On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:19 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 01:44, Kaylem LW via Cygwin wrote:
> >
> > do you have cygwin for vista??
>
> See https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.what.supported
> --
but is possible to go back in time ... and
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 01:44, Kaylem LW via Cygwin wrote:
>
> do you have cygwin for vista??
See https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.what.supported
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygw
do you have cygwin for vista??
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On 05/04/2010 03:33, Denis P wrote:
now works in 1.7.3-1
many thanks!
since i got no answer from my previous email, was it a known bug or i
didnt report the problem the right way or at the right mailling list?
Hello Denis,
Le 2010-04-03 02:12, Denis P a écrit :
There is no trace of
now works in 1.7.3-1
many thanks!
since i got no answer from my previous email, was it a known bug or i
didnt report the problem the right way or at the right mailling list?
Le 2010-04-03 02:12, Denis P a écrit :
Hi i am new to all this stuff, i'm not even sure that i send this to
the right
When trying to connect to a linux sytem from a Vista using xdmcp i get a
strange error.
2009-09-07 12:06:51 XDMCP fatal error: Session failed Session 173248003
failed for display 192.168.0.102:0: cannot open display
As you can see from my network config, I have no adapter on this network
On 07/09/2009 11:37, Mårten Gustafsson wrote:
When trying to connect to a linux sytem from a Vista using xdmcp i get a
strange error.
2009-09-07 12:06:51 XDMCP fatal error: Session failed Session 173248003
failed for display 192.168.0.102:0: cannot open display
As you can see from my network
I forgot to set the Reply-To: correctly
Original Message
Subject: SV: xdmcp cygwin 1.7 vista problem
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:37:23 +0200
From: Mårten Gustafsson
To: 'Jon TURNEY'
Hi Jon
There is a reported interface with this network address. I also have a VmWare
workstation
I forgot to set the Reply-To: correctly
Original Message
Subject: SV: xdmcp cygwin 1.7 vista problem
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:41:52 +0200
From: Mårten Gustafsson
To: 'Jon TURNEY'
-from switch worked fine. Thanks /Mårten
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Jon TURNEY
Wheres home gone ?
I installed fresh Cygwin on Vista Enterprise, but I don't seem to have a
home directory ?
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com
2009/7/29 Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@googlemail.com
Wheres home gone ?
Helps to run Bash !
Sorry for the noise,
Aaron
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
Hi all,
before I reinstall my computer, I'd like to get your advice to what may
cause
a strange behavior in cygwin bash. I have not found any hints in the
archives
so as a last resort perhaps someone reading this knows what is going on.
I run a computer with Vista Ultimate x64 and I have
On 07/18/2009, Ulf Lindgren wrote:
before I reinstall my computer, I'd like to get your advice to what may
cause a strange behavior in cygwin bash. I have not found any hints in the
archives so as a last resort perhaps someone reading this knows what is going
on. I run a computer with Vista
In June of last year, there was a brief thread with the above subject.
I found it in the archive at:
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2008-06/msg00459.html
I am having similar problems getting apache to run on a new laptop that
comes with vista. The only difference is that I am running the
On 01/19/2009, Myron Turner wrote:
So, I assume, cygserver is not working or not working properly. I do have
the CYGWIN environment variable set to server:
$ set | grep server
CYGWIN=server
And you set this before starting any Cygwin processes (including services)?
--
Larry Hall
hello dear cygwinners,
i have used cygwin happily until i got this new machine with vista x64
installed.
i'm perceiving a lot of fork: resource temporarily unavailable
problems.
there seems to be connection with bash which crashes most often, but if
i run for example make of bigger project, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Mojmir Svoboda on 12/18/2008 5:47 AM:
i'm perceiving a lot of fork: resource temporarily unavailable
problems.
// later note: now i got error: bash.exe: *** WFSO timed out after longjmp
i appologize for my ignorance, but i have no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE - redirecting to the list
According to Mojmir Svoboda on 12/18/2008 7:53 AM:
* Eric Blake e...@byu.net [2008-12-18 06:04:15 -0700]:
No need to debug anything; it is a well-known problem, and is solved by
The problem I attached in July still didn't be solved.
I checked the Big List of Dodgy Apps here:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2007-q3/msg00174.html
And uninstalled everything I have. Still got the errors.
I want to report the problem to Cygwin, but after I read here
Problem reports:
://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Thanks a lot! You're solution is working perfectly.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/irssi-on-cygwin-on-vista-64bit-crashes-with-0x0135-in-cygperl5_8.dll-tp18440382p18516089.html
Sent from
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:27:41PM -0700, TB2 wrote:
Thanks a lot! You're solution is working perfectly.
