Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-08 Thread Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
Hi Adriano, My apologies! It was in the past discussed about limiting timestamping to 72 or 75 months alltogether, then not requiring the SubCAs to be offline. The compromise here still allows up to 135 month timestamp certificates, if the SubCAs are offline. Mind you there’s no current

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-08 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
Hi, wouldn't it have been a little kinder to wait for an answer to the question I asked on Friday 5? It may be that the answer was obvious, but it remains unclear to me where that 72 months comes from. Adriano Il 08/04/2024 09:31, Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public ha scritto: