Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-22 Thread Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
stophe Bonjean Subject: Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the c

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-16 Thread Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
toni via Cscwg-public Date: Tuesday, 16 April 2024 at 08:35 To: cscwg-public@cabforum.org Subject: Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click link

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-16 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
I concur with Christophe. Adriano Il 12/04/2024 16:30, Christophe Bonjean via Cscwg-public ha scritto: Hi Martijn, Looking at the purpose of the ballot, the goal is to require *newly issued* [..] *Private Keys *to be stored in offline HSMs*.* ** The proposed change scopes this change to

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-08 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
Hi Martijn, I can't find (in the call minutes) a past discussion about that, however I assume it's fine for everyone since I haven't seen any objections. Adriano Il 08/04/2024 10:08, Martijn Katerbarg ha scritto: Hi Adriano, My apologies! It was in the past discussed about limiting