-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
D'Oh, that one seems to be a new addition that wasn't in fact tested.
I've just tested on 8.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Watts wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
D'Oh, that one seems to be a new addition that wasn't in fact tested.
I've just tested
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:44:52 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once I have a clean 9.2 installation, or klama's got a 9.2 chroot, I
will build packages for 9.2.
But, then we need to have a policy for updates to contrib ... and
possibly one on per-release release suffixes or epochs
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 4:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
D'Oh, that one seems to be a new addition that wasn't in fact tested.
I've just
Commented out the gnome and id3 stuff, compiled fine.
But when I went to install the rpm we made and I get this:
Installation failed:
rpm-helper is needed by heartbeat-1.0.4-1mdk
Can I just nodeps this?
No, rpm-helper is a batch of script which install/configure services, users,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bret Baptist wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 4:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commented out the gnome and id3 stuff, compiled fine.
But when I went to install the rpm we made and I get this:
Installation failed:
rpm-helper is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
No, rpm-helper is a batch of script which install/configure services,
users,
group, ect...
Better, uses urpmi.
No rpm-helper on 8.2 (including MNF which I think Bret is using):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ cat
what does it tell you when you try and rebuild it?
, 18 2003, 19:43,Bret Baptist:
I noticed this on the linux-ha.org site, we are currently at 1.0.2:
6/25/2003: A potential remote exploit has been discovered in heartbeat.
Please upgrade to version 1.0.3 or later at your earliest
This is the result from rpm --rebuild heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk.src.rpm:
error: Bad package specification: %package -n %mklibname heartbeat 0
Bret.
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:18 pm, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
what does it tell you when you try and rebuild it?
, 18 2003, 19:43,Bret Baptist:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bret Baptist wrote:
This is the result from rpm --rebuild heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk.src.rpm:
error: Bad package specification: %package -n %mklibname heartbeat 0
Easy fix (I think)
Add something like this to the top of the spec file:
%{!?mklibname:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
This is the result from rpm --rebuild heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk.src.rpm:
error: Bad package specification: %package -n %mklibname heartbeat 0
Easy fix (I think)
Add something like this to the top of the spec file:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
This is the result from rpm --rebuild heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk.src.rpm:
error: Bad package specification: %package -n %mklibname heartbeat 0
Easy fix (I think)
Add something like this to the top of the spec file:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
This is the result from rpm --rebuild heartbeat-1.0.2-2mdk.src.rpm:
error: Bad package specification: %package -n %mklibname heartbeat 0
Easy
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:39 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
D'Oh, that one seems to be a new addition that wasn't in fact tested.
I've just tested on 8.2 in a chroot with:
%{!?lib: %global lib lib}
14 matches
Mail list logo
