Hi,
Where is the sheep_net rpm? I have been trying to locate such a thing
to enable me to use networking with BasiliskII JIT, however, though
these seemed to exist in the past I cant find them now...
sheepnet module is integrated to our kernel now.
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Ben Reser wrote:
IBM or Unisys patent? Both of them have a patent. Don't ask me how
that happened. Stupid USPTO.
Unisys. And yes, stupid patent offices sometimes accept both identical
processes.
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Todd Franklin wrote:
Just forwarding a quick font fix for the Open Office dialogs that make
it a bit more pleasing to the eye.
This is already carried out in 1.0.1 mdk releases.
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Henri wrote:
There is a VERY annoying bug with msec at level for : ooffice won't
launch for users which are not in the group allowed to see config files,
as selected during installation.
The problem was even worse than that. :-/
Please correct this, I don't want to make
Hi,
The problem was even worse than that. :-/
Thanks for reply ! So what is really the problem ? what do you mean by
even worse ?
launch for users which are not in the group allowed to see config
files is not enough. Actually, OOo needs access to /proc/pid/cmdline,
which is not available
On 16 Sep 2002, Austin Acton wrote:
They are not available in the file-new menu. (but should be)
They are available ONLY by going to file-new-open and then looking in
/usr/lib/openoffice/share/templates/english
Note, I first considered as templates the File-New (Business Cards,
Labels)
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Dan Clayton wrote:
I had open office on my system before and it worked fine. I tried to
install the version from RC2 and it couldn't copy many of the files into
/usr/lib/openoffice. I tried as root, my regular user and my dummy user
and they all failed to copy needed
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, allen wrote:
What will the process be that Mandrake will go through to
make a 9.x available for new AMD and Intel 64bit chips ?
There will be an MDK 9.x for x86-64 cpus when they are released. There
*is* a version for Itanium 1 but that's an 8.1.
2. OpenOffice doesn't start as user, but it does as root. Here you
have the
errors shown when started from a console:
That happens because you haven't installed the right package for your
locale (es_ES?) and you have not installed default language package
(English). Solution for the user,
Hi,
I was trying the OpenOffice software on my computer.
Athlon 650 +512meg on an Asus k7m and ATI AIW 128 under KDE
I receive this :
[...]
Ouch !
Indeed, I am telling the same thing when I am trying to guess more
information on your installation, which I can't. So, please give useful
Hi,
I have chosen Russian language (CP-1251) for intallation of 9.0rc3. But
all
applications of Open-office appear with blank squares instead of Russian
letters in menus. The same problem was in rc2...
Hey, no, really that should not happen any more. :-( Please make sure
you have
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, George Czerw wrote:
As installed in Mandrake 9 RC3, OpenOffice 1.0.1 will not run if invoked
from the KDE menu items. When, as user, I ran the setup routine from
/usr/lib/openoffice, the setup routine still did not copy the needed bash
script files and subdirectories
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, denis bergeron wrote:
I use fr_CA all my local was fr_CA and my OpenOffice.org was fr so It
suppose to work.
Yes, and it works here, with the same packages set minus -l10n-en.
1) Have you ever run a prior installation of StarOffice or OpenOffice.org?
In that case,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, denis bergeron wrote:
OpenOffice crash on local fr_CA
Ouch, I can't reproduce it here. :-( Please try to strace -eopen ooffice
--lang fr open.log, provided you have done the regular removal of
.sversionrc, .openoffice, .user60.rdb and -l10n-fr is installed.
And send me
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, denis bergeron wrote:
I look at file... mayby it's because I install the TurboLinux Driver for
the Canon s500 printer, they have a printer driver for this canon
printer, and Mandrake don't have it !
How have you installed it there (oohome/share/psprint/driver/*): manual
On 27 Sep 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Just installed 9.0, and found out CPP doesn't work: /usr/lib is a symlink
to /etc/alternatives/lib_cpp, which in turn doesn't exists.
Installed or upgraded?
To fix alternatives problem with gcc in general, ppl should use:
#
Hi,
Now i installed MDK 9.0 and ofcourse gcc3.x don't work
This can't be a valid statement without evidence.
so i add the gcc2.x packages to the system and try to compile
gcc-2.X and gcc-3.X are C++ binary incompatible. Period. In that case,
if code is properly written, it is enough to
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
The problem is I couldn't upload any new glibc, so not for 9.0 release.
