Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-23 Thread Bradford Wetmore
I would prefer that JCE1.2 be pulled out completely in the Cipher* classes. I will be sending you a separate note about JCE logistics. Thanks for doing this cleanup. Brad On 6/20/2014 11:46 AM, Henry Jen wrote: Hi, Please review a trivial webrev to add JDK version to @since in a format as

Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-23 Thread Henry Jen
OK, I'll remove all @since JCE line, as the class already has @since 1.4 as Joe pointed out earlier. Uodated webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8047721/2/webrev/ Cheers, Henry On 06/23/2014 10:04 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: I would prefer that JCE1.2 be pulled out

Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-23 Thread Joe Darcy
Looks good to me; thanks, -Joe On 06/23/2014 01:50 PM, Henry Jen wrote: OK, I'll remove all @since JCE line, as the class already has @since 1.4 as Joe pointed out earlier. Uodated webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8047721/2/webrev/ Cheers, Henry On 06/23/2014 10:04 AM,

Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-23 Thread Bradford Wetmore
JCE (Cipher) changes look good to me. Let me know if there's any problem with the point I mentioned in the other email. Brad On 6/23/2014 1:50 PM, Henry Jen wrote: OK, I'll remove all @since JCE line, as the class already has @since 1.4 as Joe pointed out earlier. Uodated webrev at

Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-23 Thread Paul Benedict
What's the rationale for removing the secondary version? Or I guess the question should really be: when are secondary versions useful? At least in the EE specs, the EE version plus the spec version are listed in many places like this. Cheers, Paul On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Henry Jen

Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-23 Thread Bradford Wetmore
Except for these two classes, none of the JCE APIs ever contained @since until the JCE was put into JDK 1.4 back in 2002. The unbundled JCE hasn't been shipped in probably almost a decade. None of the unbundled JSSE/JGSS should have them either. Carrying around this old information is just

RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-20 Thread Henry Jen
Hi, Please review a trivial webrev to add JDK version to @since in a format as Mark suggested[1]. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8047721/0/webrev/ [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-June/000806.html Appened is the diff as in the webrev. Cheers, Henry diff

RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-20 Thread Paul Benedict
Henry, I think JCE1.2 should get the space to be JCE 1.2 so it matches other secondary versions like JNDI 1.1 (last part of your patch). Or, you could make that another cleanup in itself. Cheers, Paul

Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-20 Thread Henry Jen
You are absolutely right, I should have fixed it as I did for the rest. Updated webrev can be found at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8047721/1/webrev/ Cheers, Henry On 06/20/2014 01:01 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: Henry, I think JCE1.2 should get the space to be JCE 1.2 so it

Re: RFR: 8047721: @since should have JDK version

2014-06-20 Thread Henry Jen
I assume the reason to have those @since JCE tag is somehow we want to distinguish those APIs from the rest, thus I chose to preserve them. If we agree it's not worth to keep, I can remove them. Cheers, Henry On 06/20/2014 01:25 PM, Joe Darcy wrote: Hi Henry, For the Cipher{Input,