-Caveat Lector-
an excerpt from:
Scarlet and the Beast - A History of the War Between English and French
Freemasonry
John Daniel (C)1994
John Kregel, Inc.
P. O. box 131480
Tyler, Texas 75713
ISBN 0-9635079-0-7
-----
can be purchased from:
Global insights
675 Fairview Dr. #246
Carson City, NV 89701
702-885-0700
800-729-4131(orders only)
--[7b]--
The Protocols, Jack the Ripper and Gentile "Non-Masons"
Gentile Freemasonry refers to its initiates as Jews, refers to its lodges as
Solomon's Temple, and calls non-Masons Gentiles. Likewise, a republic founded
by Freemasonry and governed by Masons is by inference a Jewish nation.
Conversely, a kingdom not ruled by Freemasonry, such as Russia, would be
considered a Gentile nation. Christian Russia, then, would certainly be
called a "Gentile government" by "them that say they are Jews, and are not,
but do Stephen Knight documents the Masonic use of the word "Gentile" in The
Brotherhood When a meeting is called at the Masonic Temple, he says Masons
converge on the lodge from all directions. "Once inside the Hail, each turned
his steps towards the Crypt, which was cordoned off so that no intruder could
make his way down the stair and report the goings-on to any 'Gentile'.(71)
Knight connects the Protocols to Gentile Freemasonry by examining a seemingly
unrelated subject: the notorious murders of Jack the Ripper, committed in
1888 between August and November. 'The Jack the Ripper murders in the East
End of London in 1888," asserts Knight, "were perpetrated according to
masonic [sic] ritual and a subsequent police cover-up was led by the
Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, both
Freemasons."(72)
To comprehend what is meant by "murders...according to Masonic ritual," we
must understand the Masonic ceremony of the 3rd degree -- the Master Mason
degree. Stephen Knight explains the Masonic ritual focus on murder:
Much of Masonic ritual centres on murder. At the 3rd degree, the victim is
Hiram Abiff, mythical architect in charge of the building of Solomon's
temple. The ceremony involves the mimed murder of Hiram by three Apprentice
Masons, and his subsequent resurrection. The three Apprentices are named
Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum -- known collectively as the Juwes [Masonic
spelling for Jews]. In masonic [sic] lore, the Juwes are hunted down and
executed, "by the breast being torn open and the heart and vitals taken out
and thrown over the left shoulder," which closely parallels the details of
Jack the Ripper's modus operardi.(73)
In 1888, Sir Charles Warren was Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police and
one of the country's most eminent Freemasons. Two years earlier Warren also
helped found the most secret of Masonic Lodges, the Quatuor Coronati Lodge of
Masonic Research. Knight reports that
Warren impeded the investigation of the murders at every turn, caused endless
confusion and delays, and personally destroyed the only clue the Ripper ever
left. This was a scrawled chalk message on a wall inside a tenement block
near the site of the fourth murder. Beneath the message was a blood-soaked
piece of cloth which Jack the Ripper had recently cut from the apron of his
latest victim. The message itself, according to a careful copy made by a
conscientious PC who was at the scene early -- which had been concealed in
the Scotland Yard files on the case for nearly ninety years before I gained
access to them -- read:
"The Juwes are The Men That will not be blamed for nothing"
The moment he was told of this, Warren, who had not previously ventured near
the East End, rushed to the place before the message could be photographed
and washed it away. This has never been explained. The truth was that Warren,
who had been exalted to the Royal Arch in 1861, had realized that the writing
on the wall was a masonic [sicl] message.
Warren, a founder of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge of Masonic Research and by
the time of the Ripper murders a Past Grand Sojourner of the Supreme Grand
Chapter, knew only too well that the writing on the wall was telling the
world, "The Freemasons are the men that will not be blamed for nothing."(74)
The significance of the word "Juwes" in the Ripper's message will not escape
anyone versed in Masonic lore. As Knight pointed out in a previous book, Jack
the Ripper: The Final Solution (1976], Masons refer to themselves as Jews,
and use the word "Gentile," "borrowed from Hebrew and used to mean
non-Masonic."(75)
How does the message at the scene of the fourth "Ripper" murder shed light by
analogy on who may have authored the Protocols? First, it confirms that
Freemasonry establishes decoys, then calls those decoys Jews. Second, the
scrawled chalk message on the wall above the scene of the fourth Ripper
murder can be extrapolated and applied to all Masonic intrigues and their
authors, including authors of the Protocols: 'The Freemasons are the men that
will not be blamed for the Protocols." Third, by making the Protocols read
like a Jewish manuscript, the Gentile Masonic conspiracy continues unimpeded
by sending researchers chasing the Jewish scapegoat.
In 1935, after studying the Protocols and hearing months of testimony, the
court at Berne, Switzerland, declared that they were not of Jewish origin. If
we accept the court's declaration, the only logical explanation for the
Protocols authorship is Gentile Freemasonry: "those that say they are Jews,
and are not, but do lie."
