On Mar 17 01:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:10:18PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
While libgpg-error is not categorized as unmaintained, the current
maintainer hasn't posted any messages to any cygwin list, nor updated
any of his packages, for over a year and a half.
On 3/17/2010 5:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 17 01:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd say you can consider
this and any other of this series automatically approved.
Exactly. So I refrain from disagreeing. Provided that you keep the
cygwin-pkg-maint file up-to-date as well, Charles.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:10:18PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
While libgpg-error is not categorized as unmaintained, the current
maintainer hasn't posted any messages to any cygwin list, nor updated
any of his packages, for over a year and a half.
Given how little I care about these packages
