In case you have any illusions about Al Gore's principles when it comes to
protecting the public from corporate chemical predation, pick up and read
Toxic Deception: How the Chemical Industry Manipulates Science, Bends the
Law, and Endangers Your Health by Dan Fagin, Marianne Lavelle and the
Center for Public Integrity (Common Courage Press, 1999).

The book, first published in 1997, has a new afterword, starring Al Gore.

In 1996, Congress amended the federal pesticides laws with something
called the Food Quality Protection Act. It was an election year, and the
Republicans wanted to pass something that made them look a touch Green. To
spur them on, new studies emerged linking legal but toxic chemicals to
childhood illnesses and hormone disrupting effects.

The law called on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to review all
of its regulated pesticides and take a fresh look at whether or not those
products have hormone-disrupting effects and whether they pose a special
risk to children.

Immediately after the law was passed, the chemical industry, led by the
Chemical Manufacturers Association and the American Crop Protection
Association (those good folks at the pesticide companies who bring you the
news on National "Public" Radio (NPR)), started whipping up anti-EPA
sentiment among farmers and small businessmen, and their legion of lawyers
and lobbyists began working pulling strings in Washington.

But in early 1998, a rumor began to spread in Washington that the EPA was
moving to restrict many of the organophosphate pesticides -- perhaps
including the wildly popular household insecticide chlorphyrifos (Dursban)
-- because of the risks they posed to children.

The industry cranked up its public relations machinery into high gear.
"The American Crop Protection Association used their web site and direct
mail to get thousands of farmers to write in to the EPA, and if farmers
didn't really know what to say in their letters, well the pesticide
industry was happy to supply the wording and to mail the letters, too,"
Fagin, the environment reporter for Newsday, told us recently.

Two farm belt Democrats -- Charles Stenholm of Texas and Marion Berry of
Arkansas -- visited  Vice President Gore to warn that he would face a
tough time in important farm states like Iowa, Texas, Florida and
California in the 2000 elections if the EPA moved against the
organophosphate pesticides it was considering banning.

"Soon after this visit, and after a lot of lobbying pressure from the
industry, Gore directly ordered the EPA to slow down its implementation of
these tougher pesticide standards that were required by the FQPA," Fagin
told us. "He also told the EPA to make a special effort to consider the
needs of agribusiness and the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
A new advisory committee, which included many of the key chemical
manufacturers and their consultants, was set up to review implementation
of the new law. That committee is still meeting, and the EPA still hasn't
moved against organophosphates."

The guts of Toxic Deception shows that Al Gore is not exceptional in his
tendency to kowtow to the industry -- he's just part of a system of
lawmaking and policing that has been overwhelmed by a powerful industry
that has no match in Washington.

The authors looked at four heavily regulated chemicals -- alachlor,
atrazine, formaldehyde and perchloroethylene. They found that studies of
these chemicals funded by the chemical industry tended to find the
chemicals innocent, while studies financed by non-industry sources tended
to find the four chemicals to be dangerous to human health.

The authors reviewed 161 studies of the chemicals on file at the National
Library of Medicine and found that of 43 industry- funded studies, only
six returned results unfavorable to the chemicals. But in the 118 studies
conducted by non-industry researchers, 71 were unfavorable.

The chemical companies are required by federal law to make any scientific
findings available to the government if a chemical already on the market
is found to pose a "substantial risk of injury to health or to the
environment."

The authors found that the industry frequently acted in "bad faith" in
this regard. In 1991 and 1992, when the EPA offered amnesty from big-money
fines to any manufacturer that turned in health studies they should have
provided under the law earlier, manufacturers suddenly turned over more
than 10,000 studies showing that their products already on the market pose
a substantial risk, the authors reported.

Toxic Deception is also highly critical of the revolving door between the
EPA and the chemical industry. Of the 344 lobbyists and lawyers identified
as having worked from 1990 to 1995 for the chemical companies and trade
associations, at least 135 came from federal departments or agencies or
congressional offices.

In Washington, the chemical industry sets the agenda and has overpowered
the nation's system of safeguarding the public health.

The public be damned.

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor. They are authors of Corporate Predators: The Hunt
for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Common Courage Press, 1999)
-- see www.corporatepredators.org.

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following all in one line:

subscribe corp-focus <your name> (no period).

Focus on the Corporation columns are posted on the Corporate Predators web
site, <www.corporatepredators.org>.

Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
comment on the columns, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Reply via email to