[coreboot] QEMU x86_64 Q35 Automated Test Failure [master]

The QEMU x86_64 Q35 fails verification for branch master as of commit 6ee716e863117246d453e573d1a128da28b62cb7 The following tests failed: BOOT_FAILURE Commits since last successful test: 6ee716e drivers/intel/fsp2_0: Remove fsp_find_smbios_memory_info() from FSP2.0 driver 93fde11

[coreboot] Custom Layer or Overlay

Hi, At the Detroit conference someone mentioned that there can is a place to put proprietary code that is not for checking in to the public coreboot repo. I could not find this information on the coreboot website. Maybe I was looking in the wrong places or using the wrong keyword. Can some

Re: [coreboot] Intel soc ACPI generation using soc/intel/common/block/acpi

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > > > Le 8 févr. 2018 à 17:24, Aaron Durbin a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert > wrote: > > Hello all, > > First sorry

Re: [coreboot] Intel soc ACPI generation using soc/intel/common/block/acpi

> Le 8 févr. 2018 à 17:24, Aaron Durbin a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert > wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> First sorry for mailing direclty those of you who are on the coreboot >> mailing list. >> >> I’m

Re: [coreboot] Intel soc ACPI generation using soc/intel/common/block/acpi

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > Hello all, > > First sorry for mailing direclty those of you who are on the coreboot > mailing list. > > I’m currently in the process of upstreaming the changes we have on > denverton. > On the ACPI I see

[coreboot] Intel soc ACPI generation using soc/intel/common/block/acpi

Hello all, First sorry for mailing direclty those of you who are on the coreboot mailing list. I’m currently in the process of upstreaming the changes we have on denverton. On the ACPI I see a lot in common with the code available in soc/intel/common/block/acpi. However this depends on PMC