On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:33:02 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hello Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>>
>> Will provide the performance data using AVX512 sort as baseline by early
>> next week.
>> (Friday is a holiday for us due to Veterans Day)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>
> Hello Vamsi
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 18:12:36 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> Hello @PaulSandoz and @AlanBateman !
>>
>> Did you have time to look at the latest benchmarking?
>
> Hello Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>
> Will provide the performance data using AVX512 sort as baseline by early next
> week.
>
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 18:12:36 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> Hello @PaulSandoz and @AlanBateman !
>>
>> Did you have time to look at the latest benchmarking?
>
> Hello Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>
> Will provide the performance data using AVX512 sort as baseline by early next
> week.
>
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:26:33 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>>> Hi Paul (@PaulSandoz), Alan (@AlanBateman), Any update? Do you agree with
>>> Radix sort in parallel case only?
>>
>> I think its definitely a better fit, but another aspect of my previous
>> comment was wondering if we need
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:26:33 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>>> Hi Paul (@PaulSandoz), Alan (@AlanBateman), Any update? Do you agree with
>>> Radix sort in parallel case only?
>>
>> I think its definitely a better fit, but another aspect of my previous
>> comment was wondering if we need
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:33:56 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> > Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review.
>>> > Can we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH
>>> > results look fine.
>>>
>>> As before, I think the main question with this change
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:33:56 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> > Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review.
>>> > Can we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH
>>> > results look fine.
>>>
>>> As before, I think the main question with this change
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:33:56 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> > Hi Paul (@PaulSandoz), Alan (@AlanBateman), Any update? Do you agree with
> > Radix sort in parallel case only?
>
> I think its definitely a better fit, but another aspect of my previous
> comment was wondering if we need a radix sort
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 23:40:25 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>> Just trying to understand: is there a reason to use
>>> `DualPivotQuicksort_RadixForParallel.java` and
>>> `DualPivotQuicksort_RadixForAll.java`?
>>>
>>> Would it not be sufficient to do the following
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:43:47 GMT, iaroslavski wrote:
>> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> updated comments (v23.08)
>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> Just trying to understand: is there a reason to use
>>
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:55:48 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> * improved mixed insertion sort (makes whole sorting faster)
>> * introduced Radix which sort shows several times boost of performance and
>> has linear complexity instead of n*ln(n)
>> * improved merging sort for almost sorted data
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:33:56 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> I think its definitely a better fit, but another aspect of my previous
> comment was wondering if we need a radix sort if the vectorized quicksort
> implementation is fast enough. IMO we need to compare performance results
> with the
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:17:17 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review. Can
>>> we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH results
>>> look fine.
>>
>> As before, I think the main question with this change is
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:17:17 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review. Can
>>> we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH results
>>> look fine.
>>
>> As before, I think the main question with this change is
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:17:17 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> > > Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review.
> > > Can we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH
> > > results look fine.
> >
> > As before, I think the main question with this change
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 06:12:57 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review. Can
> > we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH results
> > look fine.
>
> As before, I think the main question with this change is whether
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:55:48 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> * improved mixed insertion sort (makes whole sorting faster)
>> * introduced Radix which sort shows several times boost of performance and
>> has linear complexity instead of n*ln(n)
>> * improved merging sort for almost sorted data
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 06:12:57 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Hi team,
>> @AlanBateman, @rose00, @mbreinhold
>>
>> There are a big efforts now to improve sorting with x86_64 AVX512
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14227, no changes of
>> Dual-Pivot Quicksort logic.
>>
>> But at the same time
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:29:41 GMT, iaroslavski wrote:
> Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review. Can we
> go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH results look
> fine.
As before, I think the main question with this change is whether adding
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:55:48 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> * improved mixed insertion sort (makes whole sorting faster)
>> * introduced Radix which sort shows several times boost of performance and
>> has linear complexity instead of n*ln(n)
>> * improved merging sort for almost sorted data
> * improved mixed insertion sort (makes whole sorting faster)
> * introduced Radix which sort shows several times boost of performance and
> has linear complexity instead of n*ln(n)
> * improved merging sort for almost sorted data
> * optimized parallel sorting
> * improved step for pivot
21 matches
Mail list logo
