Re: [coreboot] Why does src/soc/intel/ exist?

2017-05-02 Thread Marc Jones
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:30 AM Arthur Heymans wrote: > Ok thanks for clarifying. > > Aaron Durbin writes: > > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Arthur Heymans > wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I am wondering why newer intel code is being

Re: [coreboot] Why does src/soc/intel/ exist?

2017-05-02 Thread Arthur Heymans
Ok thanks for clarifying. Aaron Durbin writes: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Arthur Heymans wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am wondering why newer intel code is being pushed to src/soc/intel/*/ >> instead of the traditional

Re: [coreboot] Why does src/soc/intel/ exist?

2017-05-02 Thread Aaron Durbin via coreboot
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Arthur Heymans wrote: > Hi > > I am wondering why newer intel code is being pushed to src/soc/intel/*/ > instead of the traditional src/{cpu,southbridge,northbridge}/intel ? The era of mix and match ICs is pretty much gone. Even when there are

[coreboot] Why does src/soc/intel/ exist?

2017-05-02 Thread Arthur Heymans
Hi I am wondering why newer intel code is being pushed to src/soc/intel/*/ instead of the traditional src/{cpu,southbridge,northbridge}/intel ? I know that physically things are now on one chip hence the soc but the code itself is often very similar to older cpu/southbridge/northbridge code. A