[coreboot] switch or router hardware with coreboot

Hi, is there any currently commercially available switch or router hardware (10Gbit/s or more) running coreboot and preferably also Linux? I'm currently trying to build a PoC network where all components have mostly FOSS firmware and operating systems. My Wifi access points and 1 Gbit/s

[coreboot] id.coreboot.org Keycloak server problems

Hi, I just tried to log in to Gerrit with the link "Keycloak OAuth2 (gerrit-oauth-provider plugin) ", but the redirect to https://id.coreboot.org/... gets stuck during TLS negotiation.

[coreboot] FOSDEM 2023 stand for coreboot/flashrom

Hi everyone, I'm happy to tell you that we'll have a combined coreboot/flashrom stand at FOSDEM. When? Feb 4-5 2023 Where? ULB, Brussels, Belgium Exact location? Building Aw, Level 1, Université libre de Bruxelles, Campus du Solbosch, Avenue Franklin D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium

[coreboot] Re: What should we do about freenode IRC services?

Am 27.05.21 um 11:22 schrieb Urja Rannikko: >>> Currently, on libera there are 46 people and on OFTC 2 people (me included). >>> >>> So I would say let's move to libera. >> Agreed. Let’s do what most members in #coreboot users already did. > +1 > > I know I'm not a regular contributor or anything,

[coreboot] Re: Error 404 , can't open change 38107 on Gerrit

Hi Mike, maybe the archives contain some salvageable info: https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot-ger...@coreboot.org/ On 08.01.20 08:36, Mike Banon wrote: > Same problem with many other "Drop boards with ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK" > changes. So much work has been lost... > > On Wed, Jan 8,

[coreboot] Re: FOSDEM 2020 CfP

/002933.html FOSDEM 2010 Hardware Enablement Devroom https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/track/hardware_enablement/ Please submit a talk! Regards, Carl-Daniel On 29.09.19 00:45, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi, > > we want to participate again in FOSDEM 2020. Location: Brussels. Da

[coreboot] FOSDEM 2020 CfP

Hi, we want to participate again in FOSDEM 2020. Location: Brussels. Date: 1&2 February. Deadlines: Own developer room: Expired... Stand: 1 November Main track talk: first batch 11 October, second batch 8 November Lightning talk: 22 November Talk/Demo in foreign devroom: probably end of October

[coreboot] Re: April 10 and April 24 coreboot leadership meeting minutes

Hi, Am 26.04.19 um 23:01 schrieb Martin Roth: -- 24 April 2019 meeting minutes -- Attendees: StefanR, WernerZ, PatrickG, MartinR, MattD,

[coreboot] FOSDEM 2019: Success!

Hello everyone, a huge THANK YOU to everyone who helped at the coreboot/LinuxBoot/flashrom booth and/or gave talks or helped in other ways at FOSDEM. The booth was busy the whole time, the rooms with the talks were over capacity and each of you has helped spread the word about our projects. There

[coreboot] Fwd: FOSDEM stand info

Hi everyone, TL;DR: - Our stand is in building Aw https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/buildings/#aw - Stand buildup has to be finished Saturday 10:00 - Stand duty on Saturday ends 19:00 - Stand duty on Sunday starts 9:00 - Stand teardown starts at Sunday 17:00 - If you bring something, please tell

[coreboot] Re: [flashrom] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

On 01.02.2019 08:48, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > On 24.01.19 01:05, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> Hey everyone, >> >> just 9 days until FOSDEM in Brussels (2+3 February)! >> There are a couple of talks about coreboot and LinuxBoot and we have a >> coreboot/Linu

[coreboot] Re: [flashrom] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

coreboot/LinuxBoot/flashrom banner which helps others find our stand? Please forward this email to those who you think are coming and might be willing to help out. Thank you. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 30.11.2018 09:59, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi, > > * FOSDEM 2-3 February 2019 &g

