To: Martijn Katerbarg ; Dean Coclin
; Tim Hollebeek ;
cscwg-public@cabforum.org; Bruce Morton
Subject: Re: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and Timestamp
Changes
Makes sense. The CWG has the first say in its own Charter.
Thanks,
Dimitris.
On 13/9/2023 12:11 μ.μ., Martijn
10:14
*To: *Tim Hollebeek ,
cscwg-public@cabforum.org , Martijn
Katerbarg , Bruce Morton
*Subject: *RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and
Timestamp Changes
What “current timestamping BRs” are you referring to?
As I said, timestamping strictly related to code signing
, 2023 8:27 PM
To: Dean Coclin ; cscwg-public@cabforum.org; Martijn
Katerbarg ; Bruce Morton
Subject: RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and Timestamp
Changes
This is just wrong, and Martijn was trying to say the opposite thing anyway: we
should update the c
M
To: Dean Coclin ; cscwg-public@cabforum.org;
Martijn Katerbarg ; Bruce Morton
Subject: RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and
Timestamp Changes
This is just wrong, and Martijn was trying to say the opposite thing anyway:
we should update the charter to explic
@cabforum.org; Bruce Morton
Subject: Re: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and
Timestamp Changes
As has been pointed out many times, the charter of the CSCWG does not
include timestamping. Hence anything related to that beyond Code Signing
would require a change to the charter
;
cscwg-public@cabforum.org; Bruce Morton
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk
and Timestamp Changes
As has been pointed out many times, the charter of the CSCWG does not
include timestamping. Hence anything related to that beyond Code Signing
would require
From: Cscwg-public On Behalf Of Martijn
Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 11:47 AM
To: Bruce Morton ; cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and
Timestamp Changes
Hey Bruce,
I'm inclined to say that even
rg <mailto:cscwg-public@cabforum.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk
and Timestamp Changes
As discussed on the last call, Ive moved the language into GitHub, which
can be reviewed at
https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/main...XolphinMartijn
certificates but that still are a TSA.
Regards,
Martijn
From: Bruce Morton
Date: Thursday, 31 August 2023 at 17:30
To: Martijn Katerbarg ,
cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and Timestamp
Changes
Hi Martijn,
Thanks for the Github version!
We
be used for 15-months which is not changing.
Bruce.
From: Martijn Katerbarg
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 10:56 AM
To: Bruce Morton ; cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and
Timestamp Changes
As discussed on the last
to maybe give
additional time for existing setups?
Thoughts?
Regards,
Martijn
From: Bruce Morton
Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2023 20:00
To: Martijn Katerbarg ; cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and Timestamp
Changes
Agreed
Agreed with the change proposal.
Thanks, Bruce.
From: Martijn Katerbarg
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 3:54 PM
To: Bruce Morton ; cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and
Timestamp Changes
Thanks Bruce,
I’m going
To: cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: [Cscwg-public] Proposed Signing Service, High Risk and Timestamp
Changes
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Based
13 matches
Mail list logo