The Protocols is another facet of the age-old plot of Satan to destroy both
Jews and Christians alike.
Stephen Knight's intent in exposing the reason behind the Masonic use of the
word "Juwes" was not to reveal Freemasonry's anti-Semitic symbolism, but to
tie the Protocols to Gentile Freemasonry. He offers even more convincing
evidence of the Protocols Masonic authorship: "The translator of the
Protocols claimed they were in the form of minutes which were removed from a
large book of notes for lectures. They were signed, he said, by Freemasons of
the highest rank, the thirty-third degree."(76)
Thirty-third degree Masons, of course, meet separately from their Masonic
brethren of the lower degrees. Signiflcantly, Edith Miller informs us that
the name of the meeting hall in Paris where the 33rd degree Supreme Council
of Mizraim Masons gathered was the Sanctuary of Levites, corroborating
Knight's discovery that Gentile Masons refer to themselves as Jews.(77)
Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry sheds more light on French Freemasonry's
fixation on becoming Jews, when documenting that in the French lodges,
"Levite" is the "highest of the Masonic Degrees...."(78) How could a person,
or persons, who supposedly forged the Protocols, have known to connect Jewish
terminology used by a Gentile Masonic Lodge in Paris, unless he, or they,
were 33rd degree Masons from that same lodge? We know that Adolphe Cremieux
was that Mason who sat on the Supreme Council of Mizraim Freemasonry. We also
know that the Protocols were stolen from that same Lodge. Stephen Knight
concludes:
It must be stated that the Protocols have been the subject of debate since
they first appeared in print. Hitler twisted their meaning and alleged that
they proved the existence of a worldwide conspiracy by the Jews, and used
them in a hopeless attempt to justify his extermination programme. Chiefly
because of the Nazi atrocities many writers have attacked the Protocols as
forgeries. The argument continues to rage, and there are strong points both
for and against.
An important point to bear in mind is that they had been in existence a long
time before they were finally published.... Forgeries or not, the product of
fanatical minds or not, the fact is they have been taken in deadly
seriousness by thousands of people.
Of course, even accepting for a moment that there were no questions of the
documents' authenticity, it would still be ludicrous to believe that they
form the code by which all Freemasons live. Most Masons do not progress
beyond the third degree, so the vast majority of Freemasons before the
Protocols were published would never have heard of them.
But what they [the Protocols] would have conveyed to those high initiates,
who not only read them, but took them seriously, is fascinating and
disturbing.(79)
The Masonic "Protocol' Conspiracy in Russia
The Reform Jews left Germany for Russia in 1840 to destroy Judaism there.
Their tactics were reprehensible, resulting in violence and bloodletting. In
anger the Reformers spread vicious lies about their Jewish brothers, inciting
Christian Russia to anti-Semitism. The most horrendous were accusations of
blood libels. One such incident took place in the small town of Villovich
where the Reform Jews took revenge on the local rabbi. They dressed up one of
their women as the rabbi's wife. "The impersonation was perfect," wrote Rabbi
Antelman. "She appeared before the local priest and said that she saw the
rabbi kill a Christian child for Passover. Because of this incident, the
rabbi and all the members of his congregation were killed after a brief
trial. The rabbi's wife and his five remaining children were tortured into
accepting Christianity."(80)
Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry confirms that "[i]n Russia the Protocols
were used to back up charges against the Jews for 'ritual murder."(81) Is
Mackey's statement Freemasonry's subtle way of suggesting that the authors of
the Protocols were Reform Jews?