Now that 9.0 is out, could this be done ?
Yes, but not _now_ either. Cooker is still cold nowadays.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, denis bergeron wrote:
And I find this strange folder hiearchie when I zip the files :
adding:
home/denis/.openoffice/user/work/.openoffice/user/work/.openoffice/use
~/.openoffice/user/work is a symlink to the user's home directory.
Otherwise, when opening files the
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, denis wrote:
- I install without trouble starOffice, which work fine
- I install OpenOffice from OpenOffice.org1.0.1.tar.gz without pb
- I install Openoffice (using rpms) it doesn't work !
This is usually a bad idea to follow this pattern, especially if your are
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Peter Ruskin wrote:
rpmdrake says:
Conflicts detected:
libstdc++.so.4 is needed by audacity-1.0.0-3mdk
libstdc++.so.4(GLIBCPP_3.1) is needed by audacity-1.0.0-3mdk
Install aborted
AFAICS, audacity is not in 9.0. All packages with broken/inexistent
dependencies are
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Hola from Lauber wrote:
I installed the version of OpenOffice that came with 9.0 to find that
there were two components missing on my system: the help system and,
more disappointingly, the spell-checker.
Disappointingly, users don't read package information prior to
Hi,
When I got this I tried again to continue with make, and it worked for a
while, stopping in a new fail.
Then, this is not a gcc bug. Bugs with gcc are deterministic, not random.
i.e. it shall reproduce with the same steps. Otherwise, it's more likely
an environment failure (bad RAM,
Hi,
I'm trying to think of a situation where someone would install
openoffice.org and not want spell-checking enabled.. and I can't
think of one.
Spellchecking is not available yet for his language?
Maybe others experiences are different, but I think people just expect
Hi,
Ahhh yes, very true! But for all others, I think it's a good idea to
put the spelling packages in place automatically.
This is actually done already. However, there may be several packages
for a given language. e.g. English (GB) or English (US), which one to
install? myspell-*-1.0.1
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Buchan Milne wrote:
Alternatives? (no, I don't mean other options, I mean user
update-alternatives etc). But that would require someone fixing kaffe
and gcj to do so too.
??? This is already the case for months now...
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 11:43, Florent BERANGER wrote:
What can it break ?
Java and WINE, for starters.
Sun fixed compatibility with glibc 2.3.X in JDK 1.4.1, IIRC. As for
Wine, I would like more information.
Thanks,
Gwenole.
Hi,
I was reading on the openbsd-ports list and they just added this patch:
http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/
to gcc3.2. Is this a patch that may be interesting to Mandrake as well?
Will check again, had seen this some time ago. Problem is there are many
similar projects being
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Jason Straight wrote:
Does this mean it's using xfree86 dri code for 7500 or gatos still?
This means it's still using gatos (AFAIK) and my ATI Radeon 7500 is now
working. But I have not tested on an IA-32 machine though.
This should solve issues with gatos dri code
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, J.A. Magallón wrote:
How about 2.13.90.0.4 in
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/
Next binutils will be 2.13.90.0.10 for gcc-3.2-rhl8-branch for
glibc-2.3-branch. First, need to finish the current cycle.
Bye,
Gwenole.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
We researched into staroffice and what we found is that it advertized
being able to import *.wpd files, ecclent.
Where is it advertised? AFAIK, there is no WordPerfect filter implemented
yet for OOo and possibly for StartOffice too. This may have
Hi,
Great, but it seems rpm doesn't find dependencies anymore. Here is an
rpm which I built on cooker ...
Dependencies are not changed. So they work as before. Look at XFree86
package built with new rpm, dependencies are all there.
Only find-provides was fixed to not get rid of some files.
Hi,
How do you deal with this type of files, all are packaged under %doc,
but
rpm-build failed: (actually I `rm` it in spec)
rm it from where? Under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? Then that's normal, %doc file
is not meant to have file installed under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
So, if you have in your build dir,
Hi,
But this is not possible because building failed now. I want just
confirmation about the better way to build without including this files.
