Re: OpenGL-1.1.0 compile problem in cygwin-1.7

2008-12-09 Thread Brian Dessent
Phan, Linh H wrote: gluTessCallback(tobj, (GLenum)GLU_BEGIN, (void (*)())glBegin); gluTessCallback(tobj, (GLenum)GLU_END, glEnd); gluTessCallback(tobj, (GLenum)GLU_VERTEX, (void (*)())glVertex2fv); } And that fixed it for glEnd, but I don't know how to fix the glBegin and

Re: Latest autoconf (2.63): problem generating libtool script when reconfiguring GCC (maybe others).

2008-12-09 Thread Brian Dessent
Eric Blake wrote: Oops. m4_append was undocumented in 2.60, then changed semantics in autoconf 2.62. Newer libtool works around the semantic change by using lt_append, not m4_append: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libtool.git;a=commitdiff;h=5b560bd But you still have the

Re: Latest autoconf (2.63): problem generating libtool script when reconfiguring GCC (maybe others).

2008-12-09 Thread Brian Dessent
Charles Wilson wrote: and thus make it easier to move officially to 2.6x at some point in the future, are still in work. BTW, Ralf expressed a tentative plan to work on this after 4.4 has branched and mainline returns to stage 1: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-12/msg00048.html. Brian --

Re: OpenGL-1.1.0 compile problem in cygwin-1.7

2008-12-08 Thread Brian Dessent
Phan, Linh H wrote: /usr/include/sys/_types.h:63:20: error: stddef.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/lib/../include/w32api/glui.h:29, from example1.cpp:20: /usr/include/stdio.h:37:20: error: stdarg.h: No such file or directory In file included from

Re: OpenGL-1.1.0 compile problem in cygwin-1.7

2008-12-08 Thread Brian Dessent
Phan, Linh H wrote: $ /usr/bin/g++ -g -c -I/usr/include/opengl test.c++ x.c++: In function `void test()': x.c++:7: error: invalid conversion from `void (*)()' to `void (*)()' x.c++:7: error: initializing argument 3 of `void gluTessCallback(GLUtesselator*, GLenum, void (*)())' x.c++:8:

Re: Problems with remote programs using ncurses (aptitude)

2008-12-08 Thread Brian Dessent
SO wrote: I have problems opening remote programs using ncurses library. Aptitude for example. Menus and other interface components are just garbage on my term on windows vista. Is there a solution for that? The answer will depend on what terminal you're using. But first a summary of the

Re: all files seems to be owned by the actual user

2008-12-07 Thread Brian Dessent
Matthias Meyer wrote: I've tried also ntsec, binmode and . Why are you doing these things? Are you following somebody's guide? Please tell them that they are spreading useless information if that is the case. ntsec is the default. binmode is the default and is irrelevant for files anyway.

Re: gdb is sooooo slow - is that normal?

2008-12-07 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: That shows 5 stages out of maybe 20 or so that seem to run before my own app appears on screen. The problem is that each of those stages can take anywhere from about 6 seconds up to 15 seconds (taking longer, the more breakpoints I've set). Therefore after starting the

Re: all files seems to be owned by the actual user

2008-12-07 Thread Brian Dessent
Matthias Meyer wrote: Please can you say what I have to do? Should rsync -a --super /cygdrive/c/data /cygdrive/c/backup do the job what I want? Yes, that ought to work. Does it? Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: rsync restore the file owner but rsyncd do it not

2008-12-07 Thread Brian Dessent
Matthias Meyer wrote: My first questions: What the reason for not copying the attributes HS? rsync is a POSIX program. It sees everything in terms of POSIX. That means it sees a file mode, such as 0644, 0755, etc. It reads a mode on the source and sets that same mode on the dest, that is

Re: cygport and gpg

2008-12-06 Thread Brian Dessent
Ken Brown wrote: I don't use gpg, but a look at the documentation suggests that I'm supposed to import a public key. Should the key have been included with the source package? I didn't see it there. No, keys are available from keyservers. You ought to be able to import it automatically

