Am Fr., 6. Apr. 2018 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb Piotr Król :
> Can you tell what is this "one system"?
>
Sorry, "any one system" - just the system that the developer who last
touched the payload integration happened to test with.
As said, there's little rigor around the payload
On 04/06/2018 12:20 PM, Patrick Georgi wrote:
> Am Mi., 4. Apr. 2018 um 18:10 Uhr schrieb Aaron Durbin via coreboot
> >:
>
> > Agree, but coreboot use old commit from edk2. Is it fine to push
> vUDK2018?
>
> I guess? I'm not
Am Mi., 4. Apr. 2018 um 18:10 Uhr schrieb Aaron Durbin via coreboot <
coreboot@coreboot.org>:
> > Agree, but coreboot use old commit from edk2. Is it fine to push
> vUDK2018?
>
> I guess? I'm not really sure who uses edk2. I guess tianocore payload?
> Patrick is on holiday right now, but he would
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Piotr Król wrote:
>
>
> On 04/04/2018 05:31 PM, Aaron Durbin wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Piotr Król wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I can't compile tianocore payload using coreboot-sdk:1.50 and coreboot 4.7.
>>>
>>>
On 04/04/2018 05:31 PM, Aaron Durbin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Piotr Król wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I can't compile tianocore payload using coreboot-sdk:1.50 and coreboot 4.7.
>>
>> VfrUtilityLib.cpp: In member function 'CHAR8*
>>
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Piotr Król wrote:
> Hi all,
> I can't compile tianocore payload using coreboot-sdk:1.50 and coreboot 4.7.
>
> VfrUtilityLib.cpp: In member function 'CHAR8*
> CVfrStringDB::GetVarStoreNameFormStringId(EFI_STRING_ID)':
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo