On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:20:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
>> this into account for these jpackage tests.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:20:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
>> this into account for these jpackage tests.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:20:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
>> this into account for these jpackage tests.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:20:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
>> this into account for these jpackage tests.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:20:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
>> this into account for these jpackage tests.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:20:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
>> this into account for these jpackage tests.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
> this into account for these jpackage tests.
Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
remove added blank lines
-
Changes:
-
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:40:11 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
> this into account for these jpackage tests.
Thanks for the hint, adding the module info to TEST.properties works too.
-
PR Comment:
> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
> this into account for these jpackage tests.
Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
move module info to TEST.properties
-
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:53:08 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
>> this into account for these jpackage tests.
>
> test/jdk/tools/jpackage/junit/jdk.jpackage/jdk/jpackage/internal/AppImageFileTest.java
> line 26:
>
>> 24: /*
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:40:11 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
> this into account for these jpackage tests.
Instead of adding those directives to all 11 files, can you please try adding
`modules = ...` line to the
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:40:11 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
> this into account for these jpackage tests.
test/jdk/tools/jpackage/junit/jdk.jpackage/jdk/jpackage/internal/AppImageFileTest.java
line 26:
> 24: /*
> 25:
AIX currently does not have the jdk.jpackage system module. We have to take
this into account for these jpackage tests.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8316897
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15916/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk=15916=00
Issue:
13 matches
Mail list logo