[coreboot] Re: [flashrom] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

On 17.12.2018 15:28, Arthur Heymans wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger writes: >> * FOSDEM 2-3 February 2019 >> * We have a coreboot/LinuxBoot/flashrom stand! Need people for the stand >> (2 days, 1 table). > I Live in Antwerp, so reasonably close by, so I will certainly

[coreboot] Re: coreboot is under attack? many access problems recently, need to check that sources haven't been tampered

is much > easier to wget and browse with links text browser. Happy coming New > Year ! ;-) > > Best regards, > Ivan > > пн, 31 дек. 2018 г. в 19:40, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > : >> On 31.12.2018 12:34, Ivan Ivanov wrote: >>> Had a lot of access problems recen

Re: [coreboot] Rowhammer mitigation: RH activation probability

Actually, the latest Rowhammer attack is harder to exploit on laptops due to the power saving features for row activation. Servers use a different row activation strategy which has better performance, but also enables one-location hammering. See Gruss, Lipp, Schwarz, Genkin et al.: Another Flip in

Re: [coreboot] [flashrom] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

Kocialkowski wrote: > Le vendredi 02 novembre 2018 à 22:59 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger a > écrit : >> In that case, I'd also like to point you to the deadline for submitting >> main track talks which is tomorrow(!). >> https://fosdem.org/2019/news/2018-08-10-call-for-participati

Re: [coreboot] [LinuxBoot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

, David Hendricks wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:15 AM 'Ron Minnich' via linuxboot > mailto:linuxb...@googlegroups.com>> wrote: > > I"m leaning to yes, by which I mean if you do it, I'll show up. > > I can't believe I said that. > On Fri, Nov 2,

[coreboot] FOSDEM 2019 deadline today

Hi! FOSDEM next year will be on 2 & 3 February 2019. The deadline for applying for a stand is today. Do we want a coreboot/flashrom/LinuxBoot stand/booth? There will be a hardware enablement devroom as well, and we might be able to participate there, but that's not necessarily giving us a chance

Re: [coreboot] flashrom and 256 MiB S256FL256S

On 27.09.2018 22:34, Nico Huber wrote: > On 9/27/18 10:11 PM, ron minnich wrote: >> yeah, also is there a programmer you recommend for 32MiB parts? > Any programmer that can handle arbitrary SPI commands, e.g. single- > board computers with native SPI interface (RPi, BeagleBone Black etc.), >

Re: [coreboot] How is our SPI API supposed to work?

Sorry to interrupt, but it seems that there are conflicting definitions of full-duplex... On 19.04.2018 05:39, Aaron Durbin via coreboot wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Julius Werner wrote: >> I was trying to understand how to best implement the coreboot SPI API

Re: [coreboot] coreboot is going to make kcma-d8 obsolete

On 07.04.2018 14:37, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Yeah x86 is dead freedomwise but that doesn't mean boards that people > know are functional should be removed from coreboot just because. If people knew that those boards are functional, they would not get removed from git master. Sorry, lots of

Re: [coreboot] Upgrade the 12 years old LZMA libraries - should we do it?

Hi Ivan, On 03.04.2018 20:03, Ivan Ivanov wrote: > I have noticed that both coreboot and seabios are using the very old > versions of LZMA SDK. True. I introduced the lzma code in coreboot (back when it was called LinuxBIOS) when we were working on OLPC XO-1 support. > If we will upgrade our

Re: [coreboot] Real name policy

On 06.03.2018 09:13, awokd via coreboot wrote: > On Tue, March 6, 2018 1:58 am, Gregg Levine wrote: >> That's a great reason right there. Who knows how much they contributed >> to the state of the art, and did not properly sign it. But in the end while >> their world was collapsing around them, we

Re: [coreboot] Are multiple GPUs with lots of memory (ex: 8GB+8GB) supported in coreboot?