Protocols of Sion and the Priory of Sion
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail suggest that the Priory of Sion, and
not the Reform Jews, was connected to the Protocols of Sion in Russia. The
authors build their case around Rosicrucian French Masons who had worked
their way into the good graces of Czar Nicholas II. Here is their story:
The role of Rasputin at the court of Nicholas and Alexandra of Russia is more
or less generally known. It is not generally known, however, that there were
influential, even powerful esoteric enclaves at the Russian court long before
Rasputin. During the 1890s and 1900s one such enclave formed itself around an
individual known as Monsieur Philippe and around his mentor, who made
periodic visits to the imperial court at Petersburg. And Monsieur Philippe's
mentor was none other than the man called Papus.(82)
Papus (1865-1916), a Gentile, was the Masonic code name for Dr. Gerard
Encausse, a 33rd degree Mason from Paris, who became the occult adviser of
the ill-fated Czar Nicholas II.(83) Papus was Grand Master of both Memphis
and Mizraim Freemasonries, the two Rosicrucian lodges that had merged in
1875. One of Papus's acquaintances was Claude Debussy (1862-1918), a famous
composer who set a number of Victor Hugo's poems to music. Debussy was the
next Grand Master of the Priory of Sion following Hugo's death in 1885, and
reigned in that position until 1918.(84)
Freemason A.E. Waite tells us that in 1894 Papus was also the Grand Master of
the Martinist Masonic Supreme Council in Paris. Martinism admitted both male
and female members on equal terms. This Order had a number of lodges
throughout Europe and Russia. Chapters were also established in Great
Britain, the United States, Argentina and Guatemala, as well as throughout
the Orient.(85)
Martinism was originally founded in 1754 by a Rosicrucian Spanish Jew named
Martines de Pasqually, or Martinez Paschalis. The emblem for this branch of
Freemasonry consists of six dots, which we have learned in a previous chapter
is a subtle form of the Masonic six-pointed star. The six-pointed star is the
same herald of the Priory of Sion, the Mizraim Masonic Lodge and Zionism.(86)
Pasqually's Lodges were first organized at Marseilles, Toulouse, and
Bordeaux, then in Paris. Before long Rosicrucian Martinist lodges spread all
over France, with the center at Lyons. Martinism was thought to have been a
Jewish secret society. It was operated, however in the same manner as was the
Mizraim Lodge, in that Jews and Gentiles alike were members. Behind the
scenes, however, was the Priory of Sion, distinguished by the Rose-Croix
capstone in Martinist Lodges.
Nesta Webster explains: "After the first three Craft degrees came the Cohen
degrees of the same -- Apprentice Cohen, Fellow Craft Cohen, and Master Cohen
-- then those of Grand Architect, Grand Elect of Zerubbabel of Knight of the
East; but above these were concealed degrees leading up to the Rose-Croix,
which formed the capstone of the ediflce."(87)
Webster also claims that Martinist "disciples inherited from Pasqually a
large number of Jewish manuscripts."(88) She leaves the reader with the
impression that these manuscripts are none other than the Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Sion -- in existence a full century before they were stolen
from its sister Mizraim lodge in 1884.(89) If so, these documents may only
have suggested Judaic origins because of the Davidic claims expressed within
them by the Priory of Sion.
A century later the stamp of "Priory of Sion" is even more evident on
Martinism when a Freemason named Alphonse Louis Constant (1810-1875) joined
the Martinist Order. Constant was a Gentile Mason who assumed the Jewish name
-- Eliphas Levi. This is the same Eliphas Levi who assisted the Grand Master
of Sion, Charles Nodier, in methodically sifting and cataloging thousands of
Templar documents looted from the Vatican by Napoleon Bonaparte. Levi was
also acquainted with Nodier's successor, Victor Hugo. After Levi joined the
Martinist Masonic lodge, the lodge merged with both the Memphis and Mizraim
Lodges.
Levi apparently had access to the forgotten Protocol documents in the Mizraim
Lodge a decade before they were discovered in 1884
Webster informs us that "[b]efore his death in 1875 Eliphas Levi announced
that in 1879 a new political and religious 'universal Kingdom' would be
established, and that it would be possessed by 'him who would have the keys
of the East."(90)
Three Protocols have significant relationship to this prophecy:
Protocol 15: When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown
offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the world.
Protocol 17: The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the
patriarch of an international Church.
Protocol 24: I pass now to the method of confirming the dynastic roots of
King David to the last strata of the earth.
The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the world of
the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations.
These Protocols are highly suggestive of the Priory of Sion, those who claim
to be of the seed of David. Eliphas Levi most likely was referring to Sion's
King of Jerusalem cult when he prophesied, "A new political and religious
'universal Kingdom' will be established, and it will be possessed by 'him who
would have the keys of the East."'
The authors of Holy Blood inform us that Victor Hugo and Eliphas Levi were
both members of the same Martinist Lodge.(91) As we have seen, Victor Hugo
was associated with Maurice Joly and Adolphe Cremieux in the sister Lodge of
Mizraim Freemasonry. Papus, who was Grand Master of both the Mizraim and
Memphis lodges, was also a Martinist, and acquainted himself with Hugo's
successor Claude Debussy. AU these men, except Cremieux, were Gentiles.
This circumstantial evidence points to the Priory of Sion as the author of
the Protocols. In the Old Testament, King Solomon
himself, who is revered by all Masons, says in Proverbs 14:9, "The common
bond of rebels is their guilt."(92) In other words, these Masonic rebels are
guilty by association.
French Martinism and English Freemasonry
English Freemason A.E. Waite states that French Martinism had shut its doors
to Masons belonging to English Freemasonry.(93) Yet Edith Miller, in Appendix
IV of Occult Theocrasy, reproduced a private letter dated March 26, 1906,
from one "Dorec" to 33rd degree Grand Orient Mason Theodore Reuss, informing
him that 33rd degree English Mason John Yarker was the Martinist delegate in
London.(94)
Miller claims the existence of another private letter, in which Papus refers
to himself as the delegate of John Yarker for the Swedenborg Rite in France.
