Hey Jack, no problem, let's start a new thread.
Apr 14, 2022, 14:56 by jrose...@chromium.org:
> Hoping I'm not derailing too far here: Could we consider modeling this based
> on > http://appdb.winehq.org> ? I.e., people can contribute test results per
> board, and upload things like "which
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 2:44 PM Martin Roth via coreboot <
coreboot@coreboot.org> wrote:
> Apr 14, 2022, 14:06 by 0xl...@gmail.com:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> >> I think we all agree that it'd be good to have test racks that have
> all of the boards in the coreboot repository for verification,
Apr 14, 2022, 14:06 by 0xl...@gmail.com:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> I think we all agree that it'd be good to have test racks that have all of
>> the boards in the coreboot repository for verification, however that's
>> currently not practical with the resources we have. The whole thing just
>> isn't
Karl,
On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 16:06 -0400, Karl Semich wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> > I think we all agree that it'd be good to have test racks that have all of
> > the boards in the coreboot repository for verification, however that's
> > currently not practical with the resources we have. The whole
Lee Leahy was my former office neighbor and has escaped the rain of Seattle by
retiring to Hawaii a few years back. I’m not sure if he’s still monitoring
this list.
I can provide some Galileo h/w for folks if there is interest in supporting.
Vincent
From: Karl Semich <0xl...@gmail.com>
Sent:
Ron wrote...
> do you have a way to recover if the flash fails?
Current programming hardware includes...
Dataman 40-Pro
Dediprog EM100
Dediprog SF100
Totalphase Aardvark
Several CH341A devices
Failing that, I have a soldering iron and hot air rework station!
Hopefully one of them will work!
Apr 14, 2022, 14:18 by 0xl...@gmail.com:
> I'm sending an email directly to the board committer since nobody has
> mentioned the history and is responding to my idea a lot.
> Lee, do you still have your quark galileo board? Are you at all able to test
> a new build or package equipment to
I'm sending an email directly to the board committer since nobody has
mentioned the history and is responding to my idea a lot.
Lee, do you still have your quark galileo board? Are you at all able to
test a new build or package equipment to mail to a volunteer?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022, 4:13 PM ron
do you have a way to recover if the flash fails?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 1:09 PM Andy Pont wrote:
>
> Karl wrote…
>
> >Obviously a way to sidestep all this would be to simply test the board
> >in question, which is a small investment of money and time.
> There is still one of these boards (Intel
Karl wrote…
>Obviously a way to sidestep all this would be to simply test the board
>in question, which is a small investment of money and time.
There is still one of these boards (Intel Galileo) available on eBay
here in the UK. I can likely commit the time to test coreboot on that
board but
Hi Martin,
> I think we all agree that it'd be good to have test racks that have all
> of the boards in the coreboot repository for verification, however that's
> currently not practical with the resources we have. The whole thing just
> isn't a simple problem to solve.
>
Often the biggest
Apr 12, 2022, 10:25 by insu...@riseup.net:
>
> On 4/12/22 10:17, Nico Huber wrote:
>
>> Hello Insurgo,
>>
>> On 12.04.22 16:01, Insurgo Technologies Libres / Open Technologies wrote:
>>
>>> On April 12, 2022 8:55:56 AM UTC, Arthur Heymans
>>> wrote:
>>>
> Would it make sense to backport
Apr 13, 2022, 06:10 by 0xl...@gmail.com:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 6:26 AM Patrick Georgi <> patr...@coreboot.org> > wrote:
>
>> Am 12.04.2022 um 23:54 schrieb Karl Semich:
>> > Obviously a way to sidestep all this would be to simply test the board
>> > in question, which is a small investment
Hi Julius,
> All payloads that use the CBFS API in libpayload should please upgrade
to the new API.
Thanks for the notification, BOOTBOOT has been modified to use the new CBFS API.
> If there are no objections I'd suggest that we target the official
deprecation and removal of the old API for
14 matches
Mail list logo
