Hello!
Regarding the Intel ME, there's a good selection of articles on Hack A
Day. For starters:
https://hackaday.com/2017/12/11/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-intel-management-engine/
And then:
https://hackaday.com/tag/management-engine/
There you'll find five separate ones covering much of
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:17:13AM +0700, Hendra wrote:
> [..] so, in conclusion:
>
>- ME has its own MAC and IP address
No.
NICs have MACs.
NICs *may* have IP addresses.
>- ME can access the internet by using the OS's configured network
>connection,
Or perhaps a network
On 04.10.21 22:17, Hendra wrote:
> hi Nico,
>
> "they" refers to the adversary.
huh? that's the first time you bring that up, IIRC. Your original
question, how it is connected to the internet, does not imply any
malicious intention. If you assume that, all bets are off. I don't
think the quotes
Dear Ilker,
Am 04.10.21 um 22:28 schrieb Ilker C:
I have this computer since 11 years and working with triple boot from SSD
and HDD. Also I have PCI graphics card Radeon 512 KB. I overclocked the
CPU to 2Ghz to run Linux Mint and Win 10.
I had a problem with windows 10 due to the PCI
Hello All,
I have this computer since 11 years and working with triple boot from SSD
and HDD. Also I have PCI graphics card Radeon 512 KB. I overclocked the
CPU to 2Ghz to run Linux Mint and Win 10.
I had a problem with windows 10 due to the PCI graphics card conflicting
when installed ram is
hi all,
Thanks for the information.
hi Brian,
That's mind blowing, never think about that before.
hi Shawn / Peter,
Thanks for the pdf and link, I'm gonna find some time to read them.
hi Nico,
"they" refers to the adversary.
so, in conclusion:
- ME has its own MAC and IP address
-
Hi all,
Regarding Patrick's 2nd point (end-to-end testing), what's the recommend
way to go forward?
I just need to run one of the Coreboot's utils (in this case "elogtool"),
and make sure the output is the expected one.
Should I use Contest, as suggested by Ron Minnich?
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep
The X86_GOOD_APIC was set in the past in a few configs. You can find them via:
git log -S GOOD_APIC --source --all
The define itself was finally removed in:
commit fc57d6c4c2848726be1361f6dee3c33e7551b857
Author: Patrick Rudolph
Date: Tue Nov 12 16:30:14 2019 +0100
cpu/x86/lapic:
I would be happy if all those old buggy systems were gone, good idea Peter!
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:39 AM Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> ron minnich wrote:
> > The problem, at this point, is that a change this broad must also be
> > tested across all platforms to make sure it's not breaking.
>
> While
ron minnich wrote:
> The problem, at this point, is that a change this broad must also be
> tested across all platforms to make sure it's not breaking.
While true it could be worthwhile to check how often CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC
is unset...
> This looks like it was done for a hardware problem. We
The problem, at this point, is that a change this broad must also be
tested across all platforms to make sure it's not breaking.
This looks like it was done for a hardware problem. We had a lot of
x86 implementations in tree at that time, and they had lots of bugs.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:11 AM
On Mon, 2021-10-04 at 07:32 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> that was pre-git but is there any useful comment in git anyway? I only
> have the vaguest memory of why it went in.
It was introduced in c84c1906b7 and fcd5ace00b3 without explanation. I
particularly don't understand the lapic_write_around
> That raises questions including the following:
>
> - Does ME in fact extract network credentials from the main OS when
> latter is running? (IIRC, Snowden indicated the answer is yes - at
> least in some cases.)
Technically it wouldn't need to since it controls the networking
hardware
use linuxboot, don't use UEFI payload. That's what we've done at
Google, among other companies (ByteDance too).
if you use linuxboot, then you get our pxeboot written in Go, and that
can use http to pull the image down as well as tftp; http is literally
(measured) 100x faster.
I would avoid
that was pre-git but is there any useful comment in git anyway? I only
have the vaguest memory of why it went in.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:14 AM Julian Stecklina
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was looking at the Local APIC code in coreboot and was wondering about
> `lapic_write_atomic` in
Hello,
I was looking at the Local APIC code in coreboot and was wondering about
`lapic_write_atomic` in src/include/cpu/x86/lapic.h. This uses an atomic XCHG to
write to Local APIC registers. I would like to understand why this would be
necessary, because none of the OSes I've seen or worked on
Hi Coreboot Developers,
Very warm greetings!
Trying to enable PXE along with UEFI payload on Elkhart Lake CRB platform
Enabling Network stack requires below DXE drivers to be enabled
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/vUDK2018/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc
17 matches
Mail list logo