FYI, there is now a new version of irssi so this should no longer be an
issue.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
Hi Reini,
On Jul 14 12:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 14 02:33, TB2 wrote:
Hi,
It's a fresh vista ultimate 64bit install and I installed cygwin with
standard options + irssi, screen and rxvt. Everything working; rxvt and even
screen, but irssi crashes instantly upon execution,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:18:29PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Reini,
On Jul 14 12:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 14 02:33, TB2 wrote:
Hi,
It's a fresh vista ultimate 64bit install and I installed cygwin with
standard options + irssi, screen and rxvt. Everything working;
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
On Jul 14 12:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 14 02:33, TB2 wrote:
Hi,
It's a fresh vista ultimate 64bit install and I installed cygwin with
standard options + irssi, screen and rxvt. Everything working; rxvt and even
screen, but irssi crashes instantly upon
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:22:13PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
No, we are not binary ABI compatible with 5.8 anymore.
We just can support only the non-XS packages.
But we cannot support packages linking to the old 5.8 dll and not packages
using old 5.8 XS code.
This is an issue for the package
code is 0x0135
File: cygperl5_8.dll
I can't find anything remotely connected to this error on google so I'm
pretty clueless about what to do.
Any ideas how to fix this? Anyone having this problem?
I'd be glad if someone who's using vista 64bit and cygwin could try to
install and run irssi
On Jul 14 02:33, TB2 wrote:
Hi,
It's a fresh vista ultimate 64bit install and I installed cygwin with
standard options + irssi, screen and rxvt. Everything working; rxvt and even
screen, but irssi crashes instantly upon execution, no matter if I use cmd
or rxvt as the shell, or if I start
Hi, all:
I don't sure if Cygwin can run under Vista 64 bit. I can't find the information
on Cygwin.com.
I installed it under my Vista 64bit. But when I tried to build a .dll file
under bash, got following errors:
3 main collect2 48460 c:\cygwin\lib\gcc\i686-pc-cygwin\3.4.4\collect2.exe:***
yu xuesheng wrote:
Hi, all:
I don't sure if Cygwin can run under Vista 64 bit. I can't find the
information on Cygwin.com.
From the main Cygwin project page:
The Cygwin DLL currently works with all recent, commercially released x86
32 bit and 64 bit versions of Windows, with the
I'm running Cygwin on Vista (32-bit Business) with reasonably good
success. (why vista? = long, somewhat painful, story)
cygcheck version 1.90.4.1
System Checker for Cygwin
Cygwin Package Information
Package VersionStatus
apache2 2.2.6-1OK
On Jun 23 01:04, Etchelecu, Steve J wrote:
Under Vista I find that I'm having trouble with the whole cygserver
thing. In order to run cygserver-config I need to 'Run As
Administrator' and to start the cygserver service I need to 'Run As
Administrator' but then when I start apache2 it can't
* Prakashmp (Wed, 28 May 2008 21:06:01 -0700 (PDT))
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* Prakashmp (Wed, 28 May 2008 03:45:51 -0700 (PDT))
I have installed Cygwin (DLL 1.5.25.11) on Vista Business edition (64
bit).
I am trying to do ftp using command as for one of my application, this is
for which I am getting same error.
Requirement:
# I want to ftp from other system to vista box.
I have admin previleges to the system.
Could anyone let me know how this issue can be resolved?
Thanks,
Prakash
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ftp-issue-on-Cygwin-under-Vista
* Prakashmp (Wed, 28 May 2008 03:45:51 -0700 (PDT))
I have installed Cygwin (DLL 1.5.25.11) on Vista Business edition (64 bit).
I am trying to do ftp using command as for one of my application, this is
requirement. I am getting error like:
ftp: connection: Connection refused
and no other
when I say which ftp, it says similar to the one you mentioned.
$ which ftp
/usr/bin/ftp
But How does this solves the issue?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ftp-issue-on-Cygwin-under-Vista-tp17509897p17527236.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive
://cygwin.com/faq/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-emacs-Vista%3A-linked-dll-data-write-copy-failed-tp15172849p16967658.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-emacs-Vista%3A-linked-dll-data-write-copy-failed-tp15172849p16967686.html
Sent from
Beware!!
I have noticed that Cygwin and the new Vista command 'mklink' do not
co-exist very happily.
If you create a Vista symlink using mklink and then try to delete/remove it
using 'rm', the target is deleted and not the symlink!
