On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, 05:08 Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Jan 3 22:40, NightStrike wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 2, 2022, 15:51 wrote:
> >
> > > While I recognize that ADS is not supported by POSIX, I was wondering
> > > what if any support for ADS might exist within Cy
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022, 15:51 wrote:
> While I recognize that ADS is not supported by POSIX, I was wondering
> what if any support for ADS might exist within Cygwin.
>
> The last time I looked into this was probably more than a decade ago
> but I am seeing (unfortunately) more usage of ADS in the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021, 09:50 Chris Roehrig wrote:
> I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
> synchronize various directories between them.
>
> I'm trying to figure out why my rsync transfers are so slow (<4 MB/s) only
> when the remote endpoint is Cygwin rsync over
Most GNU/Linux distributions (and openssh by default I believe) use
/etc/ssh as the directory to store host keys and default config files.
Cygwin uses /etc, creating by default numerous files in the top level
/etc directory. Is there a technical reason for this? Is this
something that could be
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/5/8 NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com:
How did you install the cross compiler without the dependencies
picking up the headers package?
Well, installing the cross-compiler I only get
the following 4 dependencies
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/5/3 Kai Tietz:
2013/5/3 Jan Nijtmans wrote:
The mingw-w64 cross-compiler in Cygwin64 (x64_64-w64-mingw32)
is currently lacking errno.h,
Absoultely an absurdity. Of course mingw-w64 provides an errno.h
header.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Greetings venerable maintainers,
I have two questions:
- Does anybody know of a simple way to find out which packages in the 32
bit distro are actually noarch' packages? The reason I'm asking is
that I'm looking for a simple way
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de wrote:
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ppl
http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/cloog-ppl
I'm looking at ppl right now. Is there any
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi!
Obviously I can't force you to switch to cygport.
Why not? Honestly, can't you just make it a cygwin policy?
We're still mulling over setting up a build machine. If we have that,
and if you
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Mar 22 19:11, marco atzeri wrote:
latest libstdc++6-4.8-20130319-1
has at least a missing entry point from previous dll
cmake fails with
_ZTVN10_cxxabiv117_class_type_infoE could not be located
Yaakov
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Chris Sutcliffe ir0nh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2013 13:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
You certainly could but that would mean that you'd be releasing untested
software for 64-bit. Is that something that we want to endorse or should
we have some way of
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Cary R. wrote:
From: NightStrike
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Maintainers please weigh in on 64-bit Cygwin
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 17 March 2013 13:45, Christopher
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Yaakov
yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:59:20 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 27 21:29, JonY wrote:
I'm worried that I might break gcc installs if I overlooked something
obvious.
The upload will be overwriting the
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, JonY 10wa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote:
On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote:
I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too
complicated.
Well, if someone else
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
Yes
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
Also, SF.net's FRS is notorious for serving up the wrong file when more
than one file the same name in different directories (e.g. setup.hint).
That has long since been fixed.
You may wish to find another location for temporary posting of
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jon TURNEY jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk wrote:
WFM. Once your _PROTECT_BOOL_MACRO patch for windef.h is accepted, I
can roll an xproto update and this will be GTG.
No problems with ddraw.h status?
There's probably some decruftification which can take place
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:34 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Here's the part from mingw-w64 windef.h:
#ifndef _DEF_WINBOOL_
#define _DEF_WINBOOL_
typedef int WINBOOL;
#pragma push_macro(BOOL)
#undef BOOL
#if !defined(__OBJC__) !defined(__OBJC_BOOL)
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Claude SIMON sc.cygwin@zeusw.org wrote:
Let's consider a Java native component which only calls a 'malloc(1)'. It
doesn't even test the returned value (it is usually not a good idea, but
it doesn't matter here).
This component :
- compiled with g++ under
2010/12/22 Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org:
I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols ...
replace gcc by gcc-3
gcc 4 is now the default on cygwin but the cross compiler is not
supported for that version.
Frédéric
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Andy Koppe andy.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 December 2010 15:12, NightStrike wrote:
2010/12/22 Frédéric Bron:
I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols ...
replace gcc by gcc-3
gcc 4
2010/12/16 Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org:
I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols ...
replace gcc by gcc-3
gcc 4 is now the default on cygwin but the cross compiler is not
supported for that version.
