On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:43:26 -0800, you wrote:
-- how does a property owner authenticate a person or group claiming to be cops?
Flashing a badge is not enough, as badges for hundreds of jurisdictions are for
sale by mail order, gun shows, and probably lots of other shops. (For the
uninitiated,
At 4:22 PM -0800 on 2/10/03, Tim May wrote:
In this age of the War on (Some) Dictators and the War on (Some) Drugs,
the persecutors have to pick their targets for maximum effect. Hence
the impending life sentence for the Berkeley guy who committed
thoughtcrime by writing books and articles
at Monday, February 10, 2003 3:20 AM, Jim Choate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was seen to say:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote:
The OS doesn't boot until you type in your passphrase, plug in your
USB fob, etc. and allow it to read the key. Like, Duh! You know,
you really ought to stop smoking crack.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:32:13PM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
TPM != TCPA. TCPA with *user* control is good.
The TPM is a mandatory part of the TCPA specifications.
There will be no TCPA without TPM.
And there will be no TCPA-enabled system with complete user control.
Just look at the main
While I have a lot of problem with the Pledge in any form, I think it
would be greatly improved if it were made to the Constitution, rather
than the flag.
But wouldn't that hint to these children that they may actually
have to think ? You don't have to think of a flag, you just react
with
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
But wouldn't that hint to these children that they may actually
have to think ? You don't have to think of a flag, you just react
with (preprepared) emotions, but with a constitution...
No reason we can't start a movement to plege alegiance to
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Michel Messerschmidt wrote:
The TPM is a mandatory part of the TCPA specifications.
There will be no TCPA without TPM.
That makes sense, TPM is just key storage.
And there will be no TCPA-enabled system with complete user control.
Just look at the main specification:
Oh look, it's a brand new fluff piece on Meganet and their Virtual Matrix
Encryption, deconstructed years ago in various forums, including this one.
http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/dir.1998.01.01-1998.01.07/msg00047.html
Why on earth is the Department of Labor giving them money?
Meganet now
Here in war-preparing America, reports are running on CNN, CNBC, CBS,
and presumably other networks about the importance of some basic
emergency supplies for all good citizen-units. This is mostly good
advice, of course.
Being a paranoid and a kind of survivalist, I already have first aid
At 10:44 AM -0800 2/11/03, Tim May wrote:
But in postmodern America mentioning guns is simply NOT DONE. Not even
on the Fox Network, a more rightward network than the others. (Being
right no longer means mentioning guns, as Ashcroft and Cheney and the
like would prefer that guns be in the hands of
My point was that a gun is an item for an emergency, not that everyone
who does not now have one should buy one. Nor was my point addressing
the issue of what would happen if everyone tried to buy one suddenly!?
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Trei, Peter wrote:
Three points:
1.
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Bill Frantz wrote:
At 10:44 AM -0800 2/11/03, Tim May wrote:
But in postmodern America mentioning guns is simply NOT DONE. Not even
on the Fox Network, a more rightward network than the others. (Being
right no longer means mentioning guns, as
At 10:44 AM -0800 2/11/03, Tim May wrote:
But in postmodern America mentioning guns is simply NOT DONE. Not even
on the Fox Network, a more rightward network than the others. (Being
right no longer means mentioning guns, as Ashcroft and Cheney and the
like would prefer that guns be in the hands of
Tim May[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[...]
That Item Whose Name May Not Be Spoken on Television: a gun.
If there's disruption, looting, a breakdown in what now passes for
civil order, a gun is just about the most important thing to have.
Probably not necessary to use it, for 99.5% of
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Tim May wrote:
And so on. He talks the talk, but he and his buddies in HomeSec are
establishing a national police force, states rights be damned.
He's proof that you can fool just about everyone simultaneously -
the NRA supports him inspite of his lack of of commitment to
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:25:25AM -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
How
about a publishing bot that creates a current and accessible db of randomly
selected recent emails crossing the Internet alphabetized by sender name
and email address? My guess is that if the scoundrels supplying the data
[use login: cyberpunks/cyberpunks]
By PAUL KRUGMAN
George W. Bush's admirers often describe his stand against Saddam Hussein
as Churchillian. Yet his speeches about Iraq and for that matter about
everything else have been notably lacking in promises of blood, toil,
tears and sweat. Has
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:44:13 -0800, Tim May wrote:
But in postmodern America mentioning guns is simply NOT DONE. Not even on the Fox
Network, a more rightward network than the others. (Being right no longer means
mentioning guns, as Ashcroft and Cheney and the like would prefer that guns be in
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:00:38 -0800, you wrote:
At 10:44 AM -0800 2/11/03, Tim May wrote:
But in postmodern America mentioning guns is simply NOT DONE. Not even
on the Fox Network, a more rightward network than the others. (Being
right no longer means mentioning guns, as Ashcroft and Cheney
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Mike Rosing wrote:
Some 40+ years ago we had to learn it in kindergarten. One kid
refused and they took him out of class.
His and the other kids parents were pussies.
I first went to school about the same time ago, 1966 in Houston. I didn't
do the pledge and they called
Except that there are so few of those no one has ever been able to
quantify/qualify them, so we don't know what that really consists of.
When you say those are you referring to bad acid trips? (Don't tell me
you've never had one!) I'll grant, however, that bad trips seem to occur
much more on
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:34:54PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Except that there are so few of those no one has ever been able to
quantify/qualify them, so we don't know what that really consists of.
When you say those are you referring to bad acid trips? (Don't tell me
you've never had
Harmon Seaver wrote...
As far as actual LSD goes -- none. And I did a couple hundred,
anyway. Towards the end (and after it was suggested on the Senate floor
that
bad drugs be created and distributed on the streets to freak out LSD
users),
many things were sold as LSD which were not. I
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:20:19PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Harmon Seaver wrote...
As far as actual LSD goes -- none. And I did a couple hundred,
anyway. Towards the end (and after it was suggested on the Senate floor
that
bad drugs be created and distributed on the streets to freak
On Tuesday, Feb 11, 2003, at 21:25 Europe/London, Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:34:54PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Except that there are so few of those no one has ever been able to
quantify/qualify them, so we don't know what that really consists of.
When you say those are
25 matches
Mail list logo
