
Product: Bugzilla
Component: Bugzilla
Summary: Wrong component: libsasl-plug-ntlm
Version: 2.17
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Hi everybody,
I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?
Regards
Bernd
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2989
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:13:46PM -, Mike Diack wrote:
| I agree!
| I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this clear.
We received this mail right now:
--
Dear Mandrake Mirror,
If you don't have any time just leave this message.
The
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2896
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Thanks for clarifying
- Original Message -
From: Vlastimil Holer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:13:46PM -, Mike Diack wrote:
| I agree!
| I hate to say it - but
Bernd Niederberger wrote:
Hi everybody,
I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?
Looks like X11R6-contrib is not on CDs. You can get it from a cooker mirror.
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake/iso/:
03/24/2003 01:17682,164,224 Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
03/24/2003 01:19681,279,488 Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
03/24/2003 01:22681,574,400 Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
05/11/2001 12:00 2,050 README
-Original
Oups!
Sorry for the read receipt request
-Original Message-
From: Ribeiro Fernando
Sent: terça-feira, 25 de Março de 2003 18:03
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake/iso/:
03/24/2003 01:17682,164,224
Am Dienstag, 25. März 2003 11:54 schrieb Guillaume Cottenceau:
John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First modifications on Cooker seem to come to a halt,
indicating that 9.1 is finished; then it appears that an RC3
has been released, and now my overnight rsync has produced an
updates/9.1
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2769
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 16:41 ---
wrong component...
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3532
Product: Bugzilla
Component: Bugzilla
Summary: i18n component showed as documentation
Version: 2.17
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 17:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=395)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=395action=view)
Roughly the same page in Gnome
Here is a screenshot from Gnome
I am
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 04:08, Duncan wrote:
On Tue 25 Mar 2003 03:05, Guillaume Rousse posted as excerpted below:
Ainsi parlait eddie :
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
html
Please use standard text for email.
No kidding!
Then you should talk to
It seems to be the same trick . Just finished the download.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, andre wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2003 19:48, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2 and, at
the moment, they are named rc3!!!
Is a rc3
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 17:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=396)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=396action=view)
another screenshot
The problem is still present, to a lesser degree
Hi.
On Tue 2003-03-25 at 15:13:46 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree!
I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this clear.
Well, they do this for a purpose and announcing it would defeat that
purpose, wouldn't it?
I'm also d/loading them and wonder what I'll find,
Hello,
I wanted to install recent coreutils (in case it might solve some
strange things with latest urpmi have weird option for cp when doing
urpmi.update -a), but to do that I needed to upgrade makedev. When I
urpmi it (or rpm the cache), it gets stuck in the preparing stage,
taking 100 % cpu. I
On Tue 2003-03-25 at 10:24:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Of course, doing it all in a nicely scrolling Konsole window works fine for
me, here, but if we are going to have a GUI, we might as well make it a
decently functional one, usable by power users as well as newbies, and
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 17:33 ---
Could you try removing your Windows fonts (ie using only fonts provided by
MandrakeSoft) ?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
Product: gdm
Component: program
Summary: gdm and configuration refresh
Version: 2.4.1.3-5mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last.
I just downloaded the 3 CD set.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ ll
total 1999064
- -rw---1 lea lea 682164224 mar 24 14:17
Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
- -rw---1 lea lea 681279488 mar 24
Lea Gris wrote:
9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last.
The ISO-images are also shared in file exchange networks, like edonkey,
gnutella or directconnect.
The edonkey/mldonkey links are:
ed2k://|file|Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso|682164224|7422d9374a1bd9187254de638f47c7d3|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2928
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 2:14 pm, Lea Gris wrote:
9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last.
I just downloaded the 3 CD set.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ ll
total 1999064
-rw---1 lea lea 682164224 mar 24 14:17
Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
-rw---1 lea lea 681279488 mar
On Monday 24 March 2003 21:51, Jason Greenwood wrote:
Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
Cheers
Jason
Talking about 650MB ISO's. What is the decision for hamer and itanic. Will
they also have 650 ISO's or 700 ISO's. I think 700 ISO would be normal for
them
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3458
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 19:20 ---
At first I supposed my mistake
then I try with a second file and it happen again
with the right sintax
dd if=hd.img of=/dev/fd0
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 12:20 pm, gc
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
Product: kdebase
Component: kdebase
Summary: KDE window streaked on laptop
Version: 3.1-83mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 19:42 ---
On a fresh install of 9.1RC3
Opening home in KDE, clicking on /mnt in the folders tree on the left, watching
KDE hang. impossible to close. Xkill takes forever
All
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 19:53 ---
Bug still persists when creating a new directory on the desktop and opening the
trash.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 20:12 ---
I think I mixed the package name up. It should be perl-Convert-ASN1, not
perl-ASN1-Convert.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3231
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-25 20:13 ---
I can confirm that this is a FTP-only bug. Using the RC3 (aka final) ISOs, the
installation works.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to email this (I'm not a member of
the list), but I wasn't sure where to send this info. I thought that
either this email list would be the right place, or someone on this list
could send it on to the right place for me.
Anyway, at
Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the
following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been
happening for a couple of months now.)
o I cannot type in mozilla, i.e. text entry fields stop working.
I can fix this by
o Switching to a terminal and
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 03:11, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:02, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 21:51, Jason Greenwood a écrit :
Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
hi
this happens to me too, its very strange, I thought it was due to me
having a recompiled mozill with gcc 3.2, but the problem exists with the
normal cooker mozilla too
- its only recently started happening for me though.
Cheers
cris.
Richard Ketchersid wrote:
Very often now when running
Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
On Topic:
Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of these
duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light theme is also
included in icewm. Would be nice if
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 14:49, Richard Ketchersid wrote:
Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the
following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been
happening for a couple of months now.)
o I cannot type in mozilla, i.e. text entry fields stop
It's in the X11R6-contrib package.
Bernd Niederberger wrote:
Hi everybody,
I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?
Regards
Bernd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 02:49 pm, Richard Ketchersid wrote:
Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the
following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been
happening for a couple of months now.)
o I
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