Re: all files seems to be owned by the actual user

2008-12-06 Thread Brian Dessent
Matthias Meyer wrote: Another strangely effect is that ls -alnh / lists all files as owned by the actual user. If I do that as another user the files will also be listet as owned by him, the user who runs the ls. What is the reason for that? You instructed Cygwin to not read or write any

Re: Cygwin/Python question: NumPy

2008-12-05 Thread Brian Dessent
Gustavo Seabra wrote: I have installed all the python packages available from setup.exe, which includes NumPy. However, I am trying to install another program Are you sure about that? There's only Numeric available through setup, not NumPy. Maybe you are thinking of Cygwin Ports, which does

Re: CYGWIN=ntsec, cp -a, and NT acls

2008-12-05 Thread Brian Dessent
Rob Walker wrote: # make it read-only the windows way attrib +R ${FILE} Note that the +R attribute (and attributes in general) has nothing to do with ACLs or security, it's a completely different concept. FAT for instance supports R/H/S/A attributes but otherwise has a total lack of any form

Re: Setup.exe: all files in one common directory? (not per-server)

2008-12-05 Thread Brian Dessent
sowiso wrote: Could it also be possible to have the release directory used together with _all_ mirrors? You should be able to just specify as the Local Package Dir the parent dir and it should find and union the contents of all the subdirs. Brian -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: Setup.exe: all files in one common directory? (not per-server)

2008-12-05 Thread Brian Dessent
sowiso wrote: and so on. __I cannot do anything about this.__ You see? If I do want to avoid this, I must always use the same mirror. And what if it's unaccessible due to a server downtime? Yes, when downloading it will create the files under the mirror's filename. That's by design because

Re: CYGWIN=ntsec, cp -a, and NT acls

2008-12-05 Thread Brian Dessent
Rob Walker wrote: [RGW] Hm, looks simple... Why isn't this part of cp -a ? You have to understand the history of things. In the classic unix world, a file has an owner, a group, a mode, and several timestamps. From the standpoint of what cp -a can manipulate portably, that's basically it.

Re: Setup.exe: all files in one common directory? (not per-server)

2008-12-05 Thread Brian Dessent
sowiso wrote: Yes, and that's another bad point about it! Different setup.ini files! What's the idea? A single setup.ini file describes a particular view of the state of the distro at a given point in time for a given site. Mirrors are inherently loosely synchronized on the order of hours,

Re: Trouble differentiating Backspace from Control-Backspace in rxvt-20050409-9

2008-12-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Jonathon Merz wrote: I recently upgraded from rxvt-20050409-7 to rxvt-20050409-9 and have stopped getting different output for Backspace and Control-Backspace. In rxvt-20050409-7, I get ^? for Backspace and ^H for Control-Backspace. In rxvt-20050409-9, I get ^H for both. I've tried

Re: Socket programming with Cygwin

2008-12-03 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: In every case, the programs fail when the client attempts to connect to the server. This would be a typical line:- status = ::connect ( m_sock, ( sockaddr * ) addr, sizeof ( addr ) ); 'status' receives -1 and if I check the error it's invariably something like

Re: Finally managed to create a jailed SFTP server, but how secure?

2008-12-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Julio Emanuel wrote: 4) Only commands compiled for Cygwin, AND accessing the file system exclusively through the Cygwin POSIX interfaces can (and will) obey the chroot settings; This is not valid reasoning, as Eric Blake already pointed out you can still access files outside of a chroot even

Re: Finally managed to create a jailed SFTP server, but how secure?

2008-12-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Julio Emanuel wrote: Aha! So this is the tiny bit that was missing! What you are saying is that the Cygwin DLL does not honor the chroot if the path is in WIN32 format? But why is that? It shouldn't honor the chroot all the time? I mean, this sounds like the right thing to do(tm), if Cygwin

Re: Socket programming with Cygwin

2008-12-03 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: Forgive me - but as someone who's very new to socket programming, I'm confused about why the program worked when I built it under Linux. Is it because something would have converted localhost to an IP address (is this the lookup stuff that you referred to?) and where can I

Re: Finally managed to create a jailed SFTP server, but how secure?