On 10.02.2018 19:57, Arthur Heymans wrote: > "taii...@gmx.com" writes: >> I would like to add this information to the wiki so I am wondering if >> anyone has successfully used for instance dual 8GB graphics cards with >> coreboot. >> > I don't think that this gpu memory is mapped

[coreboot] Server systems shipped with coreboot

Hi, does anyone have a list of server systems which are shipped with coreboot? I'm interested in coreboot+UEFI systems, coreboot+Linux systems, coreboot+SeaBIOS systems, pure coreboot systems. At 34C3 I was told by someone that a major vendor has been shipping servers with coreboot without

Re: [coreboot] New bugtracker/wiki registration process - please do not use freenode irc servers

On 31.10.2017 15:50, dz6g...@tuta.io wrote: > There was a talk about the registration process on the wiki and the > bugtracker. [...] > > The coreboot maintainer agreed that the recent registration process > should be changed. There was a talk about to use a irc bot + webchat > for that instead of

Re: [coreboot] Possibility to tear electrically out the Bios chip

Hello Vincenzo, On 13.10.2017 08:37, ingegneriafore...@alice.it wrote: > please, has some of you ripped out the BIOS chip from the motherboard when > the pc is power on ? > Has someone of you done this experiment ? > Could be damages to the motherboard ? Many times. It always worked if the

[coreboot] FOSDEM 2018, Feb. 3+4

Hello everyone, who's up for organizing a booth and maybe a devroom at FOSDEM 2018? https://fosdem.org/2018/news/2017-08-21-dates-fosdem-2018/ Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] coreboot at FrOSCon Germany? CFP ends tomorrow

Hi, the Call for Projects for the FrOSCon conference deadline is tomorrow. https://www.froscon.de/1/cfp/cfprojects/ Conference date: 19th and 20th August 2017 Location: University of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Sankt Augustin, Germany Did anybody already submit a proposal? If not, I'll

Re: [coreboot] The OpenSSD Project

Hi, On 05.04.2017 15:48, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > An alternative to blobbed drive firmware. > > http://www.openssd-project.org/wiki/The_OpenSSD_Project Yes, Cosmos and Jasmine are really nice research platforms. Jasmine is pretty old and you can't really use sizes above 30 GB or so. It has a

Re: [coreboot] How come the community meeting is hosted by proprietary software?

On 17.03.2017 15:50, Juliana Rodrigues wrote: > Don't know if anyone brought this up yet, but the FOSS communities > that I know uses jitsi: https://meet.jit.si Does it work better on low-end devices than it did a year ago? Back then WebRTC was pretty much unusable in the browsers I tried on a

[coreboot] European coreboot conference 2017

Hello everyone, we are currently planning to host a coreboot conference in Germany with 2 days of talks and an additional 2 days of hacking. The date will probably either be October 19-22 or October 26-29, i.e. directly before or after Embedded Linux Conference Europe and LinuxCon Europe.

Re: [coreboot] power controller/serial port mux

On 10.01.2017 22:56, ron minnich wrote: > I need an ethernet-attached device for controlling power to 4 to 8 systems With Schuko plug this ethernet controlled power strip is pretty nice (they also have a USB-controlled variant) http://energenie.com/item.aspx?id=7557=en > and also a serial port

Re: [coreboot] chat.coreboot.org is on

Hello Zoran, I think a forum is too time-consuming to be useful. A forum makes sense if you have volunteers with too much spare time like the various Linux distributions. A forum also means you need moderators to handle takedown requests, complaints from users and other stuff. If you take a look

Re: [coreboot] Welcome to the new coreboot.org!

On 08.09.2016 02:50, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > As some of you might already have noticed, our new web presence > has gone live on https://www.coreboot.org/ today! > > I want to use this chance to send a big shout out to Philipp Deppenwiese > and Martin Roth, and all the others that have been

[coreboot] FOSDEM 2017

Hi, FOSDEM 2017 deadlines are soon. Do we want to have a full developer room, a talk or just a stand? Unfortunately I won't be able to attend, so someone else will have to be the formal contact for organizing our stand/devroom/talk. I will help with submitting proposals if this is desired by

Re: [coreboot] How to protect binary in flash chip? OTP?

