Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One would have to ask How many different 9.0s are there?.
A release is a release, it is singular. A subsequent release
cannot bear the same number, since it is a different thing.
So what is the release name of what is now on ftp.sunet.se?
9.0.1?
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
There are two problems:
- there are packages we don't put on ISO's because for whatever
reason we don't want to have more than 2/3/whatever ISO's, so
there are some packages which are only available in the tree
version
- due to overloaded mirrors, the
Vincent Danen wrote:
Nope, haven't tried that. But considering it's getting late tonight,
I won't try it. However, I will give it a shot tomorrow afternoon on
the machine that I mirror cooker on. I'll report back once I've
accomplished the install.
Of course, this is very easy to
David Walluck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I appologize if I am rehashing what is already posted, but I can no
longer follow the original intent of this thread.
Just want to say that I've tried the FTP install from several mirrors
(sunet, rpmfind), and both fail nearly immeditaely due to the
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vincent Danen wrote:
9.0 is perfectly fine.
Have you tried an hd.img install on an empty partition from the
9.0 tree, install, expert, all client groups selected, no package
selection?
It crashes because it expects an hdlist2.cz file which is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
| At first we've not noticed this problem because it's not in the
| ISO's and many people use the ISO's. Apparently it's was a mess
| when trying to disable the contrib use during install for the
| 9.0. Warly have fixed
David Walluck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| The problem is that the depslist computation is tied to the
| number and contents of the hdlists..
|
But, what about adding another field, would that not be useful?
hdlist.cz Mandrake/RPMS Installation CD required
hdlist2.cz
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Yep, I've just answered to David Walluck about this problem. It
has been fixed by Warly this morning. Hopefully, that bug isn't
present in the official ISO's of the 9.0.
God Bless You!
We do need the 9.0 tree fixed as well as the ISOs. At this moment the
3610
Vincent Danen wrote:
Of course, this is very easy to disprove as well. Perhaps your troels
script needs to be fixed or something.
No, Guillaume has confirmed the problem and Warly has now fixed it.
--
Ron. [Melbourne, Australia]
New Web site: http://members.optusnet.com.au/ronst/
Ben Reser wrote:
I have it on my local mirror but I have --delete turned off on the
Mandrake tree for the time beeing since I have a copy of the cooker
contribs waiting for contribs to show so I don't have to redownload
them.
If you look at the structure of the mirrors you will see that
Ben Reser wrote:
Actually now that I think about it. I probably have it because I copied
my cooker tree over there to speed up 9.0 downloading...
So did I, but my rsync has --delete, so if it did not arrive here, then
it was not on the ftp.uninett.no server, and if in my cooker tree would
To satisfy my curiousity I checked both ftp.uninett.no and ftp.sunet.se,
which is the mirror I prefer. You are correct that ftp.uninett.no has
not been modified, but ftp.sunet.se has been.
The most like situation is that there is some lag in the uninett.no
mirror being updated. I've found
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 04:14:50 +1000
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f you look at the structure of the mirrors you will see that there is
no such thing as cooker contribs - just contribs (presumably one fits
all releases g).
The contrib for cooker is under
--- Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you look at the structure of the mirrors you will
see that there is
no such thing as cooker contribs - just contribs
au contrare (yes I spelled that wrong), from a mirror
that has Mandrake-old, we see 8.2 contrib
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 04:14:50 +1000
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f you look at the structure of the mirrors you will see that there is
no such thing as cooker contribs - just contribs (presumably one fits
all releases g).
The contrib for cooker is under
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 12:10 PM, Ron Stodden wrote:
Of course, this is very easy to disprove as well. Perhaps your
troels script needs to be fixed or something.
No, Guillaume has confirmed the problem and Warly has now fixed it.
Yeah, I noticed that. I was looking at the
Scott Chevalley wrote:
To satisfy my curiousity I checked both ftp.uninett.no and ftp.sunet.se,
which is the mirror I prefer. You are correct that ftp.uninett.no has
not been modified, but ftp.sunet.se has been.
