On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:33:33 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > Is there any chance of backporting this to java 17 or 21? What's involved
> > in doing that?
>
> It's a straightforward process but I'm not sure I'm one to judge whether it
> would be appropriate.
>
> @jaikiran and/or @LanceAndersen -
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:43:40 GMT, Louis Bergelson wrote:
> Is there any chance of backporting this to java 17 or 21? What's involved in
> doing that?
It's a straightforward process but I'm not sure I'm one to judge whether it
would be appropriate.
@jaikiran and/or @LanceAndersen - any
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:53:55 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> `GZIPInputStream`, when looking for a concatenated stream, relies on what
>> the underlying `InputStream` says is how many bytes are `available()`. But
>> this is inappropriate because `InputStream.available()` is just an estimate
>>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:11:35 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> With inputs from Lance, I've updated the text and the summary of the release
> note as per the guidelines. You can now mark it as "Resolved", "Delivered".
Done - thanks!
-
PR Comment:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:49:15 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Archie Cobbs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional
>> commits
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:49:15 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Archie Cobbs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional
>> commits
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:53:55 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> `GZIPInputStream`, when looking for a concatenated stream, relies on what
>> the underlying `InputStream` says is how many bytes are `available()`. But
>> this is inappropriate because `InputStream.available()` is just an estimate
>>
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:53:55 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> `GZIPInputStream`, when looking for a concatenated stream, relies on what
>> the underlying `InputStream` says is how many bytes are `available()`. But
>> this is inappropriate because `InputStream.available()` is just an estimate
>>
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:53:55 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> `GZIPInputStream`, when looking for a concatenated stream, relies on what
>> the underlying `InputStream` says is how many bytes are `available()`. But
>> this is inappropriate because `InputStream.available()` is just an estimate
>>
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:53:55 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> `GZIPInputStream`, when looking for a concatenated stream, relies on what
>> the underlying `InputStream` says is how many bytes are `available()`. But
>> this is inappropriate because `InputStream.available()` is just an estimate
>>
> `GZIPInputStream`, when looking for a concatenated stream, relies on what the
> underlying `InputStream` says is how many bytes are `available()`. But this
> is inappropriate because `InputStream.available()` is just an estimate and is
> allowed (for example) to always return zero.
>
> The
11 matches
Mail list logo
