thanks Paul, I had not realized I'd not yet loaded uuid-dev on the new
machine.
That said, I have seen, more recently, some libraries that don't come with
a .a any more. But, clearly, that test for libuuid was broken it seems.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 1:23 AM Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Ron,
>
>
>
Dear Ron,
Am 08.01.23 um 20:16 schrieb ron minnich:
But in some cases static libs are no longer provided at all. Would be nice
to know if that's the case for libuuid.
The static library is part of `uuid-dev` [1]:
/usr/include/uuid/uuid.h
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.a
What does it to to see if library is present? Strace may help.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023, 12:48 PM Rafael Send
wrote:
> Hi,
> The weird part is that if I build from the root directory, it DOES say
> uuid-dev is found yet the build still fails. Might that be for the
> aforementioned reason* " Many
Solved it - apparently I had to install python3-distutils after chewing
through the error log above. It's kinda weird that it was also complaining
about other things in the meantime - but...
thanks for the suggestion about moving the xgcc folder though, that really
got me unstuck here.
Cheers,
Hi,
The weird part is that if I build from the root directory, it DOES say
uuid-dev is found yet the build still fails. Might that be for the
aforementioned reason* " Many tests will indicate that a library is present
if they find the .so. But the .so is useless if you need static linking."*
?
If it would help, we could supply a VM with each release that had the coreboot
toolchain pre-built. It's also possible to use the released docker images to
rebuild coreboot - those already contain the toolchain.
The advantages to both of these is that you'd be building in the environment
that
But in some cases static libs are no longer provided at all. Would be nice
to know if that's the case for libuuid.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023, 9:24 AM Nico Huber wrote:
> On 08.01.23 17:42, ron minnich wrote:
> > For reasons I still don't understand, the various linux distros no longer
> > ship .a as
On 08.01.23 17:42, ron minnich wrote:
> For reasons I still don't understand, the various linux distros no longer
> ship .a as part of the library package.
They ship them separately. On Ubuntu, usually a -dev package. I even
recall -devel-static packages (-devel was headers only and such)
~20
If i look on ubuntu 18 I see this: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.a
If I look on ubuntu 22, it's no longer there.
to build firmware with this sort of library, you need the .a (which is for
static linking). Somewhat ironic, for UEFI, since the entire DXE model is
built on the DLL model, that
Actually, that's not quite right. When I "make" from the root directory, it
appears not to fully build Tianocore and throws an error saying
"UEFIPAYLOAD.fd - no such file or directory". If I enter
payloads/externa/tianocore directory and attempt to "make" there as I've
done before (I think), I
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion. It built in master, then I copied it to the xgcc
folder from the fork I'm using. Close, but no dice just yet. I'm now
running into a different problem, both on master and on my fork:
Tianocore says it lacks uuid-dev (libuuid-devel). I'm on Ubuntu, and
uuid-dev is
On 07.01.23 23:53, Rafael Send wrote:
> If I wanted to try your first suggestion, does the toolchain build
> transcend directories? In order to not mix up trees & versions so far I
> have just checked out the latest master and the version in question into
> two totally separate coreboot folders.
Hi,
If I wanted to try your first suggestion, does the toolchain build
transcend directories? In order to not mix up trees & versions so far I
have just checked out the latest master and the version in question into
two totally separate coreboot folders.
Thanks,
R
Am Sa., 7. Jan. 2023 um 14:32
Hi Rafael,
On 07.01.23 22:03, Rafael Send wrote:
> I didn't downgrade the toolchain intentionally, I'm looking to build a fork
> of coreboot for a specific platform (mjg59's X2100 port) that never got
> upstreamed. After pulling his repo at
> https://github.com/mjg59/coreboot/tree/x2100_ng, that
Hi,
I didn't downgrade the toolchain intentionally, I'm looking to build a fork
of coreboot for a specific platform (mjg59's X2100 port) that never got
upstreamed. After pulling his repo at
https://github.com/mjg59/coreboot/tree/x2100_ng, that is what it wants to
build with.
I haven't build any
Hi there Rafael,
Please tell me, what is a platform for which you are going to build a
coreboot? Seeing that you have downgraded your toolchain's GCC version
to 8.3.0, like I'm suggesting in this manual -
http://dangerousprototypes.com/docs/Lenovo_G505S_hacking - I suspect
that your platform is
16 matches
Mail list logo
