[coreboot] Re: On handling vendorcode

> Any objections to moving the code out there that has no other upstream (e.g. > src/vendorcode/google/chromeos or src/vendorcode/eltan, I think?) while > moving in code from elsewhere in the tree that fits the "it has a foreign > upstream" description (e.g. the lzma library)? Sorry, I just

[coreboot] Re: problem after "convert to ASL 2.0"

Hi, could you test if this one resolves the problem, too, please? https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52144 Thanks! Michael ___ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org

[coreboot] Re: problem after "convert to ASL 2.0"

Yes,reverting comit 81d55cf solved the problem with current measurement on BAT state on lenovo T420. Angel, thanks!Also, thanks to all coreboot developers! 06.04.2021, 21:57, "Angel Pons" :Hi Andrew, listOn Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:52 PM Andrew A. I. wrote: Hello, Elyes! After

[coreboot] Re: On handling vendorcode

Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: > Any objections to moving the code out there that has no other upstream > (e.g. src/vendorcode/google/chromeos or src/vendorcode/eltan, I think?) > while moving in code from elsewhere in the tree that fits the "it has a > foreign upstream" description (e.g. the

[coreboot] Re: problem after "convert to ASL 2.0"

Hi Andrew, list On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:52 PM Andrew A. I. wrote: > > Hello, Elyes! > After "Convert to ASL 2.0 syntax" set of commits to current coreboot branch, > i lost the data of battery current on BAT state from: > cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/current_now > 0 > On AC state (charging)

[coreboot] problem after "convert to ASL 2.0"

Hello, Elyes!After "Convert to ASL 2.0 syntax" set of commits to current coreboot branch, i lost the data of battery current on BAT state from:cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/current_now  0On AC state (charging) data is present:cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/current_now 1346000Checkout to

[coreboot] On handling vendorcode

Hi everybody, We recently landed a change (https://review.coreboot.org/51827) to be more selective which parts of src/vendorcode are checked for coding style because some areas are really coreboot code "by vendors". The original purpose of that subhierarchy was to isolate code we draw in from

[coreboot] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 1 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s)

[coreboot] Re: CB:46587 - pirq_routing

Hi there Elyes, Your "getpir" idea really helped me to implement a set of CB:48427 "AMD good IRQ" patches. Thank you so much for your kind help! Wanted to thank you earlier but it got lost in drafts ;-) ___ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org