Re: XTrap in X11R7 - your Nov 2008 posting

2010-03-16 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE ! Reply-To: set accordingly. On 2010-03-16 09:22, Rob 613 wrote: I would like to point out that the stated reasoning of removing XTrap is false. For the record, in the X11R7.4 announcement I listed XTrap among the deprecations, stating the reason as:

Re: XTrap in X11R7 - your Nov 2008 posting

2010-03-16 Thread Rob 613
Thank you for replying. My information remains accurate. I am neither refering to any new brokenness in Record - as one of the original developers of it I am refering to its design flaws, as well as the cumbersome nature of needing to use two extensions. This is absolutely not about porting

Re: XTrap in X11R7 - your Nov 2008 posting

2010-03-16 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2010-03-16 14:16, Rob 613 wrote: My information remains accurate. Oh really? How so, exactly? Remember there is a difference between fact and opinion. I am neither refering to any new brokenness in Record - as one of the original developers of it I am refering to its design flaws, as