The most like situation is that there is some lag in the uninett.no
mirror
David Walser wrote:
--- Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you look at the structure of the mirrors you will
see that there is
no such thing as cooker contribs - just contribs
au contrare (yes I spelled that wrong), from a mirror
that has Mandrake-old, we see 8.2 contrib
On Sat Sep 28 8:21 +1000, Ron Stodden wrote:
The problem with ftp.sunet.se is that it carries a too-large Message of
the Day (MOTD), occupying a whole screen and disturbing users from
following what is going on.ftp.uninett.no removed their MOTD months
ago and so is much easier to use.
On Sat Sep 28 8:25 +1000, Ron Stodden wrote:
I can only wonder what it all means...
I can only wonder how many times you were dropped on your head as a
child, but that really has nothing to do with this.
The fact is, there is a contrib branch for cooker, living in the
Now I'm new to cooker and all, but I've noticed this trend of you bitching
about everyone on here. Kinda makes me wonder how anything ever gets done at
mandrake when they all have to put up with you bitching all the time.
Come on, Linux is not supposed to be some angry, upset community. We
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 04:14:50 +1000
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f you look at the structure of the mirrors you will see that there is
no such thing as cooker contribs - just contribs (presumably one fits
all releases g).
The contrib for cooker is
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Forest C. Adcock wrote:
Now I'm new to cooker and all, but I've noticed this trend of you bitching
about everyone on here. Kinda makes me wonder how anything ever gets done at
mandrake when they all have to put up with you bitching all the time.
People new to this list
You are scaring me. The mirrors are flooded with people grinding out 24 hr
downloads of these isos. Getting straight to the point,do they install or
not? Should we wait for a bug fix and cut our ftp connections or what?
-Original Message-
From: Levi Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:06:22 -0400 Litwack, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are scaring me. The mirrors are flooded with people grinding out 24 hr
downloads of these isos. Getting straight to the point,do they install or
not? Should we wait for a bug fix and cut our ftp connections or what?
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 01:06 PM, Litwack, Paul wrote:
You are scaring me. The mirrors are flooded with people grinding out
24 hr
downloads of these isos. Getting straight to the point,do they install
or
not? Should we wait for a bug fix and cut our ftp connections or what?
Quoting Alastair Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:06:22 -0400 Litwack, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You are scaring me. The mirrors are flooded with people grinding out
24 hr
downloads of these isos. Getting straight to the point,do they install
or
not? Should we wait
Vincent Danen wrote:
9.0 is perfectly fine.
Have you tried an hd.img install on an empty partition from the 9.0
tree, install, expert, all client groups selected, no package selection?
It crashes because it expects an hdlist2.cz file which is not there.
Providing an empty file and
On Fri Sep 27 11:17 +1000, Ron Stodden wrote:
Vincent Danen wrote:
9.0 is perfectly fine.
Have you tried an hd.img install on an empty partition from the 9.0
tree, install, expert, all client groups selected, no package selection?
It crashes because it expects an hdlist2.cz file which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I appologize if I am rehashing what is already posted, but I can no
longer follow the original intent of this thread.
Just want to say that I've tried the FTP install from several mirrors
(sunet, rpmfind), and both fail nearly immeditaely due to the
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Ron Stodden wrote:
9.0 is perfectly fine.
Have you tried an hd.img install on an empty partition from the 9.0
tree, install, expert, all client groups selected, no package
selection?
It crashes because it expects an hdlist2.cz file which is
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:05:28PM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
Hmmm... seems like the file you're saying is missing (and also implying
is our fault) is in fact there... Again, check your troels (or
whatever you call it) script to make sure it's not missing stuff.
This is on a machine
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:47:43PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
It was there initially but has since been deleted.
[root@stream base]# rsync carroll.cac.psu.edu::mandrake/9.0/i586/Mandrake/base/ |
grep hdlist
-rw-r--r--15018395 2002/09/25 02:37:51 hdlist.cz
-rw-r--r-- 77 2002/08/14
33 matches
Mail list logo
