* Daniel Fuchs:
While playing with JDK 9 javadoc command I noticed that it
seems to treat all single method interfaces as if they were
functional interfaces - even though they don't have the
@FunctionalInterface annotation.
Does it take inheritence into account? If yes, why is this even a
It's a bug because it was an early decision in JDK 8 that got changed:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/2013-November/002379.html
And then the change:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-January/024165.html
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM,
* Paul Benedict:
It's a bug because it was an early decision in JDK 8 that got changed:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/2013-November/002379.html
And then the change:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-January/024165.html
So it's a
Bhavesh,
Can you take care of this ? Create a forward port bug to 9 and then do
the push for it.
Thanks,
Michel
Alan Bateman wrote:
On 17/03/2014 16:28, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi guys,
While playing with JDK 9 javadoc command I noticed that it
seems to treat all single method interfaces as
Hi guys,
While playing with JDK 9 javadoc command I noticed that it
seems to treat all single method interfaces as if they were
functional interfaces - even though they don't have the
@FunctionalInterface annotation.
For instance - I did 'make docs' - and I'm seeing this text
in the javadoc for
On 17/03/2014 16:28, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi guys,
While playing with JDK 9 javadoc command I noticed that it
seems to treat all single method interfaces as if they were
functional interfaces - even though they don't have the
@FunctionalInterface annotation.
For instance - I did 'make docs' -
Will forward port it. I will send an email once it is done.
Regards,
Bhavesh.
- Original Message -
From: michel.trud...@oracle.com
To: alan.bate...@oracle.com, bhavesh.x.pa...@oracle.com
Cc: daniel.fu...@oracle.com, core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 3:50:43 PM