Correspondence of this nature between the most noteworthy Masons of that day
contradicts Mr. Waite and reveals that Mr. Waite is spreading disinformation
by alleging a feud between English Masonry and French Martinism where none
exists.(95)
It is true that Rosicrucian English Freemasonry severed fellowship in 1877
with Templar French Grand Orient Freemasonry. However Martinism is not Grand
Orient Templarism, but rather, Rosicrucianism. Naturally there would be a tie
to English Freemasonry. Obviously the French Martinists would want to keep
this familial tie secret in order to keep abreast of the developments in
Templar French Masonry. Martinism apparently functioned as an intelligence
lodge for English Freemasonry, as did Mizraim. Later the two merged with
Memphis, their English counterpart.
A.E. Waite could not have been ignorant of this fact. If cognizant, he would
have published an opposing view in an attempt to hide the facts. His motive
would be to protect Rosicrucian Orders on the Continent, which were
subversive to the Templar Grand Orient. No other interpretation makes sense
of why the hierarchy of the Templar Grand Orient -- Dorec and Reuss -- would
expose the connection.
Apparently, Rosicrucian Martinism was a front for the Priory of Sion. English
Freemasonry used it as an intelligence gathering lodge in the same manner as
it did the Mizraim Lodge. Both having similar doctrine, they merged in 1875.
As the Mizraim Masonic Lodge provided for Great Britain moles in the French
Templar Scottish Rite Lodge, through double agents such as Cremieux and Levi,
so Papus served in that same capacity when Mizraim merged with Martinism
following the deaths of Levi and Cremieux in 1875 and 1880.
There are other Martinist ties to British Freemasonry. In 1887 Martinist
Freemason Papus joined the Theosophist Society, a Rosicrucian order
headquartered in New York, with a branch in Paris. The Theosophist Society
was founded in 1775 by female Freemason Helena Blavatsky, who moved her
headquarters from New York to London in 1887. In 1891 Papus helped found the
Gnostic Catholic Church. In 1895 he became a member of the Order of the
Golden Dawn, an English Masonic Rosicrucian order founded in 1887 in London,
with a branch in the Paris Lodge Ahathoor. In 1902 Papus became Grand Master
of the newly formed homicidal Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.) at Paris, a
spin-off of the Golden Dawn.
In 1899 Philippe de Lyon, protege of Papus, went to Russia and established
the Priory of Sion's Martinist lodge at the imperial court, possibly
initiating Grigorii Rasputin, since it is known that Grigorii was a
Martinist. Philippe was introduced to the Imperial Court first, oddly enough,
by the same man who was Rasputin's sinister adviser, the anti-Zionist and
Reform Jew, Manoussevitch Manouilof (see chapter- 19). In 1900 Papus followed
Philippe to St. Petersburg, where Papus became a confidant of the Czar and
Czarina. Papus visited Russia on at least three occasions, the last in 1906.
When he became Grand Master in France of London's O.T.O., Papus then carried
the rituals of this homicidal Masonic lodge to Russia, initiating many
Russians in St. Petersburg in preparation for the Russian Revolution. Papus
died on October 25, 1916, one year before he could taste the rotten fruits of
his labor in the bloody Bolshevik Revolution.(96)
Substantial evidence suggests that high Masons in France, England and Russia
were involved in the Russian Revolution. In fact communications were shuttled
back and forth between Europe and Russia prior to the Bolshevik Revolution by
high Masons. Among them were 33rd degree John Yarker, who represented the
Martinist Order at London; 33rd degree Papus, who, according to Miller's
documents, was under the control of Yarker; Freemason Philippe, who was the
mentor of Papus; and Rasputin, who in turn was the Martinist mole in the
Royal Court at St. Petersburg following Philippe. AU these High Masons were
Gentiles, not Jews.
As evidenced by the Masonic activities between Russia and France at the turn
of the 20th century, both English and French Freemasonry were cooperating in
fomenting the Russian Revolution. These activities, with the arrival of the
stolen Protocols taken from a French lodge and carried to Russia, were
significant in stopping Zionism at the Russian border. In 1903 the Protocols
of the Learned Elders of Sion were first translated into Russian and
published. Whether engineered by this coalition of subversives or not, the
events which led up to their circulation could not have been by accident.
