On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:10:29 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Just FYI. There is a mistake in this changeset. The JDK ProblemList already
> contained:
>
> `java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LargeMapTest.java 8286980 windows-all`
>
> and this change then added:
>
>
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Tue, 24 May 2022 07:01:52 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Please approve, @AlanBateman, @mcimadamore and others?
Okay with me.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8843
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
> we can problemlist the failing tests to get cleaner runs for other patches.
> This
