Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is available

2016-04-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 5 18:50, Thomas Wolff wrote: > > >>Von: Corinna Vinschen > >>An: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com > >>Cc: Thomas Wolff > >>Datum: 5. April 2016 um 15:55 > >>Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is > >>available > >> >

Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is available

2016-04-05 Thread Thomas Wolff
Von: Corinna Vinschen An: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Cc: Thomas Wolff Datum: 5. April 2016 um 15:55 Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is available Thomas? Any input? Yes, let's fix the patch so. Sorry for the

Re: [PATCH v3] Refactor to avoid nonnull checks on "this" pointer.

2016-04-05 Thread Peter Foley
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > And reverted. This patch is the culprit for the problem reported in > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-04/msg00085.html > > Can you please take another look, Peter? Huh, that's odd... I'll take a look when I