On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:15:59AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
After much deliberation, I have decide to put my packages up for
adoption. I have not had enough free time to properly maintain my
packages for quite some time. Unfortunately, this is not going to
change for the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:03:34AM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Python 3.2 is no longer supported upstream, and many packages now
require newer versions. Any idea on a timeframe for a coordinated
upgrade to 3.4.2?
After much deliberation, I have decide to put my packages up for
adoption. I
maintainers:
octave Marco Atzeri
perl Reini Urban/Achim Gratz ?!?
php Yaakov Selkowitz
python Jason Tishler/Yaakov Selkowitz
RMarco Atzeri
ruby Yaakov Selkowitz
As for perl, are you still with us Reini? As for python, Jason,
you're still
Daniel,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote:
[snip]
To accomplished this, procmail would have to be modified slightly.
From the Cygwin website, I can see that procmail is maintained bij
Jason Tishler.
I need
Yaakov,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:38:35AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2014-06-24 09:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
A security vulnerability (CVE-2014-4616) has been announced in python
and python3 builtin _json modules. Patches have been committed
upstream; could we get the latest 2.7.7
Yaakov,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:42:02PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2014-06-30 19:57, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:38:35AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2014-06-24 09:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
A security vulnerability (CVE-2014-4616) has been announced
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And then there is python. Jason, are you set up to build 64 bit
packages yet?
Yes.
Jason
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:54:31AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 16 01:19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:23:08PM -0500, David Boyce wrote:
Jason et al,
Here's a suggested new flag (with patch, attached) for
/usr/bin/rebaseall. It adds a -w(ait) flag which
David,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:30:54AM -0500, David Boyce wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jason Tishler ja...@tishler.net wrote:
AFAICT, there is a race condition issue with the proposed
functionality. David's build servers could be quiescent when the
check for running
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.4.1-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is the change since the previous release:
* Fix uninitialized variable problem as described in:
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.4.1-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is the change since the previous release:
* Fix uninitialized variable problem as described in:
Corinna,
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 01:23:00PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 30 06:32, David Stacey wrote:
Jason Tishler: As rebase maintainer, if you agree with my diagnosis
then please could you make new versions of 'rebase' containing the
fix for both architectures. Thank you
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:28:31PM +0900, nu774 wrote:
Installing libffi-devel will let python pick system libffi, so you
can skip that libffi building part you are currently stuck.
(2013/10/15 10:10), Ryan Johnson wrote:
Ryan,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 02:44:49PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 31/10/2013 2:11 PM, Jason Tishler wrote:
It appears that others have successfully built Python under 64-bit
Cygwin without resorting to my workaround. Does anyone know what I'm
missing?
Try installing pkg-config
Yaakov,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:30:28PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
As part of the 64bit bootstrap process, I packaged python3, but had
to configure it --without-threads due to a runtime error. However,
I am finding now that this is not a regularly used configuration;
several major
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:45:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
No.
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
Yes, but I need to purchase it and schedule converting one of PCs from
32- to 64-bit Windows.
3) Are you willing to
Corinna,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 06:23:11PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 13 10:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Below is an entirely new patch. Not only that the cyg64 prefix got
dropped, but only With these changes rebase builds fine on
x86_64-pc-cygwin. There are a few problems
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:17:50PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 11 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
The following patchset is an attempt to merge perlrebase/rubyrebase/etc.
into rebaseall, for reasons I previously discussed last month:
The patches look good to me. Jason, what do you think?
New News:
===
*** Cygwin has migrating from Python 2.6 to 2.7. ***
I have updated the version of Python to 2.7.3-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is the only change since the previous release:
o promote from experimental
New News:
===
*** Cygwin has migrating from Python 2.6 to 2.7. ***
I have updated the version of Python to 2.7.3-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is the only change since the previous release:
o promote from experimental
Yaakov,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:30:19AM -0600, Yaakov wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:56:56 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Jason Tishler announced last month[1] that he intends to upgrade
Python to 2.7 on 01 February, which is quickly approaching.
Jason,
Everything but python-brlapi
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 06:56:56PM -0600, Yaakov wrote:
Jason Tishler announced last month[1] that he intends to upgrade
Python to 2.7 on 01 February, which is quickly approaching.
If anybody needs them, my Python-dependent distro packages have been
rebuilt and are available in a staging
Will,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:13:19AM -0600, Will Renkel wrote:
I ran rebase all on cygwin/Win7 combination.
It did NOT fix EXIM, possibly others.
How do I get either rebase to do it
or is there another way to fix EXIM?
Please heed the following:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.4.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is the change since the previous release:
* Improve 64 bit support.