I retranslate my reply. ;-)
make install shall not install %doc files. That's all. So, either you
remove those files from $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, either you
Hi,
I don't agree: I suppose that mandrakesoft has an automated build
procedure, a warning will probably go unnoticed, while a package that
fails to build will surely get a maintaner attention. The result will
be many less broken packages (I hope).
Exactly! Too maintainers simply don't care
Hi,
Hoo, think to poeple who rebuild about 2000 packages for ppc or alpha,
who
have already to fix lot of packager error about arch specific pb... who
have
already to deal with reject upload.
This *is* useful for ports. Do you think I added this for fun?
Bye,
Gwenole.
Hi,
OTOH I have seen quite a few RPMS that were build only on the packagers
machine. That person rpm now depends on libraries that exist on his
machine the don't exist in mdk-cooker.
Huh, which packages? This can't be true anymore as there are machine
checks. Yeah, that was possible
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Levi Ramsey wrote:
There are quite a few packages in Cooker right now that depend on
libnewt.so.50, while the Cooker version is libnewt.so.51. Are the snf
and pump packages going to be rebuilt or removed from Cooker?
All packages will soon be rebuilt anyway.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
Does this include the preemption patch or low latency patch?
Or indeed the NGPT (Posix Threads) changes ?
Most of NGPT changes should be there. However that's not the goal for ia32
branch. Probably post 9.1, we'll use NPTL instead and a backport of
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Just tried with 2.4.20-0.1mdk, also compiled with gcc3.2, and it freezes.
It doesn't even print an Oops, just hangs, and alt+sysrq doesn't work.
What? where? That could simply be a broken module. When compiling with gcc
= 3.0 and something is failing
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Fortunately, gcc3.2 has a new option to warn about code that breaks
aliasing rule. Needless to say, such code needs fixing.
Could you tell me the warning message, so I check if I see it in the
compilation messages? (and, will it appear with
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Han Boetes wrote:
Please test and comment and submit.
First we review diffs and I have comments:
- Why the following change?
%build
+export PNG_NO_SETJMP_SUPPORTED=1
%make
make test
- I don't know why they have left the comment as is. But I would expect
it to be guard
Hi,
after updating against latest cooker today(it's been a few days since
last time) things suddenly started to use distcc as standard compiler,
even if distcc was'nt installed!
I don't know why, but this also happened when compiling on klama..
And let me guess, you get screwed cpp, gcc links
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Now I kinda wonder what would be the right way(tm) to solve/work
around this problem... Maybe I should just add distcc to BuildRequires
for now...
Should be fixed in python-2.2.2-2mdk.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Han Boetes wrote:
I wanted to suggest the addition of a few macros in /usr/lib/rpm/macros
for X packages: Patch included.
Yes, could be a good idea, but rebuilding for older distro won't be
compatible unless we provide updated macros there too. I have been using
%x11prefix
On 25 Nov 2002, Robert Fox wrote:
Anyone try Mandrake Cooker with an Intel 3.06 with Hyper Threading?
Any tests with the AMD Athelon 64 (formerly known as Clawhammer)?
No, no.
I'm in the market for a new machine and not sure if I should wait for
the Athelon 64 (next three months)
Athlon 64
On 26 Nov 2002, Adam Williamson wrote:
[adamw@aw280 adamw]$ alsamixergui
alsamixergui: Symbol `_ZTV9Fl_Pixmap' has different size in shared
object, consider re-linking
vtable.
alsamixergui: relocation error: alsamixergui: undefined symbol:
_Z7fl_clip
fl_clip(int, int, int, int);
You
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
You are likely mixing gcc3 and gcc2 binaries.
Or have not installed the right fltk library.
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Owen Savill wrote:
Going back to binutils2 and libbinutils2 that came with the stock 9.0
fixes the problem.
Hope this helps,
It would help if you provide a testcase because I simply can't read in
people mind, I am afraid. So please tell me where are you seing this file
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Thomas Rösch wrote:
you find License:
MPlayer is GPL now. In the past it contained non-GPL code from the
OpenDivX project, which did not allow binary redistribution. This has
been removed.
So mplayer should be OK.
As Giuseppe said, the problem may go beyond a
Hi,
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/{%_lib}/modules/ -name '*.o'|xargs gzip -9f
Please don't. Kernel modules remain in /lib/modules* regardless of the
architecture. I will make rpmlint exceptions for those.