Frédéric
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:41 PM, gviewer marlon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I downloaded a software and tried to compile it on cygwin, I got an
error message:
gcc: The -mno-cygwin flag has been removed; use a mingw-targeted
cross-compiler.
I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
gcc
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:50 PM, gviewer marlon...@gmail.com wrote:
My cygwin may already install that package, then how to modify the flag in
Makefile to compile.
That depends on the makefile. Usually, there's a user-settable
variable called CFLAGS that you can use to customize things. But
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM, gviewer marlon...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for explanation. I checked the Make file, and here it is:
CFLAGS = -O3 -Wimplicit
...
gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols
${BRILL_INCLUDES} -I ${JAVA_HOME}/include/ -I
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:32 AM, David Rothenberger daver...@acm.org wrote:
DESCRIPTION:
Subversion is a version control system designed to be a compelling
successor to CVS.
Please see
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/index.html
for the latest official release of the
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Marco Atzeri marco_atz...@yahoo.it wrote:
and Atlas is so deep unix related, that is better to use
Does this imply that a direct mingw port is not feasible without
extensive effort?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pan ruochen panruoc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Where can I get the source package for the latest setup.exe. I used to
implement a
package filter on version 2.573.2.3. But now the old version of setup
gets errors during
installation. And I still want to
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Gerrit P. Haase gerrit.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 October 2010 22:56, Gerrit P. Haase gerrit.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
Norton Security is running, this may well be a problem, I'll try to
disable this for now.
Yes, much better now, seems to run very much faster
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Andrew Schulman
schulman.and...@epamail.epa.gov wrote:
We just started a Cygwin based forum in an attempt to build the Cygwin users
community support for newer users. We need some forum mods to assist in the
everyday tasks, as well as provide support for our
No. They are not multilib capable, so they only target a single system - Win64.
I am assuming that Jon will be providing toolchains that target Win32
shortly. These will be separate packages.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Angelo Graziosi
angelo.grazi...@alice.it wrote:
For the sake of
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
Well, the 64bit build of w32api provides over 2000 import libraries. The
32bit build has only about 225. Apparently this is because the .def
files that each are generated from are maintained separately, vetted on
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com wrote:
GCC 4.5.x branch and the 4.6.x branch ABI changed for win64, I'm trying
to avoid breaking user's self-built packages, so 4.5.0 and earlier is
out of the question. The current 4.3.4 is too old for mingw-w64.
Going
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:16:54AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:33 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Here's my question, though: given the incompatibilities mentioned,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
On 7/7/2010 5:03 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 09:44:14PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 7 July 2010 18:27, NightStrike wrote:
How's it built now?
With Cygwin gcc and the -mno-cygwin
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
OOTB gcc multilib does not build, nor AFAICS do clear-cut patches exist
to fix it. Others in #mingw-w64 seem to think that multilib isn't worth
the headache, at least not yet. We'll see what I come up with over
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Andy Koppe andy.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
PERHAPS it makes the most sense to provide two single-target compilers
(but most of the interop issues would remain; the only simplification
would be the elimination of any packages that are explicitly
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Andy Koppe andy.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
Is mingw64 already part of a major Linux distribution? Otherwise it
needs five votes from Cygwin maintainers.
Ubuntu, Debian, and Fedora.
Also, are you sure that gcc-4.6 is sufficiently stable for release,
i.e. that there
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
Hmm. So, big picture, we have possibly three different mingw-ish compilers,
and you're currently attempting to shepherd the first one, while being
mindful of future issues related to simultaneous installation of
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
On 6/30/2010 2:53 PM, NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
Hmm. So, big picture, we have possibly three different mingw-ish
compilers,
and you're currently attempting
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:27 PM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Sourceforge doesn't have an FTP, it makes things a bit hard, I'll try to get
an FTP server soon. Basically, its everything under:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/
Is FTP
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:14:42AM +0800, JonY wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to bring mingw-w64 to cygwin. Here are some nits I found
when working with it.
