On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:33:12 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> @vamsi-parasa You said:
>>> Made sure that OpenJDK builds without errors using both GCC 7.5 and GCC 6.4.
>>
>> but now we have https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321688. Did you
>> introduce any changes after you tested with
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:42:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Thank you Magnus!
>
> @vamsi-parasa You said:
>> Made sure that OpenJDK builds without errors using both GCC 7.5 and GCC 6.4.
>
> but now we have https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321688. Did you
> introduce any changes after
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:20:10 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> Okay, then I guess I am fine with this.
>
> Thank you Magnus!
@vamsi-parasa You said:
> Made sure that OpenJDK builds without errors using both GCC 7.5 and GCC 6.4.
but now we have https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321688. Did
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 22:37:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> I pushed closed changes.
Thanks Vladimir!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16534#issuecomment-1847939767
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 23:12:13 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 00:33:49 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
> > Testing have only one failure in closed tests and I need to fix it before
> > this can be pushed.
>
> Thanks Vladimir for the update. Is the test failure because of this PR?
Yes. One of our test, which checks integrity of built
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 23:12:13 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 00:31:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Testing have only one failure in closed tests and I need to fix it before
> this can be pushed.
Thanks Vladimir for the update. Is the test failure because of this PR?
-
PR Comment:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 23:09:01 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>>> LGTM, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks Jatin!
>
>> @vamsi-parasa, sorry, I was wrong. I missed that you need to check type
>> `bt`. Latest change is more complicated than it was before. Please revert it
>> back (undo last change). I will
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 23:09:01 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>>> LGTM, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks Jatin!
>
>> @vamsi-parasa, sorry, I was wrong. I missed that you need to check type
>> `bt`. Latest change is more complicated than it was before. Please revert it
>> back (undo last change). I will
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 23:12:13 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:44:24 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> LGTM, thanks!
>
>> LGTM, thanks!
>
> Thanks Jatin!
> @vamsi-parasa, sorry, I was wrong. I missed that you need to check type `bt`.
> Latest change is more complicated than it was before. Please revert it back
> (undo last
> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>
> For serial sort on random data, this PR shows upto ~7.5x
13 matches
Mail list logo