Bye,
Gwenole.
Hi,
$ ohphone
ohphone: relocation error: ohphone: undefined symbol: __ti7PThread
I have just uploaded 1.2.11-1mdk, untested. Please give it a try. This
thing is ultra dependent on openh323, unfortunately MDK 9.0 shipped with
one totally incompatible to rebuild ohphone.
Maintainer will take
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Pavol Cvengros wrote:
I have just one question, why isn't gcc-3.2.1 in cooker, is there
any reason for that ?
It is already 3.2.1 here. Version reported is not important, features and
fixes are.
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, RA wrote:
I wonder, if this is also the case for building on cooker?
Nope, as you can see all tests must pass and they do on ia32 and x86-64.
Bye,
Gwenole.
Try:
- Strip libpthread-* (yes!) strip --strip-unneeded /lib/libpthread-0.9.so
- Install glibc-debug package, and follow the procedure
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, [Bug 596] wrote:
This is an old problem never fix:
1) splitting Windows cause a segfault
2) Menu - open file, a new windows is create bug we can't act on it (menu, or key
not
responding)
I can't reproduce that with nedit 5.3-2mdk, please check it out.
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, [Bug 600] wrote:
I have source code which uses the string class (#include string).
With previous versions of mandrake 8.0 etc. this code compiled correctly.
Program bug. string class is in namespace std.
@resolution=fixed
Hi,
Confirmed, mplayer-0.90-0.pre10.3mdk from cooker compiles just fine with
gcc-3.2-4mdk from cooker (all rebuilt on ML9.0). Wierd...
IIRC, you are just hiding the problem. Add -momit-leaf-frame-pointer and
you should get again into troubles. If this is the case, code should
probably be
Hi,
Workaround: relinking junk2.so with '-lc' magically cures the bug:
$ ld -shared -o junk2.so junk2.o -lc
And this is the correct invocation AFAIK. i.e. people willing to create
a DSO with ld directly are supposed to explicitly add the C library
(-lc). gcc -shared -o junk2.so junk2.o,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, [Bug 596] wrote:
Bug is still here, confirm by pterjan on it cooker install.
We have nedit-5.3-2mdk !
Yeah, procedure was not clear enough. Nedit segfaults in
_XmSetEtchedSlider(). Titi's stuff probably.
@bug_status=reopened
Hi,
Package has been badly build (using contrib instead of only main)
rpmmon is your friend. This day, I received 3 reports concerning
packages I don't maintain...
Giuseppe, either rebuild with something --without-blas or whatever
(R-Base configure is smart and finds out whatever it finds
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [Bug 393] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-14 19:23
---
I am running a Cooker system and have glibc-2.2.5-19mdk installed
but that did not solve the problem. As a temporary fix,
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug gdb ./t
does
Mac, concerning glibc, -22mdk is now reasonable with even a glibc-debug
package with all debugging symbols you may need. If cooker users report it
to be OK (as it started to be so), then it will be rebuilt for 9.0 and put
in unsupported/ mirrors.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Pascal Terjan wrote:
Trying to investigate my gnome-panel freeze, I attached gdb to the
process, but after loading symbols from libs it segfaults...
Loading from i686 libpthread. Pascal, you forgot to specify your laptop
system. ;-)
Anyway, should be fixed in -22mdk,
That was a bug indeed present in 3.2-1mdk. However, it now works with
3.2-4mdk and FSF GNU C++ version 3.2.2 20021211 (prerelease).
@resolution=fixed
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Götz Waschk wrote:
I had this problem with gstreamer-plugins, without an explicit
libtoolize call the C++ plugins wouldn't link to libstdc++.
Well, what we do in libtool is simply a workaround. You have to fix
gstream-plugins there too. ;-)
Basically, C++ code or
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Elliott Martin wrote:
The data files of the new package are in the wrong directory. All the files in
/usr/lib/FlightGear/data should be installed in /usr/lib/FlightGear instead.
Err, nope, I would prefer data in /usr/share/package/.
Hi,
Did the src.rpm and the rest of the train except for gcc-3.2.1-2mdk.i586
derail?
Mirror problem? They are all there. Warly?
Bye,
Gwenole.
Hi,
killed my system good when I finally upgraded, wouldn't boot. Anyone
else had
same probs?