On 06.05.2016 09:49, Patrick Rudolph wrote: > On 2016-05-06 02:45 AM, Zheng Bao wrote: >> Is there any way to protect the binary image in flash chip from being >> copied? Once the customers >> gets the image, they can produce millions of board and do not tell me. >> I just want to know the >>

Re: [coreboot] Flash ROM locking on S3 resume

On 18.04.2016 19:02, David Hendricks wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Trammell Hudson wrote: > >> I'm curious why this is an option, especially since it seems almost tailor >> made to re-create the Snorlax or Prince Harming vulnerabilities >> (VU#577140): >> >> Flash

[coreboot] [RFC] board-status.git growth

Hi, since various automated systems started submitting board status files, the board-status repository has grown significantly to a point where submitting a new board from scratch requires a download which is bigger than the whole coreboot repository. Once I hook up four more systems in my lab, I

Re: [coreboot] commit messages and their suitability for coreboot.org

Hi, given that testing is something I value a lot, I'd like to chip in. On 23.12.2015 17:06, Aaron Durbin via coreboot wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Alex G. wrote: >> [...]For the >> sake of example, I will pick on a RABDOM commit message which follows >> the

[coreboot] Fwd: Your stand proposal for FOSDEM 2016 has been accepted

Hello everyone, let's make this our best FOSDEM stand presence ever! https://www.coreboot.org/FOSDEM_2016 Please fill in https://www.coreboot.org/Talk:FOSDEM_2016 if you're coming. Regards, Carl-Daniel Forwarded Message From: FOSDEM Stands Team To:

Re: [coreboot] Re : FOSDEM deadlines now!

y), but I'd > be happy to come by! > ----- Mail d'origine - > De: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> > À: coreboot <coreboot@coreboot.org>, flashrom <flash...@flashrom.org> > Envoyé: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 23:20:56 +0200 (CEST) > Objet: [coreboot]

Re: [coreboot] SPD binaries in coreboot

On 23.10.2015 21:15, Martin Roth wrote: > I like what I understand Nico's proposal to be: Store the SPD data as > a c struct with all of the different JEDEC fields broken out. it > would relatively trivial to compile this into an SPD binary, or it can > be used in whatever other fashion is

[coreboot] FOSDEM deadlines now!

Hi, we obviously want to participate in FOSDEM. https://fosdem.org/2016/news/2015-09-24-call-for-participation/ ACT NOW! Some deadlines already expired. Some can still be managed. Main track talks: Deadline 2015-10-30 (10 days left) One hour of entertainment, huge audience. Anyone up for the

Re: [coreboot] Emergency: Talks needed for coreboot conference in Bonn

r programming. >> >> And beside that, I would like to have a talk/workshop something, to >> think about the future/roadmap/vision/roadmap name how you like it. >> how coreboot should be in the next year. >> >> Best, >> lynxis >> >> On Fri,

[coreboot] Emergency: Talks needed for coreboot conference in Bonn

Hey everyone, due to various reasons, a few speakers can't make it to the conference and thus I have a severe lack of talks and the agenda is starting to look like swiss cheese (holes everywhere). Admittedly I do love swiss cheese (so many delicious kinds of cheese), but for a conference agenda

Re: [coreboot] Hotel rooms: coreboot conference 2015

My sincere apologies, the email address seems to be out of order. Please use wissenschaftszent...@wzbonn.de for booking a bed+breakfast room at the conference venue. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 10.09.2015 22:14, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > The venue still has 7 very affordable single/dou

[coreboot] Hotel rooms: coreboot conference 2015

sionals and hobbyists are invited. > > Please see the full text of the invitation at > http://coreboot.org/coreboot_conference_Bonn_2015 > > Sincerely, > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] From wildcat linking to exploring new languages

On 28.08.2015 18:29, ron minnich wrote: I would really like this to be in the tree. It gives us a chance to do things in coreboot that go beyond C and assembly. So that's my $.02. Same here. Besides that, SPARK gives us easier provability of code. That is something governments and safety

