Re: RFR: 8329420: Java 22 (and 23) launcher calls default constructor although main() is static [v2]

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:36:05 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote: >> Consider code like: >> >> public class MainClass { >> public MainClass() { >> System.out.println("Constructor called!"); >> } >> public static void main() { >> System.out.println("main called!"); >> } >> } >>

Re: RFR: 8329581: Java launcher no longer prints a stack trace

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:25:02 GMT, Sonia Zaldana Calles wrote: > Hi folks, > > This PR aims to fix > [JDK-8329581](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329581). > > I think the regression got introduced in > [JDK-8315458](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315458). > > In the issue

Re: RFR: 8329581: Java launcher no longer prints a stack trace

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:25:02 GMT, Sonia Zaldana Calles wrote: > Hi folks, > > This PR aims to fix > [JDK-8329581](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329581). > > I think the regression got introduced in > [JDK-8315458](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315458). > > In the issue

Re: RFR: 8329420: Java 22 (and 23) launcher calls default constructor although main() is static [v4]

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:20:24 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote: >> Consider code like: >> >> public class MainClass { >> public MainClass() { >> System.out.println("Constructor called!"); >> } >> public static void main() { >> System.out.println("main called!"); >> } >> } >>

Re: RFR: 8329581: Java launcher no longer prints a stack trace

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:25:02 GMT, Sonia Zaldana Calles wrote: > Hi folks, > > This PR aims to fix > [JDK-8329581](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329581). > > I think the regression got introduced in > [JDK-8315458](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315458). > > In the issue