* It sets CC=gcc
While not a major
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 08:54:10AM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote:
I was looking into speeding up stat() performance. More specifically
bash, ls, test, stat performance. I've seen the subject
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/05/2010 21:00, NightStrike wrote:
Ping
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, NightStrike wrote:
When you run setup on a clean system, there's an alert that warns you
if this is your first time installing cygwin
Ping
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
When you run setup on a clean system, there's an alert that warns you
if this is your first time installing cygwin. It says This is the
first time you've installed cygwin 1.7.1. I'm guessing this version
number
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
First off, I do not know if we will ever finish this attempt, but we will
start
and try.
We would like to compile cygwin for 64 bit native operation. Our office is
switching to all 64 bit systems.
Reading:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:13 PM, greenup greenup gree...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an old problem, the last I heard on it was something along the lines
of:
Cygwin's functionality/compatibility/robustness improved in necessary
ways, but performance was required to suffer
From a hearsay
Ok, I'll bite.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:58 PM, farhad Fai farhad200...@aol.co.uk wrote:
Hello Sir/Ma,
My name is farhad Fai from I newly established a art gallery here in Mumbai
India, I saw some beautiful artworks which am interested to buy on the
internet and I contacted them on
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:02:50PM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
Ok, I'll bite.
Your biting is off-topic and responding to spam is just plain stupid.
Stop it.
Hmm.. I didn't realize the reply
When you run setup on a clean system, there's an alert that warns you
if this is your first time installing cygwin. It says This is the
first time you've installed cygwin 1.7.1. I'm guessing this version
number should either say 1.7, or should be otherwise handled
differently.
--
Problem
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, d.sastre.med...@gmail.com wrote:
I was thinking about a ftp server. Users would log in into the jail,
say /chroot/home/proftp/...
Most ftp servers provide this functionality natively.
And this is just for testing/learning purposes and fun.
A great way to
Autoconf is listed twice in the list of installable packages from
cygwin, and described thusly:
autoconf2.1 - Stable version, latest = 2.13-10
autoconf2.5 - Development version, latest =2.65-1
Think it's about time that these are labeled differently? 2.65 is
hardly a development version, and
This guy just redid http://mingw-w64.sf.net/ and it looks GREAT! I
highly recommend his work.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Brian Wilson wil...@ds.net wrote:
Wait a minute... This new web page looks crisp and professional. The
information is easily seen and well laid out. How will anyone
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
So, follow-on question: Can we have one toolchain which targets both
32-bit and 64-bit? It is certainly possible to do that on linux with
a -m32 and -m64 option. Is it possible to do this
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Dave
Korndave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
This release includes the use of shell functions, providing smaller and
faster configure scripts.
Seriously, this should not be underestimated. I tried it for the first time
last night,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Dave
Korndave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com wrote:
configure on cygwin being fast? What
Yes, really. I boggled.
It just keeps getting better...
Anyways you'll get your chance to try it out on the whole /src and /gcc
repositories soon enough, Ralf's
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Tim Prince timothypri...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
rajeevs wrote:
1) I want to create a 64 bit DLL using Cygwin in Windows Serever 2003
64 bit platform.
5) The main thing is that I don't know exactly what should be the
option we have to give under
Where is the actual source code repo for the cygwin dll, as opposed to
any of the other things?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is the actual source code repo for the cygwin dll, as opposed to
any of the other things?
On every page of cygwin.com, as part of the left-hand
navbar, is a link to http://cygwin.com/cvs.html.
--
Eric Blake
I see
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Andrew DeFaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robinson, Paul T (NonStop) wrote:
From: Andrew DeFaria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or how 'bout drum roll
scp!