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail outline the sequence of events. The
Protocols were stolen from the Mizraim Lodge in 1884 and taken to Russia by
Mlle. Justine Glinka. She gave a copy to
Alexis Sukhotin, the marshal of the district of Orel who in turn showed them
to two friends, Stepanov and a contemptible old man named Sergei Nilus. In
1903 Nilus presented the Protocols to the Czar. The Czar, who had placed
himself under the occult council of the two subversive Freemasons, Philippe
and Rasputin, declared the document to be an outrageous fabrication and
ordered all copies of it destroyed. Nilus was banished from the court in
disgrace.(97)
The document, or a copy of it, survived. In 1903 it was serialized in a
newspaper, but failed to attract interest, In 1905 it was published again as
an appendix to a book by a distinguished mystical philosopher, Vladimir
Soloviov. This time it began to attract attention. - In following years it
became one of the single most infamous documents of the twentieth century.(98)
Protocols of the Priory of Sion
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail argue strongly that the Protocols have
a Masonic source -- the Priory of Sion:
Modern scholars have dismissed them as a total forgery, a wholly spurious
document concocted by anti-Semitic interests intent on discrediting Judaism.
And yet the Protocols themselves argue strongly against such a conclusion.
They contain, for example, a number of enigmatic references -references that
are clearly not Judaic. But these references are so clearly not Judaic that
they cannot plausibly have been fabricated by a forger, either. No
anti-Semitic forger with even a modicum of intelligence would possibly have
concocted such references in order to discredit Judaism. For no one would
have believed these references to be of Judaic origin.
Thus, for instance, the text of the Protocols ends with a single statement,
"Signed by the representatives of Sion of the 33rd Degree."
Why would an anti-Semitic forger have made up such a statement? Why would he
not have attempted to incriminate all Jews, rather than just a few -- the few
who constitute "the representatives of Sion of the 33rd Degree?" Why would he
not declare that the document was signed by, say, the representatives of the
international Judaic congress? In fact, the "representatives of Sion of the
33rd Degree" would hardly seem to refer to Judaism at all, or to any
"international Jewish conspiracy." If anything, it would seem to refer to
something specifically Masonic.
The Protocols contain other even more flagrant anomalies. The text speaks
repeatedly, for example, of the advent of a "Masonic kingdom."
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail concluded: "On the basis of prolonged
and systematic research we reached certain conclusions about the Protocols of
the Elders of Sion. They are:
1. There was an original text on which the published version of the Protocols
was based. This original text was not a forgery. On the contrary, it was
authentic. But it had nothing whatever to do with Judaism or an
"international Jewish conspiracy." It issued, rather, from some Masonic
organization or Masonically oriented secret society that incorporated the
word "Sion."
2. The original text on which the published version of the Protocols was
based need not have been provocative or inflammatory in its language. But it
may very well have included a program for gaining power, for infiltrating
Freemasonry, for controlling social, political, and economic institutions.
3. The original text on which the published version of the Protocols was
based fell into the hands of Sergei Nilus. Nilus did not at first intend it
to discredit Judaism. On the contrary, he brought it to the czar with the
intention of discrediting the esoteric enclave at the imperial court -- the
enclave of Papus, Monsieur Philippe, and others who were members of the
secret society in question. Before doing so he almost certainly doctored the
language, rendering it far more venomous and inflammatory than it initially
was. When the czar spurned him, Nilus then released the Protocols for
publication in their doctored form. They had failed in their primary
objective of compromising Papus and Monsieur Philippe. But they might still
serve a secondary purpose -that of fostering anti-Semitism. Although Nilus'
chief targets had been Papus and Monsieur Philippe, he was hostile to Judaism
as well.
4. The published version of the Protocols is not, therefore, a totally
fabricated text. It is. rather, a radically altered text. But despite the
alterations certain vestiges of the original version can be discerned....
These vestiges -- which referred to a king, a Pope, an international church,
and to Sion -
probably meant little or nothing to Nilus. He certainly would not have
invented them himself. But if they were already there, he would have had no
reason, given his ignorance, to excise them. And while such vestiges might
have been irrelevant to Judaism, they might have been extremely relevant to a
secret society. As we learned subsequently, they were -- and still are -- of
paramount importance to the Prieure de Sion.(99)
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail conclude that the Protocols issued from
the 33rd Degree Supreme Council of the Rite of Mizraim, which in turn is
controlled by the Priory of Sion! They were "signed by the representatives of
Sion of the 33rd Degree." The phrase "representatives of Sion" does not imply
that the signatories were part of a group called "Sion," but rather, is
indicative of agents, or, shall we say, a front for some organization which
incorporates the name "Sion": namely the Priory of Sion. The Mizraim Lodge
was that front.
The mistake made by the Supreme Council of Mizraim is the mistake made by all
Freemasonry. It never destroys any of its written work. Every word spoken in
every Supreme Council throughout the world is recorded and safeguarded for
posterity.
A handful of modern conspiracy researchers link the covert Priory of Sion to
the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion. These investigators do not see
the Protocols associated in any way with genuine Jewish Zionism that exists
overtly. J.R. Church is one of them. He said, 'The title itself, which
mentions the 'learned elders of Zion,' seems to refer to the mystery religion
of the so-called Holy Grail and to the Priory of Sion organized by Godfroi de
Bouillon in 1099 for the purpose of establishing a world government and
providing a Merovingian king for its throne."(100)
Commentary on the Protocols of Sion
Protocol 1: Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of
power will be more invisible than any other, because it will remain invisible
until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any
longer undermine it.
Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which
we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many
centuries brought to naught.
This Protocol describes an organism that houses a hidden "power." We believe
the organism is Freemasonry housing the Priory of Sion.
It was the Priory of Sion that founded the Rose-Croix, which In turn founded
English Freemasonry. This began many centuries ago, as the Protocol indicates.
The statement, "Before us is a plan...the line from which we cannot deviate
without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to
naught," suggests that Sion is in serious trouble. Perhaps this refers to the
establishment of the unexpected movement of Zionism in Russia. The "plan"
which is "before us" may also refer to a takeover of Russia to stop the
Zionist movement.
Protocol 3: To-day [sic] I may tell you that our goal is now only a few steps
off. There remains a small space to cross and the whole long path we have
trodden is ready now to close its cycle of the Symbolic Snake, by which we
symbolize our people. When this ring closes, all the States of Europe will be
locked in its coil as in a powerful vise.
When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned
it is these same hands which will sweep away everything that might be a
hindrance thereto.
"Ours" they will not touch, because the moment of attack will be known to us
and we shall take measures to protect our own.
Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment
to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favour of
that King-Despot of the blood of Sion, whom we are preparing for the world.
The symbols referred to in this Protocol are of course Rosicrucian. The
symbol of the Priory of Sion's Rosicrucian Order is a rose representing the
Serpent, wormed around the upright part of the Christian Cross. The second
symbol of the Rosicrucians was the circle, or snake biting its own tail,
superimposed on the Christian cross. This same symbol of the snake is
incorporated in the 33rd degree Masonic Jewel (Appendix 2, Fig. 7).
Dr. John Coleman, a retired British intelligence officer, states in Black
Nobility Unmasked, that the Monarchs of Europe have always referred to
themselves as "Crowned Cobras." The monarchs of Europe carry the Grail blood.
AU of them, according to Coleman, are Masons of the British obedience.
The statement: "'Ours' they will not touch," etc., eliminates the possibility
that the Protocol is Jewish. If the Protocols outlined a Jewish conspiracy,
the "our" would have evaded the holocaust of Hitler, according to this
Protocol. Yet, after World War II it was Freemasonry, as we shall learn in
chapter 24, that came back stronger than ever, founding the United Nations.
Finally, this Protocol identifies the Priory of Sion with the statement
"King-Despot of the blood of Sion, whom we are preparing for the world." This
obviously refers to Sion's reigning "King of Jerusalem."
Protocol 4: Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force?
And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry [sic] blindly serves
as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even
its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.
As we have seen, the Priory of Sion's kings believe themselves to be Jews.
When the Priory founded Freemasonry, it was mainly Gentiles who joined.
Gentiles are its predominant members and leaders. Naturally the Priory would
call Freemasonry "Gentile Masonry."
Protocol 5: In place of the rulers of to-day [sic] we shall set up a bogey
which will be called the Super-Government Administration. Its hands will
reach out in all direction like nippers and its organization will be of such
colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the
world.
What is the "bogey" that is to be called "the Super-Government
Administration?" There are two possibilities here. First, this could refer to
Russian Communism, which would be used to conquer the world. The top
governing power in the U.S.S.R. was called the Supreme Soviet. Soviet in
Russian means Council.. In other words, it was the Supreme Council that ruled
former Soviet Russia, the same Supreme Council we find in 33rd degree
Freemasonry. Second, this body could be the League of Nations. Following
World War I, as we shall see in chapter 21, the League was founded by French
Freemasonry. After World War II, English Freemasonry founded the United
Nations. The United States of Europe will be a reality by 1993. We shall
learn that it too is of Masonic origin. From this may come the world kingdom
of the Beast -- the ultimate "bogey."
Protocol 8: We shall surround our government with a whole world of
economists. That is the reason why economic sciences [work] [They come] from
the principal subject of the teaching given to the Jews. Around us again will
be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and -- the
main thing -- millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled
by the question of figures.
Notice this Protocol mentions the "Jews," but in a disconnected sense, as if
they are used by the conspiracy for their economic prowess alone. This
Protocol suggests why English Freemasonry is overloaded with Jewish bankers
and economists. The Priory of Sion admits that Jews are superior
economically. Incidentally, the word "Jew" is mentioned only twice in the
Protocols, and both times in a disconnected sense.
Protocol 10: These schemes will not turn existing institutions upside down
just yet. They will only affect changes in their economy and consequently in
the whole combined movement of their progress, which will thus be directed
along the paths laid down in our schemes.
By such measures we shall obtain the power of destroying little by little,
step by step, all that at the outset when we enter on our rights, we are
compelled to introduce into the constitutions of States to prepare for the
transition to an imperceptible abolition of every kind of constitution, and
then the time is come to turn every form of government into our despotism.