Best Regards
A. J. Paul Carew
--
Close Reach Communications
I'm becoming an idiot. Every day I understand less:
bash-3.2$ file AWTPlayer.java
AWTPlayer.java: ASCII Java program text
bash-3.2$ unix2dos.exe AWTPlayer.java
AWTPlayer.java:
unix2dos processing AWTPlayer.java: Permission denied
bash-3.2$ unix2dos.exe AWTPlayer.java AWTPlayer2.java
bash-3.2$
I used the latest setup program and was getting an error when opening xterms
sporatically; if I got the error, the X-window wouldn't be created. If I tried
several times usually one would take.
Shelling or running perldb in emacs would consistently product this problem.
I got a message that
In the past, I have installed cygwin on several Windows XP
systems with no problems.
However, I am encountering severe problems installing
cygwin on vista.
The installation process stalls quietly during the postinstall
phase at
/etc/postinstall/gnuplot.sh
The only way to end the process
Ruprecht Machleidt wrote:
In the past, I have installed cygwin on several Windows XP
systems with no problems.
However, I am encountering severe problems installing
cygwin on vista.
The installation process stalls quietly during the postinstall
phase at
/etc/postinstall/gnuplot.sh
The only
sending that message.
The e-mail archives reveal that problems with cygwin and vista
have been reported before (essentially, the same problems).
However, I couldn't find a message in the archives that would
suggest a fix of the problem.
In case, I missed the crucial message with the fix,
please
check the email archives if you are unsure about the
status of an email message. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/
In any case, I did do some homework before sending that message.
The e-mail archives reveal that problems with cygwin and vista
have been reported before (essentially, the same problems
In the past, I have installed cygwin on several Windows XP
systems with no problems.
However, I am encountering severe problems installing
cygwin on vista.
The installation process stalls quietly during the postinstall
phase. The only way to end the process is to 'cancel'.
No home diretory
In the past, I have installed cygwin on several Windows XP
systems with no problems.
However, I am encountering severe problems installing
cygwin on vista.
The installation process stalls quietly during the postinstall
phase. The only way to end the process is to 'cancel'.
No home diretory
This is to ask if the problems with cygwin on Vista
have by now all been straightened out.
Or to be more concret:
If one wants to install cygwin on Vista,
can one just click on the usual Install or update now
and get the right stuff that is also compatible with Vista?
Or does one have to download
Ruprecht Machleidt wrote:
This is to ask if the problems with cygwin on Vista
have by now all been straightened out.
Or to be more concret:
If one wants to install cygwin on Vista,
can one just click on the usual Install or update now
and get the right stuff that is also compatible with Vista
aside). I have
installed Cygwin on Vista on 4 different laptops that approximate your
setup, and the /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh script should take no longer
than 2 minutes to run.
On that note, there are some serious issues with installing Cygwin on Vista.
There are 3 scripts that hang
Larry All:
I installed the same Cygin SW release on my 2 GHZ single core
Win 2000 desk top machine and it completed the Running part of the
installation in a timely manor.
Is there a reason that it would take (possible hours) to complete
on a new dual core 1.8 GHZ Laptop with Windows
Thomas Dineen wrote:
Larry All:
I installed the same Cygin SW release on my 2 GHZ single core
Win 2000 desk top machine and it completed the Running part of the
installation in a timely manor.
Is there a reason that it would take (possible hours) to complete
on a new dual core 1.8 GHZ
Gentle People:
I have found a bug actually a hang condition when I attempt to
run Setup for Cygwin on my Toshiba Satellite with MS Vista
with all current MS Windows updates installed.
The hang occurs in the Running section of Setup on the file:
/etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh
From what I
Thomas Dineen wrote:
Gentle People:
I have found a bug actually a hang condition when I attempt to
run Setup for Cygwin on my Toshiba Satellite with MS Vista
with all current MS Windows updates installed.
The hang occurs in the Running section of Setup on the file:
Hello,
I have used the 'setup.exe' to install the latest cygwin without any problem
on my Vista Ultimate which is running on a Macbook Pro via Boot Camp beta. I
believe that you need to login as Vista administrator. Good luck!
Long
--
Unsubscribe info:
Gentle People:
I have found a bug actually a hang condition when I attempt to
run Setup for Cygwin on my Toshiba Satellite with MS Vista
with all current MS Windows updates installed.
The hang occurs in the Running section of Setup on the file:
/etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh
From what I
Hello,
I have been trying to run Cygwin on my new laptop
running Vista Home
Premium and I am having a really tough time. Initially,
the command
startx was not recognised so I downloaded all the x11
packages. I
then ran cygwin again without rebooting, the startx
command was then
On 20 August 2007 22:53, Aaron Gray wrote:
Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ?
Okay I am kicking myself now many hours wasted it was because I used a
Windows program WinRAR to unpack my work rather than using tar !!!