Nope, works fine here on consistently updated systems. What did you do
(commands et al.)? When, from which system? On which hardware?
Bye,
Gwenole.
I can start with a brand new 9.0 install, urpmi glibc from cooker and
then
everything segs from that point on.
Hmm, you answered to half of the questions. My test machine was a 9.0 as
well. Then, I hand-installed glibc-2.3.1-1mdk at some point then urpmi
--auto-select everything from cooker.
Hi,
So /lib/i686 is missing in the patch chosen for P4.
After a symlink of i686 to mmx on the p4 box, it looks ok:
Could you please disable inclusion of icc7 setup scripts?
echo $LD_ASSUME_KERNEL?
LD_SHOW_AUXV=1 /bin/true ?
Bye,
Gwenole.
Le dimanche 22 décembre 2002, à 09:46 PM, Jerome Hugues a écrit :
got the same problem doin a urpmi --auto-select on my cooker box (on a
Pentium IV), here is a extract of traceback of urpmi doing the upgrade :
Thanks for the report. However, I can't see in the log initscripts
update. Do you
Hi,
Mmm, AT_PLATFORM is missing for the p4. How is it guessed/read ? mmx
present ?
AT_PLATFORM is passed through the auxv_t table given to the target
program from the kernel. Has this started to happen with glibc 2.3.1 or
can you verify this on older setup?
P4 /proc/cpuinfo (one of 4):
Le mardi 24 décembre 2002, à 12:10 AM, Olivier Thauvin a écrit :
When I try to recompil gnusound I get this message. Is somethings
(gnomelib,
gnomeui or glib) need to be rebuilt ?
Nope, fix gnusound sources.
cc lib/aclib.o lib/cpudetect.o rwlock.o mem.o pref.o marker.o modutils.o
module.o
Hi,
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/glibc-2.3.1/build-i686-linux/libc.so.6(*IND*+0x0):
multiple
definition of `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/glibc-2.3.1/build-i686-linux/libc.so.6(.bss+0xc0):
first
defined here
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/glibc-2.3.1/build-
Hi,
I'm seeing quite some packages not rebuilding due to this undefined
reference to `errno' error.
Then maintainers must fix those packages. People should stop thinking
that errno is a variable, which is not guaranteed to be so, which
actually is not with recent enough libc.
Bye,
Gwenole.
Use --with BOOTSTRAP for a first glibc 2.3 build with glibc 2.3
installed. And there is no support for Alpha.
@resolution=invalid
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, David Walser wrote:
- Really make it ExclusiveArch: i386 i486 i586
i686
athlon ppc
Arrgh! You forgot k6! Why does this need
ExclusiveArch anyway BTW? Not portable to
alpha/sparc?
Oh I see, you just used the macro.
Yeah, and I was just too lazy to
Hi,
- Patch51: Fix build with recent Mozilla LDAP API changes
Don't bother testing with LDAP stuff, it currently doesn't work.
- Patch404: Correctly load system libsane
Could someone please check #312?
Thanks,
Gwenole.
Hi,
An error occurred while copying the file arrowhd.soe to
/home/pasti/.openoffice/user/config
an error occurred while copying a file
ExitCode: 0
[...]
OK, I see now. Two solutions:
1) Provide common palette styles in main package but they won't be
localized.
2) Someone please provide
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
2) Someone please provide Finnish translation for palette styles. i.e.
That is used in OOo Draw for Fill color/pattern/etc.
Hmm, that appear to be already translated but I don't know where. i.e.
Sininen really mean Blue ?
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I think to kernel,
I think kernel enterprise is i686 already.
glibc (allready tunning by pluggin),
It's not plugin. That's multiple libraries automatically selected by the
dynamic loader.
database server,
?
gcc,
Useless.
mplayer...
That
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
As I am planing to buy Athlon 64 when they start to sell it I would like
to know if there will be a build (final) also available for Athlon 64
and Opteron CPUs.
Yes.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
Well I sure hope there will be a port to x86-64.
There is, and there will be a port to x86-64. Actually, the current focus
is i586, x86-64, ia64, ppc. Per current partnerships and business. People
should stop thinking MDK has to officially support ports
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Stephen Magill wrote:
I can't use control-key and alt-key combinations in Nedit in cooker. For
example, Ctrl-S (to save) just inserts dc3 in the document.
