Hi Valerie,
many thanks for the thorough review. I've taken all your feedback on
board with the latest push. Some of the test anomalies were a result of
previous iterations of test edits I had been making.
Regarding the extra edits in
"src/java.base/share/lib/security/default.policy", I had
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:08:03 GMT, Sean Coffey wrote:
>> Sufficient permissions missing if this code was ever to run with
>> SecurityManager.
>>
>> Cleanest approach appears to be use of InnocuousThread to create the
>> cleaner/poller threads.
>> Test case coverage extended to cover the
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 19:39:22 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Sean Coffey has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Move TokenPoller to Runnable
>
> src/jdk.crypto.cryptoki/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs11/SunPKCS11.java line
> 952:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:08:03 GMT, Sean Coffey wrote:
>> Sufficient permissions missing if this code was ever to run with
>> SecurityManager.
>>
>> Cleanest approach appears to be use of InnocuousThread to create the
>> cleaner/poller threads.
>> Test case coverage extended to cover the
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:08:03 GMT, Sean Coffey wrote:
>> Sufficient permissions missing if this code was ever to run with
>> SecurityManager.
>>
>> Cleanest approach appears to be use of InnocuousThread to create the
>> cleaner/poller threads.
>> Test case coverage extended to cover the
> Sufficient permissions missing if this code was ever to run with
> SecurityManager.
>
> Cleanest approach appears to be use of InnocuousThread to create the
> cleaner/poller threads.
> Test case coverage extended to cover the SecurityManager scenario.
>
> Reviewer request: @valeriepeng