2008-12-03 Thread Brian Dessent
TheO wrote: identifying what filenames are reserved by Win32, this is what I've got (please complete it if I am missing something): No, we mean get c:/dir/file or get c:\dir\file. (or put //hostname/share/file, shudder.) Brian -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: Finally managed to create a jailed SFTP server, but how secure?

2008-12-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Eric Blake wrote: That's with /. What about with \? The cygwin dll sometimes treats the two separators differently, where using \ is more likely to bypass cygwin checks. Don't forget the other variants, like \\.\c:\foo\bar \\./c:/foo/bar \??\c:\foo\bar \??/c:\foo\bar \??/c:/foo/bar Brian

Re: watch option processing broken

2008-12-02 Thread Brian Dessent
Daniel B. wrote: Similarly, if you try watch --interval=xx echo, you get no report that xx is not a valid number, or is not a valid interval value. It seems that option-parsing messages aren't getting printed out. I get the usage summary displayed as a result of that command,

Re: readline build questions

2008-11-27 Thread Brian Dessent
Eric Blake wrote: I'm trying to resolve a bash bug caused by relying on auto-import rather than __declspec(dllimport): http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-11/msg00340.html There is another potential workaround that doesn't involve modifying the readline headers. If there are only a few places

Re: Building for cygwin/win32 under Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Brian Dessent
Rich Simonis wrote: I don't know if I'm missing another include directive or a compiler switch, or just if my assumption that I can use the Linux g++ to cross-compile to Win32 is wrong. Your assumption is wrong. You need to build an actual cross-compiler (and cross-assembler,

Re: [OT] Re: Opening a (cygwin-ised) DLL

2008-11-24 Thread Brian Dessent
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: John Emmas wrote: Oops, I meant to ask another question (almost a variation on the same theme). Does Cygwin itself (or more correctly, its linker) link automatically to any of the standard Windows libs (such as kernel32.lib, user32.lib etc). kernel32 is

Re: help with bash/readline dll interaction bug

2008-11-19 Thread Brian Dessent
Eric Blake wrote: Is there some slick way to make bash grab a function pointer that can see through the trampoline and see that bash's trampoline version of rl_tab_insert is indeed the same function as readline's local rl_tab_insert? Sure, arrange for there to be a __declspec(dllimport) on

Re: XOrg 7.2 issue with -multiwindow

2008-11-16 Thread Brian Dessent
Uh Huh wrote: Yes, I read that more than once, and it appeared to contain nothing pertinent, other than the fact that compositing doesn't work with -multiwindow, and that there are plans to fix that later. Fine, Did you miss the following part? * The WindowsWM extension is currently

Re: libXaw8 replacement

2008-11-14 Thread Brian Dessent
Ken Brown wrote: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: cannot find -lresolv I assume this means that I have to install a package that contains the resolv library, but I couldn't find one by searching the cygwin package list. Can someone tell me what package

Re: Cannot compile UUID module

2008-11-11 Thread Brian Dessent
Alexander Stadler wrote: So my next question is: Do you know what parameters are needed so that the Makefile will be created with the right settings (without manually executing g++ after the crashed first make)? Because creating it with: perl Makefile.PL LIBS=-L/usr/lib/e2fsprogs I would

Re: Cannot compile UUID module

2008-11-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Alexander Stadler wrote: gcc -c -DPERL_USE_SAFE_PUTENV -U__STRICT_ANSI__ -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/ usr/local/include -DUSEIMPORTLIB -O3 -DVERSION=\0.02\ -DXS_VERSION=\0.02\ -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.10/i686-cygwin/CORE UUID.c rm -f blib/arch/auto/UUID/UUID.dll g++ --shared

Re: [ITA] X.Org X11R7.4

2008-11-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: libXfixes3 and libXfixes-devel have category: X11 and external-source: libXfixes. AFAIK (and please correct me if I'm wrong) upset and/or setup require a binary libXfixes package to go alongside the source package, so they are empty. I don't want the empty

Re: [ITA] X.Org X11R7.4

2008-11-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Dessent wrote: I don't like the precedent this creates -- it's bad UI. The user is supposed to be able to get the source by just putting an X in the Src box of the normal package. But with this scheme they can no longer do that, they have to know to first show hidden packages

Re: [ITA] X.Org X11R7.4

2008-11-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: Because this means jumping through a lot more hoops, believe me. This method (where there's no binary package corresponding to the source package) has precedence in Debian as well. If it really does save you time than I remove my objection. Can I just request

Re: Call undocumented NTDLL functions with Cygwin/gcc?

2008-11-01 Thread Brian Dessent
David Arnstein wrote: #include w32api/ddk/ntapi.h You don't need the w32api prefix, that is part of the built-in search path -- otherwise, #include windows.h would not work. You also need to link with -lntdll. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: gcc-4.3 compatibility and cygwin-1.7 policy questions [Was:: Re: SECURITY vulnerabilities update 2007-Sep-25]

2008-10-29 Thread Brian Dessent
Charles Wilson wrote: Well, if we continue -- at present -- with static libstdc++, then would we need to continue -- at present -- with static libgcc even for C libraries? For example: cygncurses-N.dll : if this C library is compiled using -shared-libgcc then cygncurses++-N.dll :

Re: gcc-4.3 compatibility and cygwin-1.7 policy questions [Was:: Re: SECURITY vulnerabilities update 2007-Sep-25]

2008-10-29 Thread Brian Dessent
Charles Wilson wrote: Err...but that's a good description of cygwin-1.7, as well. Nobody (as far as I am aware) is suggesting that a test/preview gcc-4.3 package should be used as a regular compiler for cygwin-1.5. I thought so as well, but people are already putting stuff built with gcc4

Re: gcc-4.3 compatibility and cygwin-1.7 policy questions [Was:: Re: SECURITY vulnerabilities update 2007-Sep-25]

2008-10-28 Thread Brian Dessent
Charles Wilson wrote: Or is all the worry about about unwinding a C++ only issue? (And of As far as I can tell, it is. Note that gcc doesn't[1] emit any unwind tables for C language input, even on platforms like Linux that have been DW2 for a long time. So if you somehow managed to get

Re: bash: Word splitting but when?

2008-10-22 Thread Brian Dessent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the ouput of $(echo '1 2 3 x') should go through word splitting and x Word splitting does not occur in the right-hand side of an assignment. From the manual: A variable may be assigned to by a statement of the form name=[value] If

Re: [perl] Portably linking to libstdc++

2008-10-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Sisyphus wrote: Of course, the other option on both linux and cygwin is to set *both* $Config{cc} and $Config{ld} to 'g++', and that works fine on linux, but doesn't quite work on cygwin where I still get an undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]':

Re: problem compile with gcc

2008-10-20 Thread Brian Dessent
bjoe wrote: The thing that confusing me is the error came from w32api packages, not from source code. Maybe someone in this list can explain to me about what going on here. You haven't provided enough information, such as what version of w32api you're using. If you aren't using the latest

Re: [perl] Portably linking to libstdc++

2008-10-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Sisyphus wrote: Apparently g++ needs a -shared but ld2 doesn't. (I don't understand that.) And I don't understand what is achieved by: gcc -shared -o Size.dll -Wl,--out-implib=libSize.dll.a -Wl,--export-all-symbols -Wl,--enable-auto-import -Wl,--stack,8388608

Re: Compile time Local Cygwin vs. VMware session on same system

2008-10-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Manning, Sid wrote: I was surprised to see that I could compile much faster under VMware than on Cygwin on the same host. Why is that surprising? Cygwin and VMware work on entirely different principles. Plus your chosen benchmark essentially tests the two slowest aspects of Cygwin, process

Re: [perl] Portably linking to libstdc++

2008-10-19 Thread Brian Dessent
Sisyphus wrote: But on cygwin, there is no '-lstdc++' to be found in $Config{libpth}, so MakeMaker decides to not pass the switch on (which has always been MakeMaker's policy in such cases, afaik). This is a pity - there would be no problem if it *did* the pass switch on, as both gcc and g++

Re: cygwin:g++linker problems

2008-10-17 Thread Brian Dessent
jayshankar nair wrote: The libraries is build with gcc(in cygwin environment). Something to do with flags or packages. Shared libraries have the extension .dll on Windows, not .so. Specifying -lf will find your library if you named it cygf.dll or libf.dll, or if you created an import library

Re: how install ifort in cygwin ???

2008-10-15 Thread Brian Dessent
meyus wrote: I try to install the compilator ifort in cygwin but i have this message : Error etc... don't find 'ldd' ??? It sounds like you're trying to run an install script for Linux binaries. That's never going to work, primarily because there is no 'ldd' command in Cygwin, but even if

Re: Setup 2.573.2.3 says GDB 6.8-2 but installs 6.8-0

2008-10-12 Thread Brian Dessent
Thomas Nilsson wrote: In fact, the package is named gdb-6.8-2.tar.bz2 but when untar'ed displays binaries from 6.8.0. The final number after the dash is the revision number of the packaging, not part of the program's version number, so you should interpret 6.8-2 as the second incarnation of

Re: Linker Search Directories

2008-10-11 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: I'm trying to build a project (using make) that needs python. Python's link library is in /lib/python2.5/config/ but unfortunately, 'make' doesn't seem to be aware of this and fails with the message:- make doesn't know anything about linker search directories. It just

Re: Linker Search Directories

2008-10-11 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: I'm about to build another library called liblo. This library uses various functions with names like getaddrinfo(), freeaddrinfo() etc (all of which are declared in /usr/include/gettaddrinfo.h). On my Linux box, these functions reside in 'libc.a' - but in Cygwin, they're

Re: Circular dependency problem

2008-10-11 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: functions contained in the other one). If I was programming in Microsoft VC++ I'd normally resolve this by exporting the relevant functions. Exporting them (I believe) tells the linker that any unresolved function addresses will be resolved at run time (hence, dynamic

Re: Linker Search Directories

2008-10-11 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: Initially, that's what I thought too Brian. They're part of libc when I compile under Linux but they're not there for Cygwin (and I only installed Cygwin a few weeks ago). I need to link to libgetaddrinfo. In fact I searched libc to find the function names but they aren't

Re: Can anyone help please, with syntax ?

2008-10-10 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: When I got to the 'make install' stage for fftw3 it installed its files under /usr/ whereas my other libraries seem to be installed under /lib/ (e.g. fftw3f.pc was in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ - whereas 'everything_else.pc' seems to be in /lib/pkgconfig/). I'm assuming that this

Re: Cygwin bash

2008-10-06 Thread Brian Dessent
John Emmas wrote: When I double click the 'Cygwin' icon on my Windows desktop, a DOS-like window opens which I'm led to believe is Cygwin's bash terminal. However, with every version of Linux that I've used, the bash terminal had menus allowing me to do certain things like (for example)

Re: gs.exe missing from ghostscript package?

2008-10-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Lee D.Rothstein wrote: 'gs.exe' the Ghostscript interpreter is missing from my configuration. That's because there is not supposed to be a gs.exe. The ghostscript packages use the alternatives facility, which means /usr/bin/gs is a symlink to /etc/alternatives/gs which is a symlink to either

Re: gs.exe missing from ghostscript package?

2008-10-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Lee D. Rothstein wrote: What causes the link to have its extension exposed and become inoperable within Cygwin? Even after I did a complete reinstall. I've seen this before. Does it have to do with the permissions? For shortcut-style links, the .lnk file needs the readonly attribute to be

Re: cygwin-make issue

2008-10-01 Thread Brian Dessent
Clearcase Administrator wrote: Any ideas ? Do I need to upgrade mae ? cygwin ? I want to use the parallel make option of make. You need to re-read the replies that you already received. The error is not from make, it's from the KJxSvc program (whatever that is -- it's not part of Cygwin)

Re: [OT] polite response to rather rude reponse...

2008-09-23 Thread Brian Dessent
Barry Smith at SourceLink wrote: Stop spreading FUD. There is no way a userland app like run.exe can cause a blue screen. Only something running in kernel space -- like windows core code, or certain device drivers -- can ever do that. Then I guess you don't read the cygwin archives,

Re: [OT] polite response to polite response - Brian...

2008-09-23 Thread Brian Dessent
Barry Smith at SourceLink wrote: That doesn't mean that 'run' was at fault. Yet it could have been at fault, or the cygwin memory allocation could be at fault, or Windoze, or the tool that you're RUN-ing. The Cygwin memory allocation most certainly could not be at fault, nor could the tool

Re: I could not still install octave-3.0.2-2 by setup.exe

2008-09-19 Thread Brian Dessent
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: Apparantly cygwin setup went well, however no component of octave-3.0.2-2 is installed. I cannot indicate what is wrong. As it says in the announcement this release is marked Experimental. When using setup.exe you will never have experimental/test versions

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1

2008-09-15 Thread Brian Dessent
Dave Korn wrote: Yep, that's more-or-less what I was referring to by stunk thubbery ;-) With one important difference: the plan you outlined relies on the .exe exporting the function that overrides the copy in the dll. This is somewhat controversial (IMHO) in that it requires adorning the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1

2008-09-12 Thread Brian Dessent
Dave Korn wrote: Why bother? Hence the may. I don't plan to bother for myself, but it depends if I Please don't. gcc isn't special in this regard, it shouldn't receive any special treatment. bash fails without cygintl-8.dll and I don't think anyone is proposing to statically link

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1

2008-09-12 Thread Brian Dessent
Dave Korn wrote: If they were instead resolved to some kind of thunk that could do a lookup at runtime for non-weak versions of the same symbol, we'd be golden. Well, we'd need to make sure the non-weak versions were all declspecced dllexport somehow, but that would do it for us. Well we

Re: New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1

2008-09-11 Thread Brian Dessent
Christopher Faylor wrote: sys_sigabbrev is not in cygwin.def. There are several variables which are not exported via cygwin.def. Hmm... I'm surprised that works. Shouldn't the def file contain the complete list? Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: upgrading to perl-5.8.8-4

2008-09-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Rob wrote: 1. Why is /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl not listed on 5.8.8 ? Because having an unversioned directory in @INC was a mistake that was corrected. 2. why are there duplicate entries for: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8 vendor_perl contains modules that

Re: setup.exe --quiet-mode

2008-09-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Dave Korn wrote: Err, that should never happen, unless you're updating from a several-years-old DLL. The Cygwin DLL is intended to be backwardly compatible, and only rarely have their been ABI breaks. So this aspect of updating doesn't get tested very often. No, that's wrong. It is

Re: setup.exe --quiet-mode

2008-09-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Christopher Faylor wrote: Dave did suggest a possible workaround - delay any postinstall scripts until the next reboot. That's more graceful than requiring the user to re-run setup to catch the failed postinstalls. But it still results in a broken system until the next reboot since those

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1

2008-09-10 Thread Brian Dessent
René Berber wrote: --enable-shared-libgcc --enable-__cxa_atexit --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as Err, that's not good. Cygwin does not support the __cxa_atexit extension, that's only a feature of glibc. This option should not be be used on libcs that don't provide the feature. Brian --

Re: New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1

2008-09-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Christopher Faylor wrote: I haven't tried this with the actual released compiler yet but, assuming it works the same way, mm I wrong or is there something wrong with this compiler? The code it creates seems to be correct (and Cygwin is noticeably smaller) but I'd like to get rid of all of

Re: Is there a limitation I don't know about in setup.exe dependency checking?

2008-09-08 Thread Brian Dessent
Dave Korn wrote: want to trace the dependency? That is to say, is it not allowed/intended to satisfy a missing dependency with a test version? I think it tries to satisfy the dependency with whatever the current global trust level is set to. So if the radio button is on Curr but there's no

Re: MinGW runtime and w32api

2008-09-06 Thread Brian Dessent
Chris Sutcliffe wrote: My question is, should I use the same naming convention for the Cygwin distribution, or keep things the status quo? That doesn't conform to the Cygwin standards, so I'd say no. If you wanted to split up mingw-runtime into separate DLL and header packages, they should be

Re: Difficulty building gcc 4.3.2 under i386-pc-cygwin

2008-09-06 Thread Brian Dessent
Werner Wothke wrote: $ make [ -f stage_final ] || echo stage3 stage_final make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/gcc-4.3.2/Destination' -bubble'. Stop.rule to make target `stage3 make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/gcc-4.3.2/Destination' make: *** [all] Error 2 The overlapped

Re: Cannot change file permission with either chmod or setfacl

2008-09-05 Thread Brian Dessent
Laurent Monnoye wrote: $ chmod 600 foo $ ls -l foo -rw-r--r-- 0 xotrader01 Users 4 Sep 5 18:05 foo You've left out the most relevant detail: what type of filesystem does foo reside on? NTFS, FAT, NFS, Samba? Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: setup.exe --quiet-mode

2008-09-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Rob wrote: until you click the OK button. This clearly is not unattended. It would be better if it could just exit with a specific error code that you could read and take some action (restart). I agree that it's not correct, but I disagree about the conclusion. It should silently schedule

Re: file attributes: cygwin (ls, chmod, chown, chgrp) versus XP

2008-09-03 Thread Brian Dessent
Michael R. Wolf wrote: Where can I get a simple (and current) description of the relationship between Unix file attributes (permissions, user, and group) and how that corresponds to XP file attributes? The Cygwin Users Guide: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html. The section labeled

Re: undefined section `.gnu_debuglink' referenced in expression

2008-09-02 Thread Brian Dessent
carlos wrote: /oss/src/winsup/cygwin/cygwin.sc:143: undefined section `.gnu_debuglink' referenced in expression That's due to a change in binutils that caused it to be more strict. The offending line has been removed from the linker script in HEAD. You can either make the appropriate change

Re: why the strange stack stuf in cygwin?

2008-09-02 Thread Brian Dessent
[ Your messages would be a lot easier to read without the random schizophrenic line length and indentation. ] Jay wrote: I meant implementing __thread in gcc. Starting in 4.3 gcc supports emutls, which enables __thread support on all threaded targets, even when there is no actual TLS

Re: Import library for symbols decl. without dllimport

2008-09-01 Thread Brian Dessent
John E. / TDM wrote: This of course works fine, but it's sub-optimal; I would like for the message not to be displayed at all, and I imagine that the auto-import machinery shouldn't even need to be activated if the import library for the libstdc++ DLL is properly designed. Also, hiding the

Re: [ITA] apr1-1.3.3-1

2008-08-31 Thread Brian Dessent
David Rothenberger wrote: I've changed the package structure as follows: ~ * libapr1: Runtime library and documentation. ~ * libapr1-devel: Development headers and libraries. ~ * apr1: Source package. Something seems wrong here. At the moment for the ABI=1 version we have: @ apr1 sdesc:

Re: rsync in cygwin

2008-08-30 Thread Brian Dessent
Edward Blum wrote: The scenario is: Ubuntu machine running rsnapshot ssh's into remote machine running cygwin 2.6.9 on windows 2003 and uses rsync to backup the files. The error I get is: There is no such version of Cygwin. You are referring to the version of rsync. Reading up is it to do

Re: rsync in cygwin

2008-08-30 Thread Brian Dessent
Edward Blum wrote: Thanks for your swift reply! I see there are release candidates flying about for 1.7 reckon they would be stable enough to try them out or would I be better waiting for a stable release? Is there some where I can find the release cycle? I don't know whether you could call

Re: [Avail for test] login-1.9-8

2008-08-30 Thread Brian Dessent
Gary Wernsing wrote: I added the SetIncreaseQuotaPrivilege to the cyg_server user and that cured the problem. [For those who got here on a search, this is found as Local Computer Policy\ Computer Configuration\ Windows Settings\ Security Settings\ Local Policies\ User Rights

Re: Text Mode and $'\r': command not found error

2008-08-29 Thread Brian Dessent
Clément LABORIE wrote: source ${PROJECT_DIR}/myBash.bash . $'\r': command not found echo ${PROJECT_DIR} E:/project/... When I replace ${PROJECT_DIR} by Unix directory /cygdrive/e/project/..., it works well. What version of bash are you using? Have you read point 6 in

Re: Probably stupid make question

2008-08-28 Thread Brian Dessent
Phil Smith wrote: We're perverting CMake and Cygwin make to use a cross-compiler for z/OS (IBM mainframe). We've beaten it mostly into submission, but are hitting an issue with definitions being passed. Cygwin make seems to be passing them in the format: -Dvarname value rather