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH 0/4] Libflashrom

Hi Łukasz, yesterday I built this on a Ubuntu 14.04.3 (amd64) and tried to run it, but the tool segfaulted before even showing its own window. On the second try, it ran, but didn't handle a missing edid-decode well: sh: 1: edid-decode: not found Regards, Carl-Daniel On 14.08.2015 10:30, Łukasz

[coreboot] coreboot conference in Europe, October 2015

.2...@gmx.net or our mailing list coreboot@coreboot.org. Please enter your participation abilities in the doodle below: http://doodle.com/bw52xs4fc7pxte6d Regards, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] T60 with ATI has black screen

that, but I coudln't find it in my bash history. Apologies if all these instructions are in the Wiki and I have been too dumb to find them. Not sure if all of this is in the wiki. If you think anything is missing, please tell me so I can add it. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 27/06/15 23:19, Carl-Daniel

Re: [coreboot] flashrom claims T60 is unsupported

On 27.06.2015 15:20, Richard Simpson wrote: Hello, I have had partial success with flashing my T60. After the first flash the laptop re-booted OK, but the screen is completely black. Fiddling with the backlight buttons doesn't have any effect. Fortunately, I can connect via ssh so I am

Re: [coreboot] T60 with ATI has black screen

On 27.06.2015 23:39, Richard Simpson wrote: Hello, I have finally successfully flashed the BIOS on my T60 with coreboot. Sadly, my ATI controlled screen remains completely black. Fortunately I can still get in via ssh. Here is what I can deduce so far.+ AFAICS you have exactly the same T60

Re: [coreboot] Fwd: Coreboot T-shirts

Hi everyone, I found out that spreadshirt.de (biggest t-shirt printing shop in Germany) wants 21.99 EUR for a t-shirt (any size, any colour) including front and back printing (durable foil) of the coreboot logo. Shipping+handling to most locations in Europe is 3-4 EUR. @Vladimir: This might be

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot T-shirts

On 21.05.2015 12:51, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: A contact of mine proposes to print coreboot T-shirts for the community. Black printing on white T-shirt. Expected price is 30€-35€ + shipping from CH or DE, double-sided printing, one-sided is 5-8€ less. It will be printed in Russia.

Re: [coreboot] coreboot community chat

Hi Stefan, thanks for organizing this! I think it's a really good idea. On 07.05.2015 06:05, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Hi coreboot community! In order to have more face time and a more personal connection with each other than it is possible on the coreboot IRC channel, I would like to invite

Re: [coreboot] QEMU x86_64 Q35 Automated Test Failure

On 22.04.2015 06:01, Timothy Pearson wrote: On 04/21/2015 05:25 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Thank you for providing this service. It is very much appreciated. I would like to make a suggestion, though: The mail size of failure reports is increasing constantly as long as a boot problem

Re: [coreboot] QEMU x86_64 Q35 Automated Test Failure

On 21.04.2015 19:14, Timothy Pearson wrote: On 04/21/2015 11:44 AM, Timothy Pearson wrote: On 04/21/2015 11:31 AM, Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: 2015-04-21 17:31 GMT+02:00 Gregg Levinegregg.drw...@gmail.com: I suspect somehow it was supposed to be internal to hs outfit only. Timothy

Re: [coreboot] memtest86 reading 0k memory

On 08.04.2015 22:55, Stefan Tauner wrote: On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:43:44 -0500 Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:26:21PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Timothy Pearson tpear...@raptorengineeringinc.com [150205 19:23]: e820: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:

Re: [coreboot] coreboot paid development

Hello Milton, On 25.03.2015 00:28, Milton Krutt wrote: I ask the good people here if there is out there some form of paid development on coreboot such that a new contributor can apply to (apart from the GSoC). I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you looking for someone to pay you

Re: [coreboot] [flashrom] New flashrom logo - fonts

On 11.03.2015 14:30, Stefan Tauner wrote: This will be the last poll that evaluates specific features of the logo. There may be another one to determine the final design. I have selected a variety of fonts that I think are OK for a logo in terms of thickness and playfulness. Not all of them

Re: [coreboot] Plans for upcoming Broadwell Thinkpads

Hi, On 06.02.2015 21:43, Zaolin wrote: let's say goodbye to all Intel notebooks produced by OEM's which are not Google ( Chromebooks ). Maybe the haswell/broadwell notebooks of Lenovo without U/Y processor can be used ( Thinkpad tXX xXX ). It depends if they are supporting Intel Boot Guard on

Re: [coreboot] coreboot meeting this summer!

