On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:40:58 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fixed bug number
>
>> > Please take note of the changes proposed in #11403.
>>
>> It might make sense to merge
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:40:58 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fixed bug number
>
>> > Please take note of the changes proposed in #11403.
>>
>> It might make sense to merge
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:20:44 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/io/SequenceInputStream/TransferTo.java line 206:
>>
>>> 204: }
>>> 205:
>>> 206: }
>>
>> As auto-detected, there is no newline at the end of this file. Otherwise it
>> appears all right.
>
> @mkarg Please take
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:20:44 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/io/SequenceInputStream/TransferTo.java line 206:
>>
>>> 204: }
>>> 205:
>>> 206: }
>>
>> As auto-detected, there is no newline at the end of this file. Otherwise it
>> appears all right.
>
> @mkarg Please take
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:42:44 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fixed bug number
>
> test/jdk/java/io/SequenceInputStream/TransferTo.java line 206:
>
>> 204: }
>> 205:
>>
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 09:41:47 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Since JDK 18 some implementations of InputStream.transferTo, namely
>> FileInputStream and ChannelInputStream, offload work to lower layers using
>> NIO channels. This provides shorter execution time and reduced resource
>> consumption.
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:40:58 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> > > Please take note of the changes proposed in #11403.
> >
> >
> > It might make sense to merge _this_ PR as-is _first_, but then add the
> > needed fix to #11403 afterwards?
>
> I concur. I will take a look at the test soon.
That
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 09:41:47 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Since JDK 18 some implementations of InputStream.transferTo, namely
>> FileInputStream and ChannelInputStream, offload work to lower layers using
>> NIO channels. This provides shorter execution time and reduced resource
>> consumption.
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:39:49 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please take note of the changes proposed in #11403.
It might make sense to merge *this* PR as-is *first*, but then add the needed
fix to #11403 afterwards? Otherwise it might be confusing for a reader, why
#11403 is not covering SIS
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 09:41:47 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Since JDK 18 some implementations of InputStream.transferTo, namely
>> FileInputStream and ChannelInputStream, offload work to lower layers using
>> NIO channels. This provides shorter execution time and reduced resource
>> consumption.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:22:16 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> Kindly requesting review. :-)
The override looks fine. I think [bplb](https://github.com/bplb) plans to
review/sponsor it.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11248
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 09:41:47 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Since JDK 18 some implementations of InputStream.transferTo, namely
>> FileInputStream and ChannelInputStream, offload work to lower layers using
>> NIO channels. This provides shorter execution time and reduced resource
>> consumption.
> Since JDK 18 some implementations of InputStream.transferTo, namely
> FileInputStream and ChannelInputStream, offload work to lower layers using
> NIO channels. This provides shorter execution time and reduced resource
> consumption. Unfortunately, this effect is prevented once the input
13 matches
Mail list logo
