[coreboot] Re: Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-24 Thread ron minnich
The word 'drop' has ominous connotations, but it's not a deletion. A board is never really gone. It's git. I can still find the Alpha boards in there if I go back far enough. It's just that active development ends, as no one is working to keep them up to date. Would it be ok with you to drop the

[coreboot] Re: Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-24 Thread Arthur Heymans
> With all due respect, dropping support for the majority of AMD boards > - with a quite significant community around them! - doesn't seem like > a wise decision, if we still care about the coreboot marketshare on > the worldwide-available consumer PCs. Small improvement in the common > source,

[coreboot] Re: Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-24 Thread Mike Banon
With all due respect, dropping support for the majority of AMD boards - with a quite significant community around them! - doesn't seem like a wise decision, if we still care about the coreboot marketshare on the worldwide-available consumer PCs. Small improvement in the common source, but a huge

[coreboot] Re: Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-24 Thread Martin Roth via coreboot
Hey Arthur, Nov 24, 2021, 05:50 by art...@aheymans.xyz: > Hi > I would like to suggest to deprecate some legacy codepaths inside the > coreboot tree and therefore make some newer ones mandatory. > ... snip ...> About the timeline of deprecations. Is deprecating non > conforming platforms from

[coreboot] Re: Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-24 Thread Arthur Heymans
> We could announce this deprecation in the 4.16 release notes, then deprecate after 4.18 (8.5 months from now). At that point, we'd create a branch and set up a verification builder so that any deprecated platforms could be continued in the 4.18 branch. That timeline of 8.5 months does sound

[coreboot] Re: Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-24 Thread ron minnich
I think, given how good a job you've all done with the release tags and so on, it's easy for people to get to a working build for a board; therefore, deprecating non conforming platforms make sense, as does your suggestion for six months. On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 4:51 AM Arthur Heymans wrote: >

[coreboot] Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-24 Thread Arthur Heymans
Hi I would like to suggest to deprecate some legacy codepaths inside the coreboot tree and therefore make some newer ones mandatory. The first one I'd like to deprecate is LEGACY_SMP_INIT. This also includes the codepath for SMM_ASEG. This code is used to start APs and do some feature