On 12.03.2015 19:55, ron minnich wrote: Given all the high-tech ability in this group, I wonder if a joint, transglobal, meeting using gvc from san jose to whereever would work :-) Now that sounds like a really neat plan. GVC is Google Video Conference? That said, I was silently working on

Re: [coreboot] [flashrom] New flashrom logo - please vote!

On 03.03.2015 00:50, Stefan Tauner wrote: On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:03:59 -0800 Vadim Bendebury vben...@chromium.org wrote: Not that I care much, but I can't help it: this new symbol looks very much like the infamous SS Bolts:

Re: [coreboot] Automated test system: Nominations wanted

This is a friendly reminder. 2 days left for nominations of systems. On 19.02.2015 00:14, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: The selection of target systems should include: 1. at least one x86 laptop without an active ME (present but inactive would be OK) 2. at least one x86 laptop which can boot

Re: [coreboot] [flashrom] New flashrom logo

Hi, On 22.02.2015 02:04, Stefan Tauner wrote: we have used two logos in the past for flashrom. The one most are familiar with is actually a generic icon stemming from coreboot's Related Tools section, i.e.: http://www.coreboot.org/images/a/ae/Chip_tools.png This is not only set up as the

[coreboot] Automated test system: Nominations wanted

Hi, I am currently planning to set up a test system with 5 (later up to 10) machines boot testing each new coreboot commit. This test system will be serviced (i.e. recovery from bricking) Mo-Fr during CET/CEST office hours. Current goals for every commit: - Check if coreboot + SeaBIOS are able

Re: [coreboot] On the subject of collaboration

On 14.02.2015 14:37, Peter Stuge wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: fork? a fork would be a good thing Hey look, I can quote without context, too! I hope this explains why quoting without context should not be done. Did you just hijack (or fork, as Alex likes to call it) the thread? No, I

Re: [coreboot] GSOC 2015 Preperations

On 14.02.2015 03:25, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: On Saturday, February 14, 2015 02:50:15 AM Alexander Couzens wrote: I would like to attend as a student this year. I'm open for most of the ideas at the page. Here are some of my ideas. - porting new mainboards (hp micro n54L and x121e atm) -

Re: [coreboot] On the subject of collaboration

On 14.02.2015 03:27, Peter Stuge wrote: Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se once said: Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: fork? a fork would be a good thing Hey look, I can quote without context, too! I hope this explains why quoting without context should not be done. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

On 16.01.2015 19:15, Marc Jones wrote: A coreboot code of conduct has been posted on the wiki. - http://www.coreboot.org/Code_of_Conduct I have written a blog post about why we have a code of conduct. - http://blogs.coreboot.org/blog/2015/01/16/coreboot-code-of-conduct/ Feel free to

[coreboot] GSoC 2015

Applications for organizations are open again. The deadline is very short this time: Only 10 days! http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] code of conduct (reloaded)

On 08.02.2015 19:07, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: I have until now ignored this code of conduct. There's been talk about how people feel unwelcome in _other_ projects, about how _other_ projects (fill in the blank). What there hasn't been any talk of, however, is any instance where this has

Re: [coreboot] Plans for upcoming Broadwell Thinkpads

On 07.02.2015 21:14, Timothy Pearson wrote: So the real question is: are there any AMD notebooks on the market with similar build quality to the old IBM Thinkpads? I've about had enough of Intel and their monopolistic ways. I saw AMD-based HP laptops (Probook/Elitebook) and they are nice (if