This is a known bug, please read the Nedit documentation/help information.
From the 'Problems/Bugs' section:
P:
Hi,
Anybody knows where to get (download, not order-by-mail) the spec for
ISO C99 ?
The ISO C Standard (ISO/IEC 9899:1999) is available for only 18 USD either
at ANSI or at TechStreet:
* TechStreet:
http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/basket?action=additem_id=2464099
* ANSI, somewhere in:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, pascal wrote:
I do not understand
where is the eventual bug, in qt 23, in gcc30 ?
Any similar experiences and misfortune with other distro and ( qt23 +
gcc30 )?
Not a bug gcc-296 and gcc-304 does not have the same ABI for C++
code That means that if you want to build a
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, pascal wrote:
I am not a programmer but a Merchant Navy Officer, by hoby a very small
tester, but sugest it should be great if somme of you could find some scripte
or others making transparent capability for compiling applications using QT
even with gcc 296 or gcc 30
On 7 Mar 2002, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Have given up trying to compile the cooker contrib src for open office
for the moment and now trying the binary from cooker contrib to get a
start. It wants a package called lpddaemon which I cannot find. Can
some kind sole give a hint as to where this
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Raul Dias wrote:
the linker will
match them together ? This sounds me a bug in the dynamic linker ?
Not in the linker itself, the reason was that the main package and the
library were compiled with different (and c++ ABI incompatible) GCCs.
1) Could you please name me
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Nora Etukudo wrote:
Unfortunately everthing in OpenOffice.org is now in english. :-(
Weird, please make sure:
1) You hadn't any ~/.openoffice already that was in English
2) You actually use German locales and LC_MESSAGES is set accordingly
(de_DE?). Check
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, H. Narfi Stefansson wrote:
[narfi@dhcp-104-6 narfi]$ rpm -q openoffice
openoffice-6.0.41-2mdk
[narfi@dhcp-104-6 narfi]$ rpm -q fonts-ttf-japanese
fonts-ttf-japanese-0.19990222-12mdk
Known bug fixed in -5mdk by simply omitting /usr/share/fonts/ttf/japanese/
from OOo font
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, David Walser wrote:
It crashes for me on even older:
kdebase-2.2.2-48mdk
kdelibs-2.2.2-32mdk
kdenetwork-2.2.2-2mdk
glibc-2.2.4-9.1mdk
And even even older:
kdebase-2.2.1-7mdk
kdelibs-2.2.1-5mdk
kdenetwork-2.2.1-2mdk
glibc-2.2.4-18mdk
KDE people workarounded the bug in
Hi,
Those being that either libstdc doesn't like compiling with the below
flags, or gcc is happy with them (2.9.6 from cooker):
i686 -03 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -malign-double -mcpu=pentiumpro
-march=pentiumpro -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions
-fno-strength-reduce
Huh, do you mean
Hi,
It's frustrating when the obvious blind sides you : p
Really s/kheaders/kheaders_ver : )
Huh, what do I do if this is already the case in -25mdk? You sure
haven't grabbed the 2.2.4-25mdk SRPM.
Bye,
Gwenole.
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Sergio Korlowsky wrote:
Same here... but!
If you run it in a console it works ok, funny I know that...
It only happens when running inside a graphical desktop such as KDE.
Are you talking about draksync or rsync here. I guess rsync.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Jason Straight wrote:
Don't know if this is some kind of fluke on my system, but I had to
install openoffice binary from openoffice.org due to openoffice
crashing when I tried to copy from calc.
Indeed, it crashes. On the other hand, the MDK rpm of OOo works when it
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Jason Straight wrote:
Don't know if this is some kind of fluke on my system, but I had to
install openoffice binary from openoffice.org due to openoffice
crashing when I tried to copy from calc.
Will be fixed in -6mdk as -fno-strict-aliasing did the trick. As such, I
On 13 Mar 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote:
$ cat 2free.c
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
void* foo = malloc(16);
free(foo);
free(foo);
printf(Program ran to completion.\n);
}
$ export
On 13 Mar 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
The fact that MALLOC_CHECK may no be honoured by gcc is a very
different thing in fact!
Huh, gcc itself doesn't care about MALLOC_CHECK.
1 - 100 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
