-Caveat Lector-

Survival instincts vs. political correctness

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20011018-27353210.htm

Mona Charen

     Most of us can live with fear  not happily, of course, but you endure
what you must  and people are more resilient than our therapeutic culture
has suggested lately. But while Americans are flinty and will be
courageous as required, we ought not be asked to withstand more than
necessary. There are two ways in which our government may be asking that
of us.
     The first is political correctness. While it is very true that we
cannot and should not declare war against all Muslims worldwide, and while
we cannot and should not persecute, insult or harass Arabs and Muslims
within our borders, we must take steps to reduce our vulnerability to
those who mean us terrible harm. If we are truly facing the threat of
radiation weapons, biological agents or chemical weapons, then we are
dealing with threats to our very survival as a nation. And if that is so,
then should delicacy about political correctness inhibit us from doing
everything necessary to defend ourselves?
     The FBI, reports Time magazine, is urgently searching for a group of
about 30 Arab men who have received licenses to transport hazardous
materials. These men, some of whom spoke little or no English, enrolled in
a driving school in Denver, Colo., in groups of two and three over the
past two years. Each small group was accompanied by the same interpreter.
They paid in cash, and after receiving their licenses, never looked for
work. They have disappeared.
     Attorney General John Ashcroft informs us there are at least 190
individuals associated with al Qaeda inside the United States whom
authorities have been unable to apprehend. Those are the 190 we know
about.
     We keep congratulating ourselves on what an open society we are.
Fine, but let's not congratulate ourselves into an early grave. There are
thousands of Arabs in the United States at this moment on student and
travel visas. They should all be asked, politely and without prejudice, to
go home. This will work hardships in many cases, and that is regrettable.
But, there is no constitutional right to visit the United States. There is
no constitutional right for foreign students to study here.
     This is not a proposal for concentration camps or even preventive
detention (and this would not apply to citizens of Middle Eastern origin
though they, too, should receive some scrutiny). It should be done more in
sorrow than in anger, because we know only a tiny fraction of these people
mean us harm. But we cannot take chances. This is no more than common
sense.
     As for those missing hazardous materials drivers, the only answer is
ethnic profiling. Every Middle Eastern-looking truck driver should be
pulled over and questioned wherever he may be in the United States.
     There is a second fear that looms even larger: smallpox. Unlike
anthrax, it is highly contagious and easy to transport. Unlike chemical
weapons, it is easy to distribute. It could easily overwhelm us. All
Americans born after about 1972 are unvaccinated. As for those over age 30
who received the vaccine at birth, there is serious doubt that the vaccine
remains effective, since booster shots would have been required every
decade.
     Something like 30 percent of those who contract smallpox will die a
slow and painful death. Our health systems would be rapidly overwhelmed by
such an epidemic. The economy would be destroyed, and national morale
could crack as nearly every family buried at least one member.
     The government was ahead of the curve (for once), appropriating
several million dollars in the late '90s for smallpox vaccine. But even
the most optimistic assumptions cannot get all 280 million of us
inoculated in less than two years (three is more realistic.)
     During the Gulf war, the United States privately warned Iraq that if
chemical or biological weapons were used against our troops, we would
consider all forms of retaliation. That was a balance of terror  just what
we need now. Nations can be deterred, but can terrorists?
     Only perhaps, by this: the certainty that in the 21st century, an
epidemic cannot be contained on one continent. Even without a threat of
retaliation in kind, the terrorists must be given to understand, by
whatever method, that once unleashed, smallpox cannot be controlled. And
the Muslim world would surely be even more devastated by it than would we.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to