I would like to thank Corinna Vinschen for providing the above change.
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.4.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is the change since the previous release:
* Improve 64 bit support.
I would like to thank Corinna Vinschen for providing the above change.
Corinna,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:37:10PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
While looking into Marco's rebase problem I noticed that 64 bit support
in rebase was not complete. 64 bit uses IMAGE_REL_BASED_DIR64 relocation
entries, which were simply ignored since only the 32 bit variation
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:48:25PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
It seems the dependency was wrongly adjusted for the
test version: 2.7.3-1
Today:
setup-timestamp: 1356006675
requires: crypt libbz2_1 libdb4.5 libexpat1 libffi4 libgcc1 libgdbm4
libintl8 libncursesw10 libreadline7
*** Attention Cygwin Python module package maintainers ***
*** Cygwin is migrating from Python 2.6 to 2.7... ***
New News:
===
I have released Cygwin Python 2.7.3-1 as experimental. The tarballs
should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The main purpose of this release
*** Attention Cygwin Python module package maintainers ***
*** Cygwin is migrating from Python 2.6 to 2.7... ***
New News:
===
I have released Cygwin Python 2.7.3-1 as experimental. The tarballs
should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The main purpose of this release
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:13:01AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Out of curiosity, what typically holds back releasing a new version?
Do you often end up having to deal with bugs and patches?
Usually it is a round tuit.
Ryan,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:09:01PM -0500, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all (attn python maintainer),
Would it be possible to update to python 2.7? The current released
package (2.6.8-2) lacks several features available in 2.7.
Are you psychic? I just started today. Sorry, but I don't have
Yaakov,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:29:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-07-23 16:17, Jason Tishler wrote:
I uploaded the python3 packages to the following:
sourceware.org:~jlt63/staging/python3-3.2.3-1
Would you mind making a quick review before I copy them to the release
New News:
===
I have released Cygwin Python 3.2.3-1. The tarballs should be available
on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
This is the first, official Python 3 release in the Cygwin standard
distribution and consists of the following packages:
o idle3-3.2.3-1
o python3-3.2.3-1
New News:
===
I have released Cygwin Python 3.2.3-1. The tarballs should be available
on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
This is the first, official Python 3 release in the Cygwin standard
distribution and consists of the following packages:
o idle3-3.2.3-1
o python3-3.2.3-1
Yaakov,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:39:28PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-07-18 14:36, Jason Tishler wrote:
BTW, to get the _dbm module to build I had to change 3.1-dbm.patch as
follows:
[snip]
Additionally, I removed --with-dbmliborder=gdbm from CYGCONF_ARGS.
Since we're using
New News:
===
I have updated the version of fetchmail to 6.3.21-1. The tarballs
should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The only changes between this version and the previous one is the
following:
o update to version 6.3.21
o resolve the SSL certificate validation
New News:
===
I have updated the version of fetchmail to 6.3.21-1. The tarballs
should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The only changes between this version and the previous one is the
following:
o update to version 6.3.21
o resolve the SSL certificate validation
Yaakov,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:47:47AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-06-26 02:51, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 13:18 -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
I really appreciate your feedback. Can you post your WIP Python 3.2
cygport script and patches?
http://cygwin
Achim,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:31:23PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
Will do. Might need a day or two.
I decided to do it right now. The patch stack against CVS is
attached. The change to build.sh is unchanged since I don't
understand what or how Jason wants it
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.3.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* Add -O/--oblivious option to support the rebasing of temporary
DLLs.
* Fix typo in
Sorry for the delay, but I was AFK...
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:29:25PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Not speaking for all, just for me, I like the idea to make the
switch a simple switch without argument.
I like this idea too. One benefit of this new functionality
Yaakov,
I really appreciate your feedback. Can you post your WIP Python 3.2
cygport script and patches? See below for my comments.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:59:42AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-06-14 13:56, Jason Tishler wrote:
See attached for a diff between your python3
Yaakov,
See attached for a diff between your python3-3.1.5rc1-1 cygport script
and my WIP 3.2 one. I'm still deciding on which patches to include
and/or getting them to apply cleanly, so ignore those diffs for now.
I'm most interested in your feedback on my changes to src_install(), so
please
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.6.8-2. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
o build against expat 2.1.0 so pyexpat builds cleanly:
Warren,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 04:27:09PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
On 6/8/2012 12:14 PM, Jason Tishler wrote:
Can the Cygwin expat maintainer please release expat 2.1.0 at his/her
earliest convenience?
His earliest convenience was about five minutes ago. See the RFU
message if you want
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.6.8-2. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
o build against expat 2.1.0 so pyexpat builds cleanly:
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.6.8-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
o upgrade to Python 2.6.8
Old News:
===
Python is an interpreted, interactive,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:52:13AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.6.8-1. The tarballs should
be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
o upgrade to Python
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.6.8-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
o upgrade to Python 2.6.8
Old News:
===
Python is an interpreted, interactive,
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.2.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* Add --no-dynamicbase option to rebase.
* Change rebaseall to call rebase with the
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.2.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* Add --no-dynamicbase option to rebase.
* Change rebaseall to call rebase with the
Yaakov,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 03:02:24PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-04-17 13:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-04-17 09:06, Jason Tishler wrote:
Yaakov,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Security vulnerabilities have been announced
Corinna,
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 12:02:51PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jason, ping?
Did we reach consensus on the approach to resolve the bug found by Achim
Gratz?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00027.html
Are we going with the sed -r or escaping the question mark option?
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:51:19AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 3 06:59, Achim Gratz wrote:
In addition, there should be a picket fence in front of those
expression(s), too. Otherwise they match other lines that are not
supposed to be deleted (the DLL lines are probably safe, but
Corinna,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jason, Ping?
I will release an updated rebase as soon as I can find some free time.
Thanks,
Jason
Corinna,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:49:18PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 30 08:08, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jason, Ping?
I will release an updated rebase as soon as I can find some free
time.
Does that mean I
Yaakov,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Security vulnerabilities have been announced in Python (CVE-2011-3389,
CVE-2012-0845, CVE-2012-0876, CVE-2012-1150) and are fixed in 2.6.8.
I will release 2.6.8 as soon as I can.
After that, do you have plans for 2.7
Corinna,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 06:15:59PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jason? Ping?
On Mar 19 18:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 19 12:59, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:57:41AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jason? Ping?
I looked through the patch
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.1.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* Add rebase/rebaseall touch file (i.e., -t option) support.
* Add rebaseall setup (i.e.,
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.1.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* Add rebase/rebaseall touch file (i.e., -t option) support.
* Add rebaseall setup (i.e.,
Corinna,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:57:41AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jason? Ping?
I looked through the patch and it seems OK. ATM, that's the best I can
do. Let me know when to release a new package.
Thanks,
Jason
Hans Peter,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:23:37PM +0100, Hans Peter Jepsen wrote:
Dear Jason
I hope you can help me.
In the future, please heed the following:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE
I googled for an answer, but did not find any.
What about the following Google search on
:
[snip]
Thanks very much to all involved in this transition!
Of course, special thanks to Yaakov for coordinating this.
Ditto!
And, also, special thanks to Jason Tishler who managed to fit this
effort into his currently hectic schedule.
You are quite welcome.
Nice job all. What
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.6.7-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
o upgrade to Python 2.6.7
o build against Unix X11 Tcl/Tk
o patch for
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.6.7-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
o upgrade to Python 2.6.7
o build against Unix X11 Tcl/Tk
o patch for
Yaakov,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:57:57AM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Idle is a good example of a Tkinter app. If you followed my upgrade
instructions, including my patch, and idle is working properly, then
it should be just fine.
idle seems to work.
I have uploaded python-2.6.7-1
Yaakov,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:57:56AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
I'm not a python-tkinter user. Any hints on how to test?
I successfully ran the two examples from the following:
http://www.pythonware.com/library/tkinter/introduction/
Specifically, the following:
http
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:58:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:51:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 02:29:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there any chance that we could get some traction from the
remaining holdouts for the tcl
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:51:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 02:29:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there any chance that we could get some traction from the remaining
holdouts for the tcl/tk upgrade? I'm primarily concerned about not
breaking python so
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:12:35AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory? I thought of 'cat
/proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Cygwin/something-or-other', but
it seems that there can be multiple
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:23:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
I think a simple batch file in the / (called
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:04:46PM -0500, LMH wrote:
I have a python script and when I try to run it I get an error for no
such module, ImportError: No module named argparse.
[snip]
Any suggestions?
See the following:
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/argparse.html
argparse is not
Yaakov,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 09:47:05PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Still outstanding are:
* python[-tkinter] (Jason Tishler)
* suite3270 [tcl3270] (Peter A. Castro)
In order to provide a seamless transition for users, your packages
must be rebuilt for the new Tcl/Tk per my
Zdzislaw,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:38:57PM -0700, Zdzislaw Meglicki wrote:
There is a problem with running rebase on my system. I go through the
motions:
[snip]
This works fine until:
/usr/bin/cygAfterImage-0.dll: new base = 6ff7, new size = 7
/usr/X11R6/bin/cygXft-1.dll:
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.0.1-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* Change rebaseall to call rebase instead of ./rebase.
* Configure with --sysconfdir=/etc.
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.0.1-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* Change rebaseall to call rebase instead of ./rebase.
* Configure with --sysconfdir=/etc.
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.0.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* rebase and peflags now support operations on 64 bit objects.
* New rebase database
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 4.0.0-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the changes since the previous release:
* rebase and peflags now support operations on 64 bit objects.
* New rebase database
Chuck,
Corinna,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/20/2011 11:24 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
July/early August, any chance you
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a
new release?
Yes. Should the next version be 4.0 or 3.1? I recommend the former,
since there
Corinna,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:57:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 3 09:22, Jason Tishler wrote:
Anyway, I will add this patch to the next Cygwin Python build.
Thanks. Any chance to get this soon? This is a really problematic
limitation.
I'm busy preparing for being AFK
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 01:52:21PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 3 12:29, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 03/08/2011 08:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[snip]
Can you have a look and, perhaps, provide a new python with a bigger
internal FD_SETSIZE? The 256 from
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:08:10AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Another ping.
Where are you, guys? I'm getting concerned.
Sorry, but I was AFK and then catching up...
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784
Corinna,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:03:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna's patch is fine; we're just waiting for Jason's ok -- then I
can add whatever gloss is needed to fixup on mingw/msys. (FYI, I'm
coming up on some travel soon so may be AFK...)
Due to being AFK myself and the size
Corinna,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:36:17PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 21 08:14, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:03:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna's patch is fine; we're just waiting for Jason's ok -- then
I can add whatever gloss is needed to fixup
Phil,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 07:57:31PM +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
Can anyone help me please?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=unable+to+remap
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
--
Problem
Corinna,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:18:35PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jason, this patch still applies cleanly. Is it ok to apply?
Yes, it's OK by me. However, Chuck is the author of peflags.
Chuck,
OK to apply?
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or
Corinna,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Ok to apply?
Yes.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
Chuck,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:06:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
I've committed all of my changes, ...
When I run autoreconf, build-aux is created, but it's empty:
$ autoreconf -fvi
autoreconf-2.65: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf-2.65: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf-2.65:
Corinna,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:33:12PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Any ideas on how to resolve this issue?
It's part of the repository. It should be sufficent to do this:
$ rm -rf build-aux
$ cvs up -d
I forgot about the -d option. I guess my conversion to svn is
complete.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:26:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 21 22:49, JonY wrote:
On 6/21/2011 23:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Here's a simple one.
Avoid error messages due to trying to rebase 64 bit images (as long as
we can't handle them). This has been reported
Corinna,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:34:58AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
it looks like the rebase package is not under CVS control. Would you
mind if we set up a new rebase project in the Cygwin application CVS
repository?
Not at all. What are the mechanics? Who will do the actual CVS
Corinna,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:25:59PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Ok to apply?
I would like to give Chuck a chance to apply the following patch that he
had already submitted (so it applies cleanly):
* autoconfify rebase and imagehelper
* make peflagsall and rebaseall set PATH to
Daniel,
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 06:10:19PM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, JonY wrote:
IMHO rebaseall shouldn't be interacting with mingw dlls at all.
Maybe it can check for dependencies on cygwin1.dll before rebasing?
That's the point. The mingw DLLs need
Yaakov,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:45:33PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Since _locale is already linked against libintl, an easy fix is to
just add ac_cv_func_bind_textdomain_codeset=yes to CYGCONF_ARGS.
When you updated Python to 2.6.6, could you include this as well?
Yes. Thanks for the
Ross,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 06:46:45AM -0500, Ross Hemingway wrote:
[snip]
3/ rebaseall script has a fault on line 91, where if [ ! -w $TmpDir
].This always returns an error, despite the file location being OK
and writable. It's probably a permission issue again. If we comment
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:57:52PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 30 12:56, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 30 01:30, Matthias Andree wrote:
I have provided Jason Tishler with up to date packages for the
current
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:34:04PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 07:30:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I didn't get any moderator email either so far. Maybe the mailing
list server has just some hiccup...
Sorta. The email was blocked because it contained a
New News:
===
I have updated the version of fetchmail to 6.3.18-1. The tarballs
should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The only change between this version and the previous one is the
following:
o update to version 6.3.18
Old News:
===
Fetchmail is a remote mail
New News:
===
I have updated the version of fetchmail to 6.3.18-1. The tarballs
should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The only change between this version and the previous one is the
following:
o update to version 6.3.18
Old News:
===
Fetchmail is a remote mail
1 - 100 of 1168 matches
Mail list logo