It was a permissions problem afterall.
Very sorry for poluting
On 20 August 2007 22:53, Aaron Gray wrote:
Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ?
Okay I am kicking myself now many hours wasted it was because I used a
Windows program WinRAR to unpack my work rather than using tar !!!
It was a permissions problem afterall.
Very sorry for poluting your
Dave Korn wrote:
[...] toiletless[*] in this matter.
[...]
[*] - Y'know. Nothing to go on.
snicker
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote:
Now I having a problem with libcpp getting the error :-
checking dependancy style of gcc...
/usr/src/gcc-4.2.0/libcpp/configure: line 2887: ./depcomp: premission
denied.
AFACT this actually looks like a Vista problem.
I replaced line 2875 with
On 20 August 2007 15:49, Aaron Gray wrote:
On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote:
Now I having a problem with libcpp getting the error :-
checking dependancy style of gcc...
/usr/src/gcc-4.2.0/libcpp/configure: line 2887: ./depcomp: premission
denied.
AFACT this actually looks
On Aug 20 16:20, Dave Korn wrote:
On 20 August 2007 15:49, Aaron Gray wrote:
On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote:
AFACT this actually looks like a Vista problem.
[...]
Hm, that sounds like a file that you have write but not delete permissions
to.
Can someone look into this
are the Cygwin
instillation and Vista.
Note: Not all
problems on Vista are Vista's (or, FWIW, Cygwin's) fault. See, for
example http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PEBCAK for one possible explanation
of the problem.
Nice reply :)
Does look like a case of PEBCAK.
Unmodified GCC 4.2.0 compiles okay, but when
posix,
have always been pretty wide open: AYS they haven't been tightened up for
Vista?
Works fine on XP. The only things that are diferent are the Cygwin
instillation and Vista.
Heh, so that's a bit like saying The only things that are different are
everything, apart from the gcc source code
,
have always been pretty wide open: AYS they haven't been tightened up for
Vista?
Works fine on XP. The only things that are diferent are the Cygwin
instillation and Vista.
Heh, so that's a bit like saying The only things that are different are
everything, apart from the gcc source code
On 20 August 2007 18:16, Aaron Gray wrote:
Unmodified GCC 4.2.0 compiles okay, but when modified cracks appear, only
on Vista though, XP is okay. So must be something to do with permissions.
So, what tool did you use to 'modify' it?
A Windows text editor called Zeus.
I have been
On 20 August 2007 18:16, Aaron Gray wrote:
Unmodified GCC 4.2.0 compiles okay, but when modified cracks appear,
only
on Vista though, XP is okay. So must be something to do with
permissions.
So, what tool did you use to 'modify' it?
A Windows text editor called Zeus.
I have been altering
On 20 August 2007 19:13, Aaron Gray wrote:
On 20 August 2007 18:16, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hopefully I shall get to the bottom of it if I perservere, but any help or
suggestions are welcome.
Well, why don't you actually *look* at those perms, instead of asking people
who have no access to
Aaron Gray wrote:
A Windows text editor called Zeus.
That's it. I bet the problem disappears if you use a Cygwin text editor
such as vim.
When a native Windows app creates a file, it usually does not do
anything special with the ACL, so it gets whatever the default
inheritable permissions of
Aaron Gray wrote:
A Windows text editor called Zeus.
That's it. I bet the problem disappears if you use a Cygwin text editor
such as vim.
When a native Windows app creates a file, it usually does not do
anything special with the ACL, so it gets whatever the default
inheritable permissions
Okay I printed out '$am_depcomp' which was effectivly
'gcc4.2.0/libcpp/../depcomp' and put an 'exit' at (effective) line 2888 and
the file gcc4.2.0/depcomp does not seem to exist.
Very strange as I found 'depcomp' before previously and its printing 'line:
2888: ./depcomp: permisssion denied'
Ignore the previous post depcomp is under src/gcc-4.2.0 not build/gcc-4.2.0
!
Sorry to mess you about. I'll get some ACL results now ...
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
Okay getfacl is reporting 'user::---' rather than 'user::rwx' for depcomp on
my patched version of GCC.
This leads to two questions ...
How do I modify this to be correct ?
Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ?
Thanks for bearing with me.
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info:
Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ?
Okay I am kicking myself now many hours wasted it was because I used a
Windows program WinRAR to unpack my work rather than using tar !!!
It was a permissions problem afterall.
Very sorry for poluting your mailing list.
Regards,
Aaron
--
On building GCC on Vista I am getting a permissions error on building 'intl'
with 'libintl.h' being unaccessable.