Probably would not work in my case, the other end of the connection is a
non-Windows box that cares
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NightStrike wrote on 10 September 2008 19:22:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Christopher Faylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:53:45PM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Dave
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, here it is at last. Experimental test release of GCC 4 series
for Cygwin. Please be aware that this is highly experimental; anything
Dave,
I've been building and releasing gcc 4.3 and gcc 4.4 toolchains to
cross
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NightStrike wrote on 10 September 2008 18:54:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, here it is at last. Experimental test release of GCC 4 series
for Cygwin. Please be aware
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Christopher Faylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:53:45PM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, here it is at last. Experimental test release of GCC 4 series
for Cygwin. Please
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Christopher Faylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote on 08 September 2008 22:48:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +, Jay wrote:
You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just fine from the
I figured I would take the liberty of informing anyone from the cygwin
community that might not be on the gcc mailing lists. After a recent
merge of the tuples branch of gcc to the mainline gcc, gcc stopped
being compilable by the 3.4.4 compiler that comes with cygwin. There
are two bugs for
On 6/20/08, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip some unnecessary banter
It's definitely a good suggestion, quite possibly a great suggestion.
However, having made it, it is now just going to sit there in the mail
archive for ever and ever and not ever do anything all by itself.
I
On 4/24/08, Nefastor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Dessent wrote:
Nefastor wrote:
(...) I don't know which of Cygwin's /dev/tty device corresponds to which
serial
port on my PC (that is, I only know the COM port number). I can sort of
guess /dev/tty0 is COM1, but that's a guess,
On 4/5/08, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 4 18:58, Christian Borchert wrote:
I just installed Cygwin with OpenSSH and got it setup on Windows Server
2003.
When I use Putty on a remote machine to connect to the server, the server
starts a bash.exe processes.
When I
On 4/5/08, Andrew DeFaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NightStrike wrote:
Killing putty with Alt-F4 is the same as losing connectivity, or putty
crashing (rare as that is), or any of several other scenarios where there is
abnormal termination. Does bash remain running under any abnormal
On 4/5/08, Andrew DeFaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip lots of useless arguing]
Look, use whatever you want, I don't really care. If you like
cygwin's ssh, wonderful! I don't. Putty provides me the flexibility
I need to access many ssh features on a regular basis for the things
that I do,
On 3/13/08, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NightStrike wrote on 13 March 2008 19:20:
Is cygwin for Win64 native 64-bit, or does it run in the WoW
compatibility layer?
The latter. There's no such thing as cygwin for Win64; the dll itself,
and all the packages, exist only in bog
On 3/19/08, Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't assume that everyone who asks the question
is trying to cheat or bend the rules; I'm a pretty fierce
It is true -- not everyone who wants multiple cygwins installed is a
software packager trying to profit off of cygwin. I have found it
On 3/19/08, Andrew Schulman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* When I want to test installing something myself for which there is
no cygwin package supplied, and I don't want to break anything (nor am
I able to backup the current cygwin root tree)
We have /usr/local or /opt for that. Furthermore
On 3/18/08, Tim Prince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been building gcc 4.3 and 4.4 with mpfr upgraded to 2.3.1, taking the
gmp provided by cygwin. gcc build doesn't complain about mpfr 2.3.0 until
you get to a few testsuite failures, but there seems no point in using
less than 2.3.1.
The
On 3/18/08, Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bobby McNulty wrote:
It built fine. Installed. Got to build mpfr 2.31, and gmp 4.2.2 kept showing
4.2.1.
That's because toplevel configure will find the system gmp header in
/usr/include unless you pass --with-gmp=prefix you built gmp
Is there an approximate timeline for when the gmp and mpfr packages
will be upgraded to the minimum required for compiling gcc? Really, I
guess it's just mpfr that has to be upgraded to 2.3.0., but I think
mpfr 2.3.0 requires gmp 4.2.2.
--
Unsubscribe info:
Is cygwin for Win64 native 64-bit, or does it run in the WoW
compatibility layer?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On 3/4/08, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4 10:12, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
I'd like to access and write to the /proc file system from a java program.
Can somebody steer me in the right direction? I'm starting to feel that
I've exhausted my search options...
/proc is not
There are various libncurses packages, as well as a package named just
ncurses. What is the difference between these?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
cygwin.h doesn't define DWARF2 as an option for debugging formats. This causes
a large array of spurios warnings of the form:
/tmp/ccifRtnm.s:248198: Warning: .stabs: description field '138ef' too big, try
a different debug format
Is it at all possible to include DWARF2 support in future
81 matches
Mail list logo
