Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-17 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Paul Menzel [171006 09:43]: > Dear Martin, > > > Am Dienstag, den 03.10.2017, 08:07 -0600 schrieb Martin Roth: > > I'd say that it doesn't make sense to require that coreboot builds > > with anything other than the coreboot toolchain. > > Additionally, It

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Patrick, Am Freitag, den 06.10.2017, 15:03 +0200 schrieb Patrick Georgi: > 2017-10-06 9:43 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel: > > Having the code base compatible with future toolchains is quite > > important and convenient in my opinion. > > That's a great argument to switch out the toolchain 4 months

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-06 Thread Patrick Georgi via coreboot
2017-10-06 9:43 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel : > Having the code base compatible with future toolchains is quite > important and convenient in my opinion. That's a great argument to switch out the toolchain 4 months before a release. Which means 3.5 months ago. >

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-06 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Martin, Am Dienstag, den 03.10.2017, 08:07 -0600 schrieb Martin Roth: > I'd say that it doesn't make sense to require that coreboot builds > with anything other than the coreboot toolchain. > Additionally, It isn't reasonable to introduce a new requirement this > close to the release.

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-03 Thread Martin Roth
I'd say that it doesn't make sense to require that coreboot builds with anything other than the coreboot toolchain. Additionally, It isn't reasonable to introduce a new requirement this close to the release. Martin On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Paul Menzel

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-03 Thread Williams, Hannah
;coreboot@coreboot.org>; Williams, Hannah <hannah.willi...@intel.com> Subject: Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7 hi Paul, I took a look at this, and the error appears to be the result of a change in IASL 20170531: "Improved the behavi

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-02 Thread Iru Cai
Hi all, I found that ACPICA released version 20170929 yesterday, and it's more strict than previous versions. I can't even use it to build qemu-i440fx because many dsdt files have methods that are not used, which will make iasl warn about this. Iru On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Matt

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-02 Thread Matt DeVillier
hi Paul, I took a look at this, and the error appears to be the result of a change in IASL 20170531: "Improved the behavior of the iASL compiler and disassembler to detect improper use of external declarations" According to the ACPI 6.2 spec, "The External directive informs the ASL compiler

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-10-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear coreboot folks, Am Mittwoch, den 20.09.2017, 08:17 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: > I’d like to propose the following goal for the upcoming coreboot 4.7 > release. > > All boards have to build with GCC 7.2 [1] and IASL 20170831 [2]. > > For the latter, several Intel boards fail to build [3].

[coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

2017-09-20 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear coreboot folks, I’d like to propose the following goal for the upcoming coreboot 4.7 release. All boards have to build with GCC 7.2 [1] and IASL 20170831 [2]. For the latter, several Intel boards fail to build [3]. It’d be great if the maintainers looked into it. Thanks, Paul [1]