Any insights or help welcomed,
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote:
On building GCC on Vista I am getting a permissions error on building 'intl'
with 'libintl.h' being unaccessable.
Any insights or help welcomed,
Welcome to the Cywin Package List:
http://cygwin.com/packages/
Do you have libintl.h installed?
On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote:
On building GCC on Vista I am getting a permissions error on building
'intl'
with 'libintl.h' being unaccessable.
Any insights or help welcomed,
Welcome to the Cywin Package List:
http://cygwin.com/packages/
Do you have libintl.h installed?
This is probably a well asked question but whats going on with Cygwin on
Vista ?
I have tried rebuilding GCC 4.2.0 which I had built a month ago successfully
but now is failing on 'cp' commands.
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports
This is probably a well asked question but whats going on with Cygwin on
Vista ?
I have tried rebuilding GCC 4.2.0 which I had built a month ago
successfully but now is failing on 'cp' commands.
Seems okay now, just a glitch ?
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:30:45PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
This is probably a well asked question but whats going on with Cygwin
on Vista ?
I have tried rebuilding GCC 4.2.0 which I had built a month ago
successfully but now is failing on 'cp' commands.
Seems okay now, just a glitch ?
We reset
the development tools on Vista I get the following error
message when opening the bash shell of the SDK:
However, yes, Cygwin works on Vista. If you want answers about how to
get Altera working, however, don't ask us. Ask Altera.
cgf
Yeah Cygwin works fine on Vista, it's just Windows that doesn't work
:
However, yes, Cygwin works on Vista. If you want answers about how to
get Altera working, however, don't ask us. Ask Altera.
cgf
Yeah Cygwin works fine on Vista, it's just Windows that doesn't work well on
Vista ... sigh
--
zzapper
Success for Techies
http://SuccessTheory.com/tips
get the following error
message when opening the bash shell of the SDK:
However, yes, Cygwin works on Vista. If you want answers about how to
get Altera working, however, don't ask us. Ask Altera.
cgf
Yeah Cygwin works fine on Vista, it's just Windows that doesn't work
well on
Vista
3948, Win32 error 87
We don't support Altera or any other 3PP http://cygwin.com/acronyms#3PP here.
However, yes, Cygwin works on Vista. If you want answers about how to get
Altera working, however, don't ask us. Ask Altera.
Duh?
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe
On Feb 18 11:58, Benoit Miller wrote:
A while ago there was a discussion (in the Vista coreutils thread)
that suggested adding an install.exe.manifest file to solve the UAC
issues with Vista.
From a Cygwin 1.5.24-2 install, two more manifest files are needed: one
for install-info.exe
A while ago there was a discussion (in the Vista coreutils thread)
that suggested adding an install.exe.manifest file to solve the UAC
issues with Vista.
From a Cygwin 1.5.24-2 install, two more manifest files are needed: one
for install-info.exe and (more importantly) one for patch.exe
On Dec 9 21:22, Mike Knope wrote:
OK. I've looked thru the archives and I've even tried installing as the
true Administrator and all I get are errors either saying that sed.exe
stopped working when I try to run setup on Vista, or I get
install-info.exe stopped working if I try to
Well, I must be dumb cuz I tried everything and it still fails to
complete the install. Always fails with sed.exe has stopped working.
I guess I'll just wait a while and see if something shows up in the
future. It just will not install for me.
Thanks,
Mike
On Dec 9 21:22, Mike Knope
OK. I've looked thru the archives and I've even tried installing as the
true Administrator and all I get are errors either saying that sed.exe
stopped working when I try to run setup on Vista, or I get
install-info.exe stopped working if I try to reinstall after the sed
fail. I even tried
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Prince wrote:
I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such
software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will
consider Vista broken.
FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64.
(in fact, I used it for a
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such
software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will
consider Vista broken.
FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64.
(in fact, I used it for a month now)
Yes,
On Sep 20 05:33, Tim Prince wrote:
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such
software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will
consider Vista broken.
FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64.
(in
I can't get bash to run, using the standard installation. I tried all
the compatibility modes, with and without the addition of syswow64 to
the shortcut. Failure mode is different in the win9x modes from the
others. Any more suggestions?
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Sep 18 13:27, Tim Prince wrote:
I can't get bash to run, using the standard installation. I tried all
the compatibility modes, with and without the addition of syswow64 to
the shortcut. Failure mode is different in the win9x modes from the
others. Any more suggestions?
See
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 18 13:27, Tim Prince wrote:
I can't get bash to run, using the standard installation. I tried all
the compatibility modes, with and without the addition of syswow64 to
the shortcut. Failure mode is different in the win9x modes from the
others. Any more
95 matches
Mail list logo