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

On 04.02.2015 12:31, Patrick Georgi wrote: Am 2015-02-03 11:38, schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: The current development guidelines didn't appear overnight, but were refined over time without a lockdown on the wiki. And yet they're mostly useless. The CoC wikipage is now unlocked. Let's see

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

On 02.02.2015 12:09, Patrick Georgi wrote: Am 2015-02-01 13:30, schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: It seems patches are being ignored or getting lost. It's not exactly news that people are busy. And patches on the list are ignored since 2011. Yes, but this is the first time a part

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

Stuge wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: this is the first time a part of the community has decided how other parts of the community should behave That's not really the case here. The code of conduct applies to everyone in the community, not just other parts of the community. Granted. Let me

Re: [coreboot] AMD Mahogany Fam10 not booting

On 02.02.2015 06:30, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: On 02/02/2015 05:40 AM, Scott Duplichan wrote: I found coreboot for AMD Mahogany Fam10 is no longer working. The problem starts with this change: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot-gerrit/2013-July/002391.html Some other older AMD boards are

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

Hi everyone, can we please put the Code of Conduct under some revision control? It seems patches are being ignored or getting lost. There are two possible solutions: Removing the lock on the wiki page or having the CoC in git/gerrit with automatic publishing. I'm fine with either solution.

Re: [coreboot] FOSDEM 2015

stuff. I will arrive by car. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 08.01.2015 10:48, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Hi everyone, please fill in https://www.coreboot.org/Talk:FOSDEM_2015 if you're coming. The same page for 2014 maight give you some ideas on what to bring with you. We have a booth/stand

Re: [coreboot] why is firmware 32 bit as opposed to 64 bit

Hi Scott, congratulations to this awesome feat! On 21.01.2015 06:08, Scott Duplichan wrote: ron minnich [mailto:rminn...@gmail.com] wrote: ]Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 06:34 PM ]To: Marc Jones ]Cc: Scott Duplichan; coreboot ]Subject: Re: [coreboot] why is firmware 32 bit as opposed to 64

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

Hi Patrick, I noticed that my comment on the wiki talk page for the CoC seemed to be unnoticed, that's why I'm continuing the discussion on the mailing list. On 19.01.2015 17:13, Patrick Georgi wrote: Am 2015-01-19 12:52, schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: Real citation needed, not just some

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

Hi Marc, On 19.01.2015 01:49, Marc Jones wrote: On Sat Jan 17 2015 at 8:12:20 PM Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Hi Marc, thanks for writing this up. On 16.01.2015 19:15, Marc Jones wrote: A coreboot code of conduct has been posted on the wiki. - http://www.coreboot.org/Code_of_Conduct

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

On 19.01.2015 17:13, Patrick Georgi wrote: Am 2015-01-19 12:52, schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: Real citation needed, not just some sentiment. For example, quite a few feminist blogs point to intimidating and derogatory speech/actions as the primary hurdles against female participation

Re: [coreboot] coreboot code of conduct

Hi Marc, thanks for writing this up. On 16.01.2015 19:15, Marc Jones wrote: A coreboot code of conduct has been posted on the wiki. - http://www.coreboot.org/Code_of_Conduct I have written a blog post about why we have a code of conduct. -

Re: [coreboot] FOSDEM 2015

Hi everyone, please fill in https://www.coreboot.org/Talk:FOSDEM_2015 if you're coming. The same page for 2014 maight give you some ideas on what to bring with you. We have a booth/stand with a single table. Regards, Carl-Daniel On 22.11.2014 01:43, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: 31 Jan 2015

Re: [coreboot] Success in booting the kernel in less that 1 second on the x60

Hi Charles, the main talk deadline and lightning talk deadline for FOSDEM are over, but maybe some of the developer rooms somewhat fit the topic and still accept the talk? Not sure. In any case, it would be great to have you there at FOSDEM at our booth if we get a booth this year. Regards,