This Protocol enunciates the format of English Freemasonry, called
"gradualism," whereas its adversary, French Masonry, takes over rapidly and
viciously.
Protocol 15: When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown
offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the world.
Twelve royal families in Europe today have Grail blood flowing through their
veins. Two of them carry the title of "King of Jerusalem:" Otto von Habsburg,
Pretender to the Austrian throne, and Juan Carlos, King of Spain.
Protocol 17: The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the
patriarch of an international Church.
But, in the meantime, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional
religions and afterwards in ours, we shall not overtly lay a finger on
existing churches, but we shall fight them by criticism calculated to produce
schism....
Notice that "The King of the Jews" will replace the Pope. Jews would not be
concerned with replacing the Pope. They do not even recognize the Church. On
the other hand, the Priory of Sion used the Catholic Church to build its
empire. It was subject to the Roman Church for centuries, but withdrew during
the Reformation, and through Freemasonry became adversarial to the Church.
Naturally, the Priory would want to call their king "the real Pope of the
Universe."
Also, notice the reference to New Age religion. Before the New Age can be
perfected, the Protocol states that "criticism" must first divide the Church.
This "criticism" is likely the new "Biblical criticism," the sources of which
Orthodox Rabbi Marvin Antelman has revealed to us. In his book, To Eliminate
The Opiate, he devotes a whole chapter entitled "The Birth of Biblical
Criticism" to the subject. He lays Biblical Criticism at the feet of the
Frankist-Reform Jews who were protected by illuminated Masonic lodges in
Germany. Rabbi Antelman confirms that Biblical criticism did not originate
with Orthodox Jews, but rather, was orchestrated by apostate Jews bent on the
destruction of Judeo-Christian religion.
Protocol 20: We shall so hedge about our system of accounting that neither
the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant will be in a position to
divert even the smallest sum from its destination [sic] with-out detection or
to direct it in another direction except that which will be once fixed in a
definite plan of action.
Is this the Mark of the Beast?
Protocol 24: I pass now to the method of confirming the dynastic roots of
King David to the last strata of the earth.
Certain members of the seed of David will prepare the kings and their heirs,
selecting not by right of heritage but by eminent capacities, inducting them
into the most secret mysteries of the political, into schemes of government,
but providing always that none may come to knowledge of the secrets. The
object of this mode of action is that all may know that government cannot be
entrusted to those who have not been inducted into the secret places of its
art.
The king's plans of action for the current moment, and all the more so for
the future, will be unknown, even to those who are called his closest
counselors.
Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is
coming.
The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the world of
the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations.
The Priory of Sion is the protector of the so-called seed of King David.
Notice in the second paragraph the statement that many kings and their heirs
are being prepared, but only one will be selected. There are twelve royal
families of Grail blood in Europe today. The entire 24th Protocol seems to
describe the "hidden hand" in the Priory of Sion, which we believe is housed
in the 33rd degree of English Freemasonry.
pp333-372
-----
--notes--
Chapter 13
1. "Anti-Semitism and Masonry," Mackey's Encyclopedia of
Freemasonry, Vol. III.
2. Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration (Costa Mesa,
CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1988) 30.
3. "Israel," World Economic Review, November 1986: 13.
4. John 64.
5. Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, trans. James Murphy (1939; Los
Angeles: Angriff Press, 1981) 174.
6. Antelman, entire.
7. Antelman 33.
8. Antelman 35-38.
9. John 29.
10. Antelman 33.
11. Antelman.
12. Conspiracy researchers have accused Rothschild of siding
with the Communists when he withdrew his financial
support from the anti-Communist White Army.
13. Hitler 174.
14. John Coleman, King Makers: King Breakers = The Cecils,
audiotape 1984, Christian Defense League.
15. Karl Bergmeister, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion before
the Court in Berne (1938; Mettairie, LA: Sons of Liberty, n.d.)
entire.
The author and his wife were in Basel, Switzerland, August 1987. The author
offered to pay a Swiss history professor his required fee to obtain copies of
the Berne court proceedings on the Protocols. The professor became very
interested and began to ask questions. When the author mentioned the Masonic
connection the historian coldly said, "I don't think I want to work for you."
16. Since the exiling of the Templars from Great Britain, all
Grand Masters of Sion have been from the Continent.
17. Miller 410-411.
18. Miller 411.
19. Baigent et al, Holy Blood 192, 435-436.
20. Church 90.
21. Miller 407.
22. James A. Malcolm, Origins of the Balfour Declaration, Dr.
Weizmann's Contribution (1944; Torrance, CA: Institute for
Historical Review, 19831 6-7.
A copy of this document, only 12 pages long, is in the
British Museum, and in 1964 was placed in the Harvard
University Library.
