[coreboot] Re: System gcc requirements

Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: > > My argument is solely on complexity, but please don't trust that hash too > > much. > > If I shouldn't trust > "16 commit 4c523ed10f25de872ac0513ebd6ca53d3970b9de vboot" too much, > why should I trust > "04 tree

[coreboot] Re: System gcc requirements

On 18.11.20 23:53, Julius Werner wrote: > (Also, while we're on the subject of submodules causing pain, Nico... > whenever I want to build test older Intel generations I have to first > figure out again which of them don't rely on libgfxinit, or how to > hack around in their Kconfigs to disable

[coreboot] Re: System gcc requirements

Am Do., 19. Nov. 2020 um 01:26 Uhr schrieb Peter Stuge : > > the Git SHA of the submodule HEAD is stored in the main coreboot repo. > > My argument is solely on complexity, but please don't trust that hash too > much. > If I shouldn't trust "16 commit 4c523ed10f25de872ac0513ebd6ca53d3970b9de