https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 19:20 ---
warly wrote:
Looks good, have not tested it a real setup yet, I am waiting for RC1 to
test winbind setup on.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-19 13:10 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pixel wrote:
(probably
And XFS.
And XFS on LVM over software RAID kicks butt! Redhat of course does not
have XFS or
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2356
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|73 |1353
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-26 15:49 ---
KDE bug entry:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52314
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2617
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|97 |1353
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2679
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|73 |1353
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2650
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2617
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-04 21:40 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you get a chance to test this again, please try with the new
samba3-3.0-0.alpha21.4mdk packages. If it does not work
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 21:02 ---
Still valid:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q libqt3-devel
libqt3-devel-3.1.1-13mdk
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 21:00 ---
Still valid in:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q kdebase kdelibs
kdebase-3.1-72mdk
kdelibs-3.1-52mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$
(newest available on my mirror)
This is quite irritating when trying to migrate users from windows ...
--- You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2660
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 16:53 ---
OK, that report of it working was from my cooker box which runs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q lisa
lisa-3.1-22mdk
My rc2 installation on my laptop:
[EMAIL
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
for though I don't know) of having a different
zeroconf name than the hostname (this is ridiculous really).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q drakxtools
drakxtools-9.1-11mdk
(Mandrake 9.1rc1).
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2553
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:32 ---
This may not be the same issue. Does your network card get an IP address (check
with /sbin/ifconfig)? Can it ping the gateway? What is in /etc/resolv.conf
(PLEASE
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2829
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:43 ---
Note that /etc/hosts should not need to contain more that:
127.0.0.1 localhost
(localhost.localdomain should never be set as a hostname).
tmdns should take care
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2796
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:44 ---
iDHCP doesn´t work for me. I access the internet through a hardware router.
I have to set my IP and the Gateway manually to get Internet Access./i
Please give more
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 21:53 ---
*** Bug 1431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2329
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2920
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 09:32 ---
You do not need to reinstall to get X back, try:
# service dm restart
But you may have two bugs here, firstly bug 427 (importing fonts from NTFS,
which has a fix in
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2935
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2883
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 09:33 ---
What filesystem (FAT32 or NTFS) are the fonts on that you are importing? If it
is NTFS, this could be a duplicate of bug 427
--- You are receiving this mail
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|drakfont
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 09:52 ---
I have found that using Helvetica looks substantially better than Luxi Sans, but
it would be better to have anti-aliasing working ...
--- You are receiving this
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2991
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2991
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 22:05 ---
*** Bug 2992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2992
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2796
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 00:04 ---
Guys, please give more detail here, if you want to see any more bugs fixed.
The issue 5mdk addresses is when you have a dhcp server that returns dns
servers, but does
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|dhcp address assigned even |zeroconf route added even
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 18:54 ---
I have tried the 6.1mdk testing RPMs (and set FONT_SCALING=AUTO in
~/.openoffice.conf), but they do not seem to make much difference. TTF fonts
used in the menus still
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3019
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 19:50 ---
Which kernel are you running?
There will be a mismatch if you run a cooker XFree86 and a non-current kernel.
Also, have you tried booting without framebuffer
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2741
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2741
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2741
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2829
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 16:30 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jsk_priv wrote:
environments
network
Your dhcp server was probably providing a domain name.
Switch Router
resolv.conf
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 23:28 ---
Code was taken out of the ifup script, see:
http://cvs.mandrakesoft.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/soft/initscripts/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup.diff?r1=1.41r2=1.42f=h
Lets
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-13 12:17 ---
Redhat is also affected by this problem (the one solved by removing
/var/lib/rpm/__db* and doing rpm --rebuilddb). I have had to help people on LUG
lists who were
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3255
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-13 14:40 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
steven wrote:
attempting
Browse to
address field.
This works for me, both in 9.1rc2 and more-or-less current cooker.
-
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3267
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-13 18:30 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
belle_eden wrote:
requests for new rpms,
MandrakeClub is one option.
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2796
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
://www.ghostscript.com/doc/cvs/Ps2pdf.htm
It seems -dPDFSETTINGS=/default is the same as just using ps2pdf without
options, and the -dPDFSETTINGS=/ebook seems not to work.
Here are some examples of the difference in file sizes created:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ du final_printed*
4.8Mfinal_printed
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3196
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 14:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=366)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=366action=view)
replacement for convertpstopdf.desktop, fixing the problem and adding a
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=121
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity||blocker
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.2.7a-3mdk |2.2.7a-6mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|tse3
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 17:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=367)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=367action=view)
Menu file to that makes the menu entry behave a bit better IMHO.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=792
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 18:44 ---
Have you ever tried stopping lisa??? Or have you tried 'service lisa status' to
check if it is running?
Actually, it would be good if we had a better default config,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 19:32 ---
Of course, one could query the scripts from the package *after* they have been
installed, and run them again? But the question is whether all %post scripts
would be
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