Re: [coreboot] rfkill equivalent on the X60 - first partial success

On 07.12.2014 04:31, Charles Devereaux wrote: It can be powered, since in the X60 the WWAN port only has the USB lines wired, so it's not much of a security problem for the PCI bus as long as it is not connected to the USB bus where it could wake up from suspend and pretend to be many

[coreboot] FOSDEM 2015

Hi everyone! 31 Jan 2015 and 1 Feb 2015: https://fosdem.org/2015/news/2014-09-19-call-for-participation-part-two/ I would love to be there again and some of you already said they'd try to be there, but I forgot who. Who can be there with me at the booth and when can you be there? A preliminary

Re: [coreboot] sourcing 128MB flash chips for an X60 with coreboot

Hi, On 29.10.2014 05:17, Charles Devereaux via coreboot wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Kyösti Mälkki kyosti.mal...@gmail.com wrote: For the i82801gx part in x60, I am not sure if it will support 16MB SPI parts as datasheet specifies decode registers for the top 8MB only. Or was

Re: [coreboot] apologies in advance for a question I may have asked

Am 27.08.2014 22:07 schrieb ron minnich: well, stefan, I was hoping not to hear that answer, but I guess that's the way it goes :-) Well, 16 MByte are doable and also happen on real hardware, but with bigger chips you're out of luck. Both for SPI addressing reasons (24 bit addresses by default)

Re: [coreboot] New board with unsupported cpu, chipset, and superIO

Am 28.08.2014 23:16 schrieb Todd Weaver: On Aug 28, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Todd Weaver t...@m2n.com wrote: On Aug 28, 2014, at 10:59 AM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote: The truth here is that we NEED to have a blob-free version (libreboot), so I have a lot of work ahead of me :) If you

Re: [coreboot] disabling bios usb stack

Hi Ron, Am 26.08.2014 00:22 schrieb ron minnich: disabling the usb stack is the goal in this case. AFAIK it's called USB keyboard support, USB legacy support or something similar in most BIOSes. This internally maps a USB keyboard to a virtual PS/2 keyboard and sometimes has quite a few issues.

Re: [coreboot] AMD PSP

Am 26.08.2014 20:00 schrieb Bruce Griffith: Here's what I know about PSP: I'm utterly ignorant of the PSP -- is this thing like the Intel ME, and how scared should we be of it? Somewhat scared. The PSP is an actual processor that takes control when reset is released. The x86 does not start

Re: [coreboot] earliest running code with qemu

Am 13.08.2014 07:05 schrieb ron minnich: I'm sure it could run were someone to implement it. A few years ago, I implemented partial MTRR support in Qemu. To be exact, I added support for not throwing away the MTRR contents after a write and now you can actually read the MTRRs after writing. That

Re: [coreboot] Any plans to fix payload builds on 64-bit machines?

Am 21.05.2014 22:13 schrieb Patrick Georgi: Am 21.05.2014 03:31, schrieb Sean McNeil: All the recent changes to how the compiler is defined have now caused payloads like FILO and SeaBIOS to not build on X86_64 machines. Is anyone working to fix this? --- a/src/arch/x86/Makefile.inc +++

[coreboot] AMD A76M chipset?

Hi, HP and other laptop vendors claim to use an AMD A76M chipset in some of their machines. I have been unable to find any info about (or even confirm the existence of) the A76M on the AMD website or any other reliable source. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_chipsets is also

Re: [coreboot] Thinkpad X61

Hi mad, someone who has experience porting chipsets could add support for the i965 chipset with maybe 6-12 months of fulltime work. This is of course under the (unlikely) assumption that full documentation is available. If you're doing it as a hobby and have to learn firmware development first, I

Re: [coreboot] P965/ICH8 support revisited

Hi Yuval, someone who has experience porting chipsets could add support for this i965 chipset with maybe 6-12 months of fulltime work. This is of course under the (unlikely) assumption that full documentation is available. If you're doing it as a hobby and have to learn firmware development

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >