Re: python2 removal

2023-01-16 Thread David Rothenberger via Cygwin-apps
On 1/15/2023 4:52 AM, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: net-snmp-python net-snmp   David Rothenberger [2] Getting net-snmp to compile is currently beyond me, so please consider it orphaned. -- David Rothenberger daver...@acm.org lighthouse, n.: A tall building on

Re: python2 removal

2023-01-16 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps
On 1/16/2023 7:49 AM, Jon Turney wrote: On 15/01/2023 19:31, Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 1/15/2023 7:52 AM, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: bzr-fastimport  python-fastimport  Ken Brown I'm not interested in maintaining these any longer.  If no one else wants to take over, they

Re: python2 removal

2023-01-16 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 15/01/2023 12:52, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: [...] Python 2.7 is the last python2 version, which was sunsetted on January 1, 2020. [...] 2) Looking for packages whose names don't start with 'python', but where the current version installs something into

Re: python2 removal

2023-01-16 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 15/01/2023 19:31, Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 1/15/2023 7:52 AM, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: bzr-fastimport  python-fastimport  Ken Brown I'm not interested in maintaining these any longer.  If no one else wants to take over, they could just be removed from the distro as

Re: [ATTN MAINTAINER] tig

2023-01-16 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 13/01/2023 16:59, Libor Ukropec via Cygwin-apps wrote: Dne 10.01.2023 v 15:04 Jari Aalto via Cygwin-apps napsal(a): Hi, Thanks for the heads up. I've uploaded new version and added the *.cygport in my Github repository of tig for possible new maintainer in the future. The patches deal

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-16 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 15/01/2023 22:49, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: I added this to your packages. NAME=libinih Since the upstream name is just 'inih', the source package should probably be named that also. Can I double-check how that should work from a package naming perspective? I *think* that