Dear DBWG,
Please see below (inline)...
Le lundi 1 mars 2021, Simon Seruyinda a écrit :
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> Thanks for your input.
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your email, brother.
>
> > On 28 Feb 2021, at 17:55, Sylvain Baya wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> > >
> >
> > Org-type Status Descriptions
> >
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks for your input.
> On 28 Feb 2021, at 17:55, Sylvain Baya wrote:
>
> Dear DBWG,
>
> Please see my comments below (inline)...
>
> Le vendredi 26 février 2021, Frank Habicht a écrit :
>
>
> On 26/02/2021 04:00, Nishal Goburdhan wrote:
> > could you please post this in
Dear DBWG,
Please see my comments below (inline)...
Le vendredi 26 février 2021, Frank Habicht a écrit :
>
>
> On 26/02/2021 04:00, Nishal Goburdhan wrote:
> > could you please post this in plain text. some of us don’t click on
> > [...]
> >
>
> the content of the PDF can really easily be
Dear Frank,
The status is being considered as a feasible use case to cater for the
certain business scenarios, where closed organisations may hold the
status for a specific period of time before being finally removed.
However, the ORG-HDL being relied upon by most internal systems, a
thorough
Dear AfriNIC team,
my initial reaction on reading the list was that I'm eager to know more
about what the plans for 'CLOSED' are. Can you explain more?
o 'CLOSED'
This represents organisations that were at one point an active AFRINIC
resource or associate member but no longer holds an active
On 26/02/2021 04:00, Nishal Goburdhan wrote:
> could you please post this in plain text. some of us don’t click on
> random attachments (and it’s bad faith for you to propagate that notion ..)
> (i did run this through strings, but i want to be sure that what i read,
> was actually that which
On 25 Feb 2021, at 17:05, Simon Seruyinda wrote:
Hi Frank,
Please see attached the org-type description.
We need the working groups confirmation on whether to proceed to
disable the ones that are not applicable as described in the document.
Once the above is confirmed, next step will be to
Hi Frank,
Please see attached the org-type description.
We need the working groups confirmation on whether to proceed to disable the
ones that are not applicable as described in the document.
Once the above is confirmed, next step will be to update these in the WHOIS so
that they are visible
Hi Madhvi,
thanks for your email.
it corrects my perception. [and i am happy that i brought it up]
I guess that we can expect both items to be done within the coming week.
Regards,
Frank
On 04/10/2020 20:45, Madhvi Gokool wrote:
> Hello Frank
>
> The commitment was for staff to provide a
Hello Frank
The commitment was for staff to provide a definition of the org-types to
the database working group and I further added that the definitions
should then be made available when we perform a whois query. This way,
they shall be publicly available to any person wanting to know what each
Hi all,
so, in order to try to start chop away from all the pending items from
the meeting:
there was a request (from SM, iirc) about the exact definitions what the
different 'org-type:' attribute values are and what the definitions are,
when to use which.
Iirc, Madhvi responded that these can
11 matches
Mail list logo