23. John 30.
24. Bible, Pilgrim Edition, footnote #6 on Amos 5:26.
25. Spaulding 91.
26. Geoffrey Wigoder, The Story of the Synagogue, A Diaspora
Museum Book (Jerusalem: Domino Press, 1986) 20, 49, 79,
90, 103, 152, 165, 174, 186, 194.
27. John 30.
28. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield, MA:
Merriam-Webster, 1987).
29. John 30.
30. Miller 407-408, 443.
31. "Mizraim, Rite of," Mackey's Encyclopedia, Vol. II.
32. Miller 407-408, 443.
33. Robinson 77.
34. Some of the information the author has been able to gather
for this book has come directly from Masons, who readily
answered his questions after he had given them the Masonic
handshake.
35. Dillon 83.
This is still practiced today. For example, when the
United States Congress failed to back the Contras
financially, President Reagan went to the CIA for funding.
Hence, the famed "Iran/Contra Affair" involving Oliver
North.
36. The Growing Menace of Freemasonry in Britain, 6th ed.
(London: n.p., 1936) 17.
37. de Poncins, Freemasonry and the Vatican 196.
38. Curt Gentry, J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets, (New
York: Plume, 1991) 148-149).
39 Stephen Knight, The Brotherhood 284.
40. Knight 290.
41. John Coleman, "Spy Scandals and Secret Societies," World
Economic Review, October 1984: 1.
42. Phillip Knightley, The Master Spy (New York: Alfred A.
Knopf, 1989) picture facing page 117.
43. A book entitled Henry Kissinger, Soviet Agent was published
in 1974 by Frank A. Capell, and reprinted by Sons of
Liberty in 1987. The author documents that Kissinger was
born and raised in Germany during the Nazi regime.
According to Capell, as a member of the German Communist
Party, Kissinger was easily recruited by the KGB after the
war and sent to America to be tutored by Nelson Rockefeller.
Henry Kissinger is a man of many colors. He is a
Freemason, and member of all three Masonic obediences --
English, American and French.
44. Knight, The Brotherhood 284, 286.
45. de Poncins, Secret Powers 51.
46. Miller 417-418.
47. de Poncins, Secret Powers 51.
48. Miller 270, 733.
49. Miller 412.
50. Webster, Secret Societies 441.
51. Miller 493.
52. Miller 490.
53. Miller 491.
54. Webster, Secret Societies 410.
55. Webster 411.
56. Miller 492.
57. Miller 492-493.
58. Miller 526.
59. Miller 267, 722.
60. Miller 244.
61. Miller 244, 264, 274.
62. Miller 273-274.
63. Miller 268.
64. "Hugo, Victor - Political Life," Encyclopaedia Britannica:
Macropaedia.
65. Webster, Secret Societies 409.
66. Nilus 100.
67. Nilus.
68. Miller 408.
69. Nilus 158.
70. Nilus 181.
71. Knight, The Brotherhood 216.
72. Knight 49.
73. Knight 54.
74. Knight 54-55.
75. Stephen Knight, Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution (1976;
London: Granada, 1977) 158-159.
76. Knight, Jack the Ripper 161.
77. Miller 407.
78. "Levite of the External Guard," Mackey's Encyclopedia, Vol. i.
79. Knight, Jack the Ripper 161 - 162.
80. Antelman 101.
81. "Anti-Semitism and Masonry," Mackey's Encyclopedia, Vol.
III.
82. Baigent 190.
83. Miller 353, 735.
84. Baigent 131, 154.
85. Waite, "Martinist Rose-Croix," A New Encyclopaedia of
Freemasonry, vol. 2, 161- 163.
Arthur Edward Waite, born in Brooklyn, New York, in 1857,
was
taken to England by his English mother at the age of two
following the death of his father. Waite never returned to
America, although he had been given honorary degrees and
positions in American lodges. Waite Joined English
Freemasonry
when he came of age.
86. Miller 354. (see Appendix 2, Fig. 5A in Scarlet
and
Beast, Vol. 1).
87. Webster, Secret Societies 166.
88. Webster 165- 166.
89. Webster 310.
90. Webster.
91. Baigent 436.
92. Bible, Living Bible (LB).
93. Waite 161.
94. Miller 354.
95. Miller.
96. Baigent 462.
97. There are many theories concerning the origin of the
"Protocols." One is that they were published in 1903 under
the direction of Czar Nicholas II, for which he invested the
staggering sum of thirteen million rubles, and encouraged
Nilus to prepare it. This theory was one of the first to be
promoted, before it was discovered that there was an
original in French, and that the documents were stolen in
1884 from a French Masonic Lodge. Some still promote this
theory, although it has long since been discredited.
98. Baigent 190-195.
99. Baigent.
100. Church 169.
pp824-827
-----
Aloha, He'Ping
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Peace Be, Amen.
Roads End
Kris
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
