On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:41:52PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
[...]
> If you're wondering why the "thousands" of people on the list
> aren't "analysing political philosophies" with you, it's because
> YOU'RE FUCKING OFFTOPIC, THEY DON'T WANT TO, and
> they've BLOCKED YOUR ASS.
>
> But for new people
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:29:07PM -0700, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
> John wrote:
> > The reason I asked: updating a few certs at office recently I nuked
> > an older F5 LTM device by installing a 4096 bit key/cert pair - the
> > load on the appliance (Linux based) shot up from less
On 09/03/2016 09:33 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> http://linux.softpedia.com/blog/pc-bsd-operating-system-gets-renamed-to-trueos-follows-a-rolling-release-model-507866.shtml
> https://www.trueos.org/2016/09/01/pc-bsd-evolves-into-trueos/
>
> We are proud to announce that the PC-BSD project has evolved
On 09/03/2016 09:43 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/16/09/01/2031247/new-intel-and-amd-chips-will-only-support-windows-10
> Buried in the announcement of the new Kaby Lake (seventh-generation)
> processors and a rash of incoming notebooks set to use them is the
>
On 09/03/2016 08:28 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/01/world/europe/wikileaks-julian-assange-russia.htm
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3769958/Does-Wikileaks-help-Russia-Information-leaks-Julian-Assange-benefit-Kremlin.html
>
> Now, Mr. Assange and WikiLeaks are
http://linux.softpedia.com/blog/pc-bsd-operating-system-gets-renamed-to-trueos-follows-a-rolling-release-model-507866.shtml
https://www.trueos.org/2016/09/01/pc-bsd-evolves-into-trueos/
We are proud to announce that the PC-BSD project has evolved into
TrueOS: a modern, cutting-edge distribution
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 19:08:51 -0700
"Stephen D. Williams" wrote:
> On 9/3/16 7:07 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 18:08:41 -0700
> > "Stephen D. Williams" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>> http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html
> >>>
> >>> "Crypto
On 09/03/2016 07:34 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
> You are awfully sensitive.
Many of us are feeling rather touchy, I think ;)
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 18:08:41 -0700
"Stephen D. Williams" wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html
> >
> > "Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, anonymous
> > networks, digital pseudonyms, zero knowledge, reputations,
> > information
On 09/03/2016 06:51 AM, John Newman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:03:56AM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> I wouldn't say monastic. Just private. Read old Bill Burroughs' stuff
>> about the Johnson Family.
>
> It's been years since I read Naked Lunch or any of the other cut-up
> novels (although I
On 09/03/2016 05:25 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 04:47:28AM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 09/03/2016 04:03 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Is it possibly less than 'constructive' to dishearten individuals before
> they've even begun?
So maybe do something,
On 9/3/16 5:00 PM, Razer wrote:
> On 09/03/2016 11:41 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> "The Cypherpunks mailing list is a mailing list for discussing
>> cryptography and its effect on society."
> That's why I'm here. I'm on the 'society' end of that dyad.
>
> Just in case it REALLY matters to Juan
John wrote:
> The reason I asked: updating a few certs at office recently I nuked
> an older F5 LTM device by installing a 4096 bit key/cert pair - the
> load on the appliance (Linux based) shot up from less than 1 to about
> 30 and became so excruciatingly slow it was nearly
On 09/03/2016 12:07 PM, Xer0Dynamite wrote:
> Then let me tell you: you didn't come from apes -- nobody did.
Dude! You insulted my family (guerrillas). Let's box MF!
Rr
>>> Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or New World Order, also at
>>> that site. Either the future is made BY us,
On 9/3/16 4:21 PM, John wrote:
>
> On September 3, 2016 3:07:40 PM EDT, Xer0Dynamite
> wrote:
Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or New World Order, also at
that site. Either the future is made BY us, or it is destroyed by
>> US.
Which is it?
>>>
On 9/3/16 2:41 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:14:13 -0700
> "Stephen D. Williams" wrote:
>
>> On 9/3/16 1:30 PM, juan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:41:52 -0400
>>> grarpamp wrote:
>>>
>>>
[1]
"The Cypherpunks mailing list is a mailing list
Speaking within the context of https SSL certs, is there any real value to a
key/cert above 2048 bits?
The reason I asked: updating a few certs at office recently I nuked an older F5
LTM device by installing a 4096 bit key/cert pair - the load on the appliance
(Linux based) shot up from less
On 9/3/16 1:30 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:41:52 -0400
> grarpamp wrote:
>
>
>> [1]
>> "The Cypherpunks mailing list is a mailing list for discussing
>> cryptography and its effect on society."
> incomplete, and you didn't even provide a 'source'
>
>
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:41:52 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> [1]
> "The Cypherpunks mailing list is a mailing list for discussing
> cryptography and its effect on society."
incomplete, and you didn't even provide a 'source'
plus, it's obvious that you haven't read
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:23:48 +0300
Georgi Guninski wrote:
> * social engineering
> * manipulating opinions
> * profiting from the past reputation of the term cypherpunk
> * killing the list
So which one of those categories are you in Georgi? More
than
Oh, and another thing. Just so that we're all clear of the utter
stupidity of it all (even though it's mentioned in the links I gave
prior): the Internet Revolution was co-opted into the same fucking
forces as capitalism in America: GLAM and COMMERCE. Did you notice
that the simple O(N^2)
On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 14:41 -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> "The Cypherpunks mailing list is a mailing list for discussing
> cryptography and its effect on society." There are reasonable relateds
> within the realm of "cypherpunk" to include *its* computing, tools,
> privacy, surveillance, law, news,
On Sep 3, 2016 3:57 PM, "Александр" wrote:
>
> 2016-09-03 21:41 GMT+03:00 grarpamp :
>>
>> Have some respect for that.
>
> grarpamp and alike, with lll the respect - Go, please go, please
go go go fuck yourself at last! You peace of petty
> We are "anarchists" and we do what we want.
Anarchy doesn't scale. What will you expect with billion+ people
without societal structure? Watch World War Z and then Book of Eli to
find out.
The future will probably be some mix of Apocalypse and Enlightenment,
with the latter growing over the
also sprach grarpamp [2016-09-03 20:41 +0200]:
> If you want to longtalk anything other than that to the point
> that the charter would need a whole new section just for you,
> GO FIND OR MAKE YOUR OWN FUCKING LIST FOR THAT.
Thanks for that. It's been appauling…
-m
2016-09-03 21:41 GMT+03:00 grarpamp :
> Have some respect for that.
Yea Yh!
For that shit, real SHIT of pseudo-respect to some imaginable list rules -
grarpamp gives AND demands respect. YEAH!!! Respect!!! But giving some
respect for some things... you know,
Let's get this straight so all you can shut up or put up: There are
two futures: one of an Apocalypse or one of Enlightenment. There are
four prophesies (two religious and two mystical/new age) and two
purely rational arguments why a dramatic and planetary shift MUST and
WILL happen in one form
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/2016 07:31 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:23:48PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>> The list has spooks, paid trolls, other similar whores and
>> possibly crackpots.
>>
>> Some of them post actively, others
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:03:56AM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
> I wouldn't say monastic. Just private. Read old Bill Burroughs' stuff
> about the Johnson Family.
It's been years since I read Naked Lunch or any of the other cut-up
novels (although I did re-read Junkie and Queer recently)...
Still, I
On September 3, 2016 12:14:53 AM EDT, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>AND I vehemently oppose the many and varied evils I witness going on
>all
>around the world and conducted in the name "Australia" (and USA,
>France,
>Germany, etc).
>
You don't seem to have any problem with all
2016-09-03 11:18 GMT+03:00 Zenaan Harkness :
> Signed: Zenaan Harkness
Signed: Alexandr (Александр)
And i have (not less) claims not only to the "leaders" of Tor, but to the
whole tor/cypherpunk/tech community of passive and unprincipled people, who
call themselves Humans
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 10:59:51AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 10:14:29AM +0300, Александр wrote:
> > ... You
> > are just clowns. Hollow people with no principles.
>
> All of us? Including Zenaan?
When someone expresses their heart, their frustration, their anger,
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 03:11:57AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Tor, et al, are well described now.
> Other oppurtunities exist for, or will be made by, those wishing to take them.
> That's what it's all about :)
Fork in JA's name :)
I know: JACAPS, Tor with transparency :)
((
was In-Reply-To:
))
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:12:36AM +0300, Александр wrote:
> “We must always take sides”,
> “Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.
This was and is a great insight for me - thank you Alex!
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 10:14:29AM +0300, Александр wrote:
> ... You
> are just clowns. Hollow people with no principles.
>
All of us? Including Zenaan?
On 09/03/2016 12:22 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:03:56AM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 09/02/2016 11:30 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:33:58PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
On 09/02/2016 09:26 PM, Razer wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 07:01 PM, Zenaan
This thread is/was about one of the ugliest smear campaigns ever against a
Honest Man. Against Jake Appelbaum.
On this thread people with Heart & Soul tried to defend this Man's
Reputation. This Man's Dignity. Man's LIFE.
And what have you done from this thread? A?
Your fucken childish games. bla
Tor, et al, are well described now.
Other oppurtunities exist for, or will be made by, those wishing to take them.
That's what it's all about :)
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:33:33PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:08:39AM -0700, Razer wrote:
> > I just took a look at the Wikipedia entry for 'greylisting'. It sounds
> > awful if you're victimized by it. My personal mail from openmailbox to a
> > friend was rejected by yahoo b/c
Alex, in the past, you became my friend because of this ugly thread. The
same with Juan. We sent lots of private messages to each other and was
amazing a collective work to discover what was happening.
I learned to love df, a tor-talk list member, because of this thread. He
has a huge heart,
This thread has begin as a slander, as a lie of the JA Group to announce
and to spread the creation of their site with fake allegations, using own
Jacob Appelbaum's name.
I love Jake and if you have some doubt about about my loyalty and
friendship, please, ask him. :)
This thread was something
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:03:56AM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 11:30 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:33:58PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
> >> On 09/02/2016 09:26 PM, Razer wrote:
> >>> On 09/02/2016 07:01 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at
- Forwarded message from Georgi Guninski -
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 08:49:34 +0300
From: Georgi Guninski
To: Jerry Leichter
Cc: Florian Weimer , Cryptography List
Subject: Re:
On 09/02/2016 11:56 PM, Александр wrote:
> This thread is about one of the ugliest smear campaigns ever against a
> Honest Man. Against Jake Appelbaum. On this thread people with Heart & Soul
> tried to defend this Man's Reputation. Man's Life.
Truth.
> And what have you done from this thread?
On 09/02/2016 11:30 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:33:58PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 09/02/2016 09:26 PM, Razer wrote:
>>> On 09/02/2016 07:01 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 06:06:24PM -0700, Razer wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 05:51 PM, Zenaan
45 matches
Mail list logo