Re: man: cygwin 1.7.0 and special filename chars

2008-08-24 Thread Brian Dessent
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: Am I missing something here? Apparently my understanding of FAT is wrong then. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

Re: Updated: perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.300-2

2008-08-24 Thread Brian Dessent
Reini Urban wrote: Sure. Fixing libtool of course. Mixing static and dynamic libs should be possible. I think you're missing the point of why libtool disallows it: not because it won't work in a specific instance, but because it is not portable. There is no fix for the fact that on some

Re: man: cygwin 1.7.0 and special filename chars

2008-08-23 Thread Brian Dessent
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: It's not a case of using the same workaround. With 1.5, the make manifypods target would first build the PODs, then create the manpages, and would fail when trying to create a manpage containing '::' (as it did not use a managed mount). gtk2-perl.cygclass would

Re: New Setup for Cygwin 1.7 on cygwin.com

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Corinna Vinschen wrote: No, it hasn't. I already removed this dependency a week ago. Perhaps something wonky with unionfs is happening then because I clearly see it in the setup-2.ini on sourceware at this moment: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/ftp]$ awk '/^@ base-cygwin$/,/^requires:/' setup-2.ini @

Re: [RFC] 1.7 Packaging: Obsolete packages

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Ok, I'll have a look. Any idea about my other question? How to remove the entire installed.db package DB when the user goes back to the root dir selection dialog so we can reload from another location, should the user choose one? My aborted unfinished attempt at a

Re: New Setup for Cygwin 1.7 on cygwin.com

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Why didn't upset pick up the change? Perhaps it has to do with the design of upset being incremental, i.e. taking the current setup-2.ini as input and applying updates to it rather than generating it from whole each time. It might be confused upon not seeing a requires:

Re: [RFC] 1.7 Packaging: Obsolete packages

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Dessent wrote: - the Replaced-by would have to be transitive in the dependency computation code as well. So if a maintainer renames package OLDNAME to And, as a corollary to that: Replaced-by should accept only a single packagename as predicate, since we have this requirement

Re: [RFC] 1.7 Packaging: Obsolete packages

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Dessent wrote: - the Replaced-by method would not allow a determined user to continue using an old version of a package without upgrading. With the current scheme they can just mark the existing package as Keep (or select a Prev version) which has the effect of blocking the upgrade

Re: [RFC] 1.7 Packaging: Obsolete packages

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Corinna Vinschen wrote: IMHO, the replaced-by would add nothing in terms of less maintainence burden. The old package still has to be tweaked in one way or another. The only extra work without replaced-by is to create empty tar archives for the old packages, which is really simple. As I do

Re: [RFC] 1.7 Packaging: Obsolete packages

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Something's obviously missing... Yes, I led you astray, sorry. That is going to purge absolutely everything that setup knows about packages. In order to get that back it would be necessary to re-parse setup.ini and re-scan the local package directory for its contents

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygutils-1.2.7-1

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Sam Kuper wrote: 1) Was the rename utility removed from cygutils at some point between version 1.2.6-1 and 1.3.2-1, or is my version of cygutils somehow corrupt? 2) If it was removed, why, and is there some other way I can obtain the rename utility under cygwin? (NB. please don't just

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygutils-1.2.7-1

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Dessent wrote: Everything is in the announcements. It was moved out of cygutils in 1.3.0 and into util-linux: And, additionally, next time try: $ cygcheck -p rename.exe Found 3 matches for rename.exe. util-linux/util-linux-2.12r-2 Random collection of Linux utilities util-linux/util

Re: Compiling gcc for cygwin

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
NightStrike wrote: If cygwin ever wants to be able to support newer gcc compilers, something needs to be done in this area. There are several options, That's a quite a misleading statement to make. Everything is fine for a native 4.4 using 3.4 as the bootstrap compiler. That's the whole

Re: man: cygwin 1.7.0 and special filename chars

2008-08-22 Thread Brian Dessent
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: 1) Completely remove the /::/./ substitution in both man and perl for 1.7; 2) Have man look for both '.' and '::'. How about 3) Perpetuate the s/::/./ workaround in Cygport so that manpages continue to be generated with '.'. Rationale: Support for : in filenames

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >