On 11/28/22 3:27 PM, Phil Race wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:57:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to generate a new
page listing the references to
Mike,
Thank you for the additional info.
In general, the intent of this patch is to leverage the existing links
in the doc comments, but given that there is now an intent to update
those links as well, I have incorporated the change into the latest update.
-- Jon
On 11/28/22 7:14 PM,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:04:36 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove updates from unexported files
>
> src/java.xml/share/classes/javax/xml/XMLConstants.java line 35:
>
>> 33: *
Hi -
I need to repeat again. Please avoid using www.ietf.org as the URL base
for referencing RFCs. The appropriate location is www.rfc-editor.org
and is going to be more stable in the long run than any reference to an
RFC that runs through the IETF's website. These two websites have
We hear you Mike :-)
I have logged https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297755 to update the
links in java.net / java.net.http API documentation.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 29/11/2022 03:14, Michael StJohns wrote:
Hi -
I need to repeat again. Please avoid using www.ietf.org as the URL base
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:57:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
>> comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to
>> generate a new page listing the references to all external specifications
>>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:57:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
>> comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to
>> generate a new page listing the references to all external specifications
>>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:57:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
>> comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to
>> generate a new page listing the references to all external specifications
>>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:57:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
>> comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to
>> generate a new page listing the references to all external specifications
>>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 19:20:53 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> The java.base/net/, java.http/, java.naming/ changes look reasonable to me -
> though like Alan I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have an inline `{@spec
> }` tag - similar to `{@systemProperty }`, rather than repeating all the
>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:57:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
>> comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to
>> generate a new page listing the references to all external specifications
>>
> Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
> comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to
> generate a new page listing the references to all external specifications
> listed in the `@spec` tags.
>
> "Somewhat automated" means that
12 matches